Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL

Computers and Education

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 59-76

  Noroozi, Omid ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^b   Biemans, Harm J A ^a   Mulder, Martin ^a   Chizari, Mohammad ^c  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Argumentative knowledge construction; Collaborative learning; Computer supported collaborative learning; Multidisciplinary groups; Transactive discussion script

Indexed keywords

MARKETING; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ARGUMENTATIVE KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY GROUPS; TRANSACTIVE DