What do we know about how teachers influence student performance on standardized tests: And why do we know so little about other student outcomes?

Teachers College Record

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Good, Thomas L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893191874     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. American Federation of Teachers. (2012). Raising the Bar: Aligning and elevating teacher preparation and the teaching profession. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Baldi, S., Jin, Y., Skemer, M., Green, P. J., & Herget, D. (2007). Highlights from PISA 2006 Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context (NCES 2008-016). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
3. Beckerman, T., & Good, T. (1981). The classroom ratio of high-and low-aptitude students and its effects on achievement. American Education Research Journal, 18, 317-327.
4. Berliner, D. (2013). Exogenous variables and value-added assessments: A fatal flaw. Teachers College Record, 116(1), XXX-XXX.
5. Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
6. Berliner, D., Fisher, C., Filby, N., & Marliave, R. (1978). Executive summary of Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.
7. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2010). Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching project. Seattle, WA: Author.
8. Brattesani, K. A., Weinstein, R. S., & Marshall, H. H. (1984). Student perceptions of differential teacher treatment as moderators of teacher expectation effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 236-247.
9. Brophy, J. (1973). Stability of teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 10(3), 245-252.
10. Brophy, J. (2012). Observational research on generic aspects of classroom teaching. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.; pp. 755-780). New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Brophy, J., & Evertson, C. (1978). Context variables in teaching. Educational Psychologist, 12, 310-316.
12. Brophy J., & Evertson, C. (1981). Student characteristics and teaching. New York, NY: Longman.
13. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.; pp. 328-375). New York, NY: Macmillian.
14. Brownell, W. A. (1947). The place of meaning in the teaching of elementary school arithmetic. Elementary School Journal, 47, 256-265.
15. Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. Review of Research in Education, 8, 158-233.
16. Carpenter, T., Dossey, J., & Koehler J. (Eds.). (2004). Classics in mathematics educational research. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17. Collins, G. (2012, September 1). Only the good get rich [op-ed]. The New York Times, pp. A23.
18. Collins, G., & Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2013). Putting growth and value-added models on the map: A national overview. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 30-30.
19. Cooper, H. M., & Good, T. L. (1983). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the expectation communication process. New York, NY: Longman.
20. Cuban, L. (2010). As good as it gets: What school reform brought to Austin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education. How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York. NY: Teachers College Press.
22. Dubriel, J. B. (1977). A study of two plans for utilization of class time in first year algebra (Doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia.
23. Ebmeier, H. (1978). An investigation of the interactive effects among student types, teacher types, and treatment types on the mathematics achievement of fourth grade students. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Missouri, Columbia.
24. Ebmeier, H., & Good, T. L. (1979). The effects of instructing teachers about good teaching on the mathematics achievement of fourth-grade students. American Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 1-16.
25. Educate America Act. (1994). From Public Law 103-227, Goals 2000.
26. Emmer, E., Evertson, C., & Anderson, L. (1980). Effective classroom management at the beginning of the school year. The Elementary School Journal, 80, 219-231.
27. Emmer, E., & Gerwels, M. C. (2006). Classroom management in middle and high school classrooms. In C. Evertson & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 407-437). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Evertson, C., & Weinstein, C. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Farr, S. (2010). Teaching as leadership: The highly-effective teacher's guide to closing the achievement gap. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30. Fisher, C., Filby, N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L., Dishaw, M., Moore, J., & Berliner, D. (1978). Beginning teacher evaluation study. San Francisco, CA: Far West Regional Educational Laboratory.
31. Freiberg, H. J., Huzinec, C. A., & Templeton, S. M. (2009). Classroom management-a pathway to student achievement: A study of fourteen inner-city elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 110(1), 63-80.
32. Good, T. (1968). Student achievement level and differential opportunity for classroom response. (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
33. Good, T. (1970). Which pupils do teachers call on? Elementary School Journal, 70, 190-198.
34. Good, T (1996). Teaching effects and teacher evaluation. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.; pp. 617-665). New York, NY: MacMillan.
35. Good, T. L. (2010). Forty years of research on teaching 1968-2008: What do we know now that we didn't know then? In R. Marzano (Ed.), On excellence in teaching (pp. 31-62). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
36. Good, T., Biddle, B., & Brophy, J. (1975). Teachers make a difference. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
37. Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1975). Teacher rapport: Some stability data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 179-182.
38. Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: an experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 355-362.
39. Good, T. L., & Braden, J. S. (2000). The great school debate: Choice, vouchers, and charters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
41. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
42. Herlihy, C., Karger, E., Pollard, C., Hill, H., Kraft, M., Williams, M., & Howard, S. (2013). State and local efforts to investigate the validity and reliability of scores from teacher evaluation systems. Teachers College Record.
43. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
44. Hook, C., & Rosenshine, B. (1979). Accuracy of teacher reports of their classroom behavior. Review of Educational Research, 49, 1-12.
45. Konstantopoulos, S. (2006). Trends of school effects on student achievement: Evidence from NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92. Teachers College Record, 108, 2550-2581.
46. Konstantopoulos, S. (2011). Teacher effects in early grades? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Teachers College Record, 113, 1541-1565.
47. Konstantopoulos, S. (2013). Teacher effects, Value-Added Models, and Accountability. Teachers College Record, 116(1), XXX-XXX.
48. Konstantopoulos, S., & Chung, V. (2011). The persistence of teacher effects in elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 361-386.
49. Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
50. Lavigne, A. (2013). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1), XXX-XXX.
51. Lavigne, A., & Good, T. (in press). Evaluating teachers and students. New York, NY: Routledge.
52. Lefstein, A. (2008). Changing classroom practice through the English National Literacy Strategy: A micro-interactional perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 701-737.
53. Lundgren, U. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process: A contribution to curriculum theory and theory on teaching. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksell.
54. McCaslin, M. (2006). Student motivational dynamics in the era of school reform. Elementary School Journal, 106, 479-490.
55. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1996). Informal curriculum. In D. Berliner & C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56. Moe, T. M., & Chubb, J. E. (2009). Liberating learning: Technology, politics, and the future of American education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
57. Morgan, S., & Poppe, E. (2012). The consequences of international comparisons for public support of K-12 education: Evidence from a national survey experiment. Educational Researcher, 41(7), 262-268.
58. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
59. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
60. Nichols, S., & Good, T. (2004). America's teenagers-myths and realities: Media images, schooling, and the social costs of careless indifference. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
61. Payne, C. (2010). So much reform, so little change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
62. Phi Delta Kappa. (2011). Highlights of the 2011 PDK/Gallup poll. Retrieved from http://www.pdkintl.org/poll/docs/pdkpoll43_2011.pdf
63. Phi Delta Kappa. (2012). Highlights of the 2012 PDK/Gallup poll. Retrieved from http://www.pdkintl.org/poll/docs/2012-Gallup-poll-full-report.pdf
64. Pidgeon, D. (1970). Expectation and pupil performance (Doctoral dissertation). Slough, Great Britain: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales.
65. Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M. B., & Ronau, R. N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 372-400.
66. Raudenbush, S. (1984). Magnitude of teacher expectancy effects on pupil IQ as a function of the credibility of expectancy induction: A synthesis of findings from 18 experiments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 85-97.
67. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
68. Ripley, A. (2010, January 12). What makes a great teacher? The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/01/what-makes-a-great-teacher/307841/.
69. Rohrkemper, M., & Corno, L. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptive learning and classroom teaching. Elementary School Journal, 88, 297-312.
70. Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). Research on teacher performance criteria. In B. O. Smith (Ed.), Research in teacher education: A symposium. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
71. Rothstein, R. (2000). Toward a composite index of school performance. Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 409-441.
72. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
73. Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high and low expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 289-306.
74. Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2010). Teacher expectations and perceptions of student characteristics: Is there a relationship? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 121-135.
75. Sahlberg, P. (2010). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
76. Schmidt, W., & Maier, A. (2009). Opportunity to learn. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. Plank (Eds.), Handbook on educational policy research (pp. 541-559). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
77. Schoenfeld, A., & Pearson, P. (2009). The reading and math wars. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. Plank (Eds.), Handbook on educational policy research (pp. 560-580). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
78. Shipp, D., & Deer, G. (1960). The use of class time in arithmetic. Arithmetic Teacher, 7, 117-121.
79. Shuster, A., & Pigge, F. (1965). Retention efficiency of meaningful teaching. Arithmetic Teacher, 12, 24-31.
80. Stigler, J. W., Lee, S-Y., & Stevenson, H. (1987). Mathematics classrooms in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Child Development, 58, 1272-1285.
81. Strong, M. (2011). The highly qualified teacher: What is teacher quality and how do we measure it? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
82. USA Today. (2012, December 2). 5 states to increase class time in some schools. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/12/02/longer-school-days-year/1740703/
83. Veldman, D. J., & Sanford, J. P. (1984). The influence of class ability level on student achievement and classroom behavior. American Education Research Journal, 21, 629-644.
84. Weinstein, R. S., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1975). Student perceptions of teacher interactions with male high and low achievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 421.