Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction

Learning, Culture and Social Interaction

Volumn 16, Issue , 2018, Pages 1-19

  Isohätälä, Jaana ^a   Näykki, Piia ^a   Järvelä, Sanna ^a   Baker, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030213376     PISSN: 22106561     EISSN: 2210657X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Allwood, J., Nivre, J., Ahlsén, E., On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics 9:1 (1993), 1–26.
2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M.J., Arguing to learn. Sawyer, K., (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York, 439–460.
3. Andriessen, J., Baker, M.J., van der Puil, C., Socio-cognitive tension in collaborative working relations. Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., Säljö R., (eds.) Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices, 2011, Routledge, Abingdon, 222–242.
4. Andriessen, J., Pardijs, M., Baker, M.J., Getting on and getting along: tension in the development of collaboration. Baker, M.J., Andriessen, J., Järvelä S., (eds.) Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, New York, 205–230.
5. Arvaja, M., Häkkinen, P., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Social processes and knowledge building during small group interaction in a school science project. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 46:2 (2002), 161–179 https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830220142182.
6. Asterhan, C.S.C., Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation: Conceptualization and quantitative assessment. Baker, M.J., Andriessen, J., Järvelä S., (eds.) Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, Abingdon, 251–271.
7. Asterhan, C.S.C., Babichenko, M., The social dimension of learning through argumentation: Effects of human presence and discourse style. Journal of Educational Psychology 107:3 (2015), 740–755 https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000014.
8. Asterhan, C.S.C., Schwarz, B.B., Transformation of robust misconceptions through peer argumentation. Schwarz, B.B., Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., (eds.) Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction, 2009, Routledge, Abingdon, 159–172 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879276.
9. Asterhan, C.S.C., Schwarz, B.B., Argumentation for learning: Well-Trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist 51:2 (2016), 164–187 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458.
10. Bachorowski, J.-A., Vocal expression and perception of emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8:2 (1999), 53–57 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00013.
11. Baker, M.J., Argumentation and constructive interaction. Coirier, P., Andriessen, J., (eds.) Studies in writing: Vol. 5. Foundations of argumentative text processing, 1999, University of Amsterdam Press, Amsterdam, 179–202.
12. Baker, M.J., Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge. Mirza, N.M., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., (eds.) Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices, 2009, Springer, New York, 1–16.
13. Baker, M.J., Andriessen, J., Järvelä S., Introduction: Visions of learning together. Baker, M.J., Andriessen, J., Järvelä S., (eds.) Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, Abingdon, 1–30.
14. Baker, M.J., Bielaczyc, K., Missed opportunities for learning in collaborative problem-solving interactions. Greer, J., (eds.) Proceedings of AI-ED ‘95: World conference on artificial intelligence in education, 1995, AACE, Washington D.C., 210–217.
15. Barron, B., Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 9:4 (2000), 403–436 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904.
16. Barron, B., When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12:3 (2003), 307–359 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203.
17. Barth, E.M., Krabbe, E.C.W., From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation. 1982, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
18. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., Rumble, M., Defining twenty-first century skills. Griffin, P., McGaw, B., Care, E., (eds.) Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, 2012, Springer, New York, 17–66 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2.
19. Brown, P., Levinson, S., Politeness: Some universals in language use. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4 (1987), 55–84 https://doi.org/10.2307/3587263.
20. Brown, R., Renshaw, P., Collective argumentation: A sociocultural approach to reframing classroom teaching and learning. Cowie, H., van der Aalsvoort, G., (eds.) Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge, 2000, Pergamon, New York, 52–66.
21. Brummernhenrich, B., Jucks, R., Managing face threats and instructions in online tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology 105:2 (2013), 341–350 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031928.
22. Cahour, B., Emotions: Characteristics, emergence and circulation in interactional learning. Baker, M.J., Andriessen, J., Järvelä S., (eds.) Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, Abingdon, 52–70.
23. Chang, A., Bordia, P., A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Small Group Research 32:4 (2001), 379–405 https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200401.
24. Chiu, M.M., Khoo, L., Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving: Do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correct solutions?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.506.
25. Clark, D.B., Sampson, V., Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45:3 (2008), 293–321.
26. Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E., Grounding in communication. Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., Teasley, S.D., (eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 1991, American Psychological Association, Washington D.C., 127–149.
27. Clark, H.H., Schaefer, E.F., Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13:2 (1989), 259–294 https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(89)90008-6.
