The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning

The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 418-438

  Miyake, Naomi ^a   Kirschner, Paul A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938976808     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.026     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom. New York: Longman.
2. Baker, M. J. (1995). Negotiation in collaborative problem-solving dialogues. In R.-J. Beun, M. J. Baker, & M. Reiner (Eds.), Dialogue and instruction (pp. 39-55). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12,307-359.
5. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise Knowledge Forum. Open Court.
7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Brown, A. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52, 399-413.
9. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
10. Chang, A., & Bordia, P (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Small Group Research, 32, 379-405.
11. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
12. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Crawford, J. L., & Gordon, A. H. (1972). Predecisional information-seeking and subsequent conformity in the social influence process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 112-119.
14. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
15. Deutsch, M. (1980). Fifty years of conflict. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Retrospections on social psychology (pp. 46-77). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Dillenbourg, P, Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier.
17. Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5-28.
18. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
19. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Karkkainen, M., (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319-336.
20. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits in the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
22. Greeno, J. G., & Van de Sante, C. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 9-23.
23. Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Johi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
24. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. A. H. Stevenson & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York: Freeman.
25. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Homan, T. (2001). Teamleren: Theorie en facilitatie, [Team learning: Theory and facilitation.] Schoonhoven, Nederland: Academic.
27. Itakura, K. (1963). Kasetsu-Jikken-Jugyo no Teisho [The proposition of hypothesis-experiment-instruction]. Riko Kyoshitsu [The Journal of Science Education], November issue.
28. Itakura, K. (1997). Kasetsu-Jikken-Jugyo no ABC, Dai 4 han. (The ABC of the Hypothesis-Experiment-Instruction: Invitation to enjoyable classes, Ver. 4.), Kasetsu-Sha. [in Japanese].
29. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
30. Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 139-154.
31. Johnson, D. W. (1973). Communication in conflict situations: A critical review of the research. International Journal of Group Tensions, 3, 46-67.
32. Johnson, D. W, & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
33. Kearney, M. (2004). Classroom use of multimedia-supported predict-observe-explain tasks in a social constructivist learning environment. Research in Science Education, 34, 427-453.
34. Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225-242). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495-547.
36. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
37. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
38. Liew, C., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). A predict-observe-explain teaching sequence for learning about students ' understanding of heat and expansion of liquids. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 41, 68-71.
39. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.) (2008). Internet environments for science education (pp. 29-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Mesch, D., Marvin, L., Johnson, D. W, & Johnson, R. T. (1988). Impact of positive interdependence and academic group contingencies on achievement. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 345-352.
42. Miyake, N. (1986). Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. CognitiveScience, 10, 151-177.
43. Miyake, N. (2011). Fostering conceptual change through collaboration: Its cognitive mechanism, socio-cultural factors, and the promises of technological support. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2011), Hong Kong.
44. Mulder, I. (1999). Understanding technology mediated interaction processes. A theoretical context. Enschede, Netherlands: Telematica Instituut.
45. Mulder, I., Swaak, J., & Kessels, J. (2002). Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 35-47.
46. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210-227.
47. Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
49. Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521-562.
50. Saito, M., & Miyake, N. (2011) Socially constructive interaction for fostering conceptual change. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2011) (pp. 96-103). Hong Kong.
51. Sawyer, K. R. (Ed.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
53. Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Group effectiveness: What really matters? Sloan Management Review, 28, 25-31.
54. Shirouzu, H., Miyake, N., & Masukawa, H. (2002). Cognitively active externalization for situated reflection. Cognitive Science, 26, 469-501.
55. Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371-384.
56. Stahl, G. A. (2000, June). A model of collaborative knowledge building. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
57. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521.
58. Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group & Organization Management, 23(2), 124-143.
59. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
60. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
61. White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. Great Britain: Falmer Press.