A study of comprehensive school reform programs in Arizona

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2319-2340

  Mccaslin, Mary ^a   Good, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049169803     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Averch, H., Carroll, S., Donaldson, T., Kiesling, H., & Pincus, J. (1974). How effective is schooling? A critical review of research. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
2. Biddle, B. (1997). Foolishness, dangerous nonsense, and real correlates of state differences in achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 8-13.
3. Bloom H. (2002, May). Longitudinal analysis of the accelerated model. Paper presented at the Network of Researchers meeting, Washington, DC.
4. Brookover. W., Beadie, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
5. Borman, G. D., & D'Agostino, J. V. (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 309-326.
6. Borman, G., Hewes, G., Overman, L., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 107-125.
7. Borman, G. D., Stringfield, S C., & Slavin, R. E. (Eds.). (2001). Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cohen, M. (1983). Instructional, management, and social conditions in effective schools. In A. Webb & L. Webb (Eds.), School finance and school improvement: Linkages in the 1980s (pp. 17-50). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9. Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Meade, A., Weinfeld, F., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
10. D'Agostino, J. V., Borman, G. D., Hedges, I. V., & Wong, K. K. (1998). Longitudinal achievement and Chapter 1 coordination in high-poverty schools: A multi-level analysis of the Prospects data, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 3, 401-420.
11. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (1999). America's children: Key national indicators of well-being (NCES 1999-019). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
12. Good, T. L., Biddle, B., & Brophy, J. E. (1975). Teachers make a difference. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
13. Good, T., & Brophy,J. (1986). School effects. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 570-604). New York: Macmillan.
14. Good, T. L., Burross, H. L., & McCaslin (2005). Comprehensive school reform: A longitudinal study of school improvement in one state. Teachers College Record, 107, 2205-2226.
15. Hanushek, E. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.
16. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., & Bane, M.J. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
17. Jensen, A. R. (1973). Educability and Group Differences. New York: Harper and Row.
18. Klaus, P. E. (1973). Yesterday's children: A longitudinal study of children from kindergarten into the adult years. New York: Wiley.
19. Klitgaard, R., & Hall, G. (1974). Are there unusually effective schools? Journal of Human Resources, 74, 90-106.
20. Ladd, H., & Hansen, J. (Eds.). (1999). Making money matter: Financing America's schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. McCaslin, M., Burross, H. L., & Good, T. L. (2005). Change and continuity in student achievement from Grades 3 to 5: A policy dilemma. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(1), 1-18.
22. McCaslin, M., & DiMarino-Linnen, E. (2000). Motivation and learning in school: Societal contexts, psychological constructs, and educational practices. In T. Good (Ed.), Schooling in America: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow; 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 84-151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1996a). Listening in classrooms. New York: Harper Collins Press.
24. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1996b). The informal curriculum. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 622-673). New York: Macmillan.
25. McCormack-Larkin, M., & Kritek, W. J. (1983). Milwaukee's Project RISE. Educational leadership, 40(3), 16-21.
26. National School Boards Association. (1999, November 29). Ten critical threats to America's children: Warning signs for the next millennium. A report to the nation presented by the National League of Cities, National School Boards Association, Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Youth Crime Watch of America. Retrieved April 25, 2008, from http://www.nsba.org/bookreports/ten- threats.pdf
27. Pogrow, S. (1999). Overcoming the cognitive wall: Accelerating the learning of Title I students after the third grade. In G. Orfield & E. Debray (Eds.), Hard work for good schools: Facts not fads in Title I reform. The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (mimeo). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447247)
28. Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
29. Ross. S. M., Alberg, M., & Nunnery, J. (1998). Selection and evaluation of locally developed versus externally developed schoolwide projects. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis.
30. Rowan, B., Bossert, S., & Dwyer, D. (1983). Research on effective schools: A cautionary note. Educational Researcher, 12(4), 24-31.
31. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Slavin, R. (1999). How Title I can become the engine of reform in America's schools. In G. Orfield & E. Debray (Eds.), Hard work for good schools: Facts not fads in Title I reform (pp. 86-101). The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (mimeo). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447247)
33. Stiefel, L., Rubenstein, R., & Berne, R. (1998). Intra-district equity in four large cities: Data, methods, and results. Education Finance, 23, 447-467.
34. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M. A., Herman, R., Yoder, N., Brigham, N., Nesselrodt, P., et al. (with Gamse, B., Puma, M., Rosenblum, S., Beaumont, J., Randall, B., & Smith, L.). (1997). Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
35. Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Weber, G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
37. Wong, K, K., & Meyer, S.J. (1998). Title I schoolwide programs: A synthesis of findings from recent evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 115-136.