28. Cohen, E.G., Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 64:1 (1994), 1–35 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001.
29. Conlin, L.D., Building shared understanding in introductory physics tutorials through risk, repair, conflict & comedy. 2012, University of Maryland.
30. Damsa, D., Ludvigsen, S., Andriessen, J., Knowledge co-construction - Epistemic consensus or relational assent?. Baker, M.J., Andriessen, J., Järvelä S., (eds.) Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, Abingdon, 97–119.
31. Derry, S.J., Pea, R.D., Barron, B., Engle, R.a., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Sherin, B.L., Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19:1 (2010), 3–53 https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884.
32. Dillenbourg, P., What do you mean by “collaborative learning”?. Dillenbourg, P., (eds.) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1999, Elsevier, Oxford, 1–15 http://doi.org/10.1.1.167.4896.
33. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M.J., Blaye, A., O'Malley, C., The evolution of research on collaborative learning. Spada, H., Reimann, P., (eds.) Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, 1995, Elsevier, Oxford, 189–211.
34. Edmondson, A., Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1999), 350–352 https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999.
35. Enyedy, N., Stevens, R., Analyzing collaboration. Sawyer, K., (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York, 191–212.
36. Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Deliberation versus dispute: The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom. Informal Logic 29:4 (2009), 417–446 http://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i4.2907.
37. Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., Villarroel, C., Gilabert, S., Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2015, 372–386 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12078.
38. Frijda, N.H., The Laws of Emotion. American Psychologist 43:5 (1988), 349–358.
39. Gilbert, M., Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24:2 (1994), 159–177.
40. Gilbert, M., Emotion, argumentation and informal logic. Informal Logic 24:3 (2004), 245–264 http://doi.org/10.22329/il.v24i3.2147.
41. Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B.B., Harnessing emotions to deliberative argumentation in classroom discussions on historical issues in multi-cultural contexts. Frontline Learning Research 4:4 (2016), 7–19.
42. Groarke, L., Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter?. Argumentation 29:2 (2015), 133–155 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0.
43. Guzzo, R.A., Yost, P.R., Campbell, R.J., Shea, G.P., Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. The British Journal of Social Psychology 32 (1993), 87–106 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x.
44. Häkkinen, P., Järvelä S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., Valtonen, T., Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 23:1 (2017), 25–41 https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772.
45. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P.A., Kanselaar, G., Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 25:1 (2009), 161–170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010.
46. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P.A., Kanselaar, G., Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning 7:1 (2010), 25–43 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5.
47. Järvelä S., Malmberg, J., Sobocinski, M., Haataja, E., & Kirschner, P. A. (n.d.). What multimodal data can tell us about the self-regulated learning process?.
48. Järvenoja, H., Järvelä S., Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges?. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 79:3 (2009), 463–481 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811.
49. Jefferson, G., Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Lerner, G.H., (eds.) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 2004, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 13–31.
50. Jordan, B., Henderson, A., Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4:1 (1995), 39–103 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401.
51. Karau, S., Williams, K., Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:4 (1993), 681–706.
52. King, A., Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Into Practice 41:1 (2002), 33–39 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6.
53. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W., Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior 19:3 (2003), 335–353 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2.
54. Kuhn, D., The importance of learning about knowing: Creating a foundation for development of intellectual values. Child Development Perspectives 3:2 (2009), 112–117 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00089.x.
55. Kuhn, D., Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education 94:5 (2010), 810–824 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395.
56. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., Felton, M., Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction 15:3 (1997), 287–315 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1.
57. Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., Zavala, J., Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction 31:4 (2013), 456–496 https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.830618.
58. Kwon, K., Liu, Y.-H., Johnson, L.P., Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education 78 (2014), 185–200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004.
59. Lakoff, G., Hedges: A study of meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Peranteau, P., Levi, J., Phares, G., (eds.) Papers from the eighth regional meeting, 1972, Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, 183–228.
60. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T.K., Koskey, K.L.K., Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36:1 (2011), 13–24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001.
61. Martinovski, B., Mao, W., Emotion as an argumentation engine: Modeling the role of emotion in negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation 18:3 (2009), 235–259 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9153-7.
62. Mercer, N., The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction 6:4 (1996), 359–377 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7.
63. Miyake, N., Kirschner, P.A., The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning. Sawyer, K.R., (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York, 418–438.
64. Muntigl, P., Turnbull, W., Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 29 (1998), 225–256.
65. Näykki, P., Isohätälä J., Järvelä S., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with theory-based script. 2017, 10.1007/s11412-017-9259-5.
