Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California

Teachers College Record

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 294-343

  Cohen, David K ^a   Hill, Heather C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034382326     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0161-4681.00057     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ball, D. L., & Rundquist, S. S. (1993). Collaboration as context for joining teacher learning with learning about teaching. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching understanding (pp. 13-42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Berliner, D. (1979). Tempus educate. In P. Peterson & H. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 120-135). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
4. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change. Vol. VIII. Implementation and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
5. Brown, C. A., Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1996, April). Linking teacher support to enhanced classroom instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
6. Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1261-1312.
7. Cohen,D.K. (1989) Teaching practice: Plus ca change.... In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change. Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84) Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
8. Cohen, D.K., & Spillane, J.P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 18, 3-49.
9. Corcoran, T. B. (1995). Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
10. Cronbach, L. J., Bradburn, N. M., & Horvitz, D. G. (1994) Sampling and statistical procedures used in the California Learning Assessment System. Palo Alto, CA: CLAS Select Committee.
11. Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1980. New York: Longman.
12. Dow, P. B. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Elmore, R. F. (1979). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601-616.
14. Guthrie, J. W. (Ed.). (1990). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3).
15. Heaton, R. M., & Lampert, M. (1993). Learning to hear voices: Inventing a new pedagogy of teacher education. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 43-83). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Kennedy, M. M. (1998, April). Form and substance in inservice teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
17. Kirst, M. W., & Mazzeo, C. (1996). The rise, fall, and rise of state assessment in California, 1993-96. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(4), 319-323.
18. Lash, A., Perry, R., & Talbert, J. (1996). Survey of elementary mathematics education in California Technical report and user's guide to SAS files. Stanford, CA: Authors.
19. Leinhardt, G., & Seewaldt, A. M. (1981). Overlap: What's tested, what's taught. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(2), 85-95.
20. Linn, R. L. (1983). Testing and instruction: Links and distinctions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(2), 179-189.
21. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Little, J. W. (1989). District policy choices and teachers' professional development opportunities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 165-179.
23. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(2), 129-151.
24. Lord, B. (1994). Teachers' professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in education (pp. 175-204). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
25. Mayer, D. P. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 29-45.
26. McCarthy, S. J., & Peterson, P. L. (1993). Creating classroom practice within the context of a restructured professional development school. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 130-166). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. McLaughlin, M. W. (1991). Enabling professional development: What have we learned? In A. Lieberman and L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development for education in the '90s (pp. 61-82). New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Murnane, R. J., & Raizen, S. A. (1988) Improving indicators of the quality of science and mathematics education in grades K-12. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. O'Day, J. & Smith, M. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent policy (pp. 250-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Perry, R. (1996). The role of teachers' professional communities in the implementation of California mathematics reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
31. Porter, A. C. (1991) Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1) 13-29.
32. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1984). Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33. Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education. New York: Teachers' College Press.
34. Schwille, J., Porter, A., Floden, R., Freeman, D., Knapp, L., Kuhs, T., & Schmidt, W. (1983). Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school mathematics. In L. Schulman and G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 370-391). New York: Longman.
35. Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L., Oakes, J., & Carey, N. (1987). Indicator systems for monitoring mathematics and science education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
36. Weiss, I. (1994). A profile of science and mathematics education in the United States: 1993. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research Inc.
37. Welch, W. W. (1979). Twenty years of science curriculum development: A look back. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 7, pp. 282-306). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
38. Wiley, D., & Yoon, B. (1995). Teacher reports of opportunity to learn: Analyses of the 1993 California learning assessment system. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 355-370.
39. Wilson, S. M., Miller, C., & Yerkes, C. (1993). Deeply rooted change: A tale of teaching adventurously. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 84-129). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.