66. Näykki, P., Järvelä S., Kirschner, P.A., Järvenoja, H., Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning – A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research 68 (2014), 1–14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001.
67. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., Chizari, M., Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education 61:1 (2013), 59–76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013.
68. Nussbaum, E.M., Sinatra, G.M., Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28:3 (2003), 384–395 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3.
69. Osborne, J., Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science 328 (2010), 463–466 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944.
70. Pekrun, R., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Academic emotions and student engagement. Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C., (eds.) Hanbook of Research on Student Engagement, 2012, Springer, New York, 259–282.
71. Plantin, C., On the inseparability of emotion and reason in argumentation. Weigand, E., (eds.) Emotion in dialogic interaction: Advances in the complex, 2004, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 265–276.
72. Polo, C., Lund, K., Plantin, C., Niccolai, G.P., Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2016, 123–156 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9232-8.
73. Rogat, T.K., Adams-Wiggins, K.R., Other-regulation in collaborative groups: Implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science 42:6 (2014), 879–904 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9322-9.
74. Rogat, T.K., Adams-Wiggins, K.R., Interrelation between regulatory and socioemotional processes within collaborative groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015), 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.026.
75. Rogat, T.K., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction 29:4 (2011), 375–415 https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607930.
76. Rogat, T.K., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., DiDonato, N., Motivation in collaborative groups. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Chan, C., Chinn, C.A., O'Donnell, A.M., (eds.) The international handbook of collaborative learning, 2013, Routledge, New York, 250–267.
77. Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.D., The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. O'Malley, C., (eds.) Computer-supported collaborative learning, 1995, Springer, Berlin, 69–97 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5.
78. Ryu, S., Lombardi, D., Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist 50:1 (2015), 70–83 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1001891.
79. Saab, N., Van Joolingen, W.R., Van Hout-Wolters, B., Communication in collaborative discovery learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 75:4 (2005), 603–621 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X42905.
80. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research 13:1 (1989), 89–99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90018-9.
81. Sampson, V., Clark, D.B., A comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups. Research in Science Education 41 (2011), 63–97 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9146-9.
82. Sargent, L.D., Sue-Chan, C., Does diversity affect group efficacy? The intervening role of cohesion and task interdependence. Small Group Research 32:4 (2001), 426–450 https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200403.
83. Schwarz, B.B., Shahar, N., Combining the dialogic and the dialectic: Putting argumentation into practice in classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction., 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.12.003.
84. Sinha, S., Rogat, T.K., Adams-Wiggins, K.R., Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 10:3 (2015), 273–307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9218-y.
85. Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science 40:2 (2012), 297–323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5.
86. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2:4 (2007), 421–447 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y.
87. Sullivan, F.R., Wilson, N.C., Playful talk: Negotiating opportunities to learn in collaborative groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 24:1 (2015), 5–52 https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.839945.
88. Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., Weinberger, A., Leveraging social networking sites for knowledge co-construction: Positive effects of argumentation structure, but premature knowledge consolidation after individual preparation. Learning and Instruction, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.004.
89. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W.H., Segers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research 37:5 (2006), 490–521 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406292938.
90. Van der Vegt, G., Emans, B., Van de Vliert, E., Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group & Organization Management 23:2 (1998), 124–143 https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601198232003.
91. Volet, S.E., Summers, M., Thurman, J., High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?. Learning and Instruction 19:2 (2009), 128–143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001.
92. Wang, Q., Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education 53:4 (2009), 1138–1146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.023.
93. Watson, C., Wilson, A., Drew, V., Thompson, T.L., Internet and higher education criticality and the exercise of politeness in online spaces for professional learning. The Internet and Higher Education 31 (2016), 43–51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.002.
94. Webb, N.M., Ing, M., Kersting, N., Nemer, K.M., Help seeking in cooperative learning groups. Karabenick, S.A., Newman, R.S., (eds.) Help seeking in academic settings: Goals, groups and contexts, 2006, Routledge, Mahwah, New Jersey, 45–88.
95. Wegerif, R., The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2:1 (1998), 34–49 (http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199610)47:10 < 797::AID-ASI20 > 3.0.CO;2-U).
96. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education 46:1 (2006), 71–95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003.
97. Yeh, K.-H., She, H.-C., On-line synchronous scientific argumentation learning: Nurturing students’ argumentation ability and conceptual change in science context. Computers & Education 55:2 (2010), 586–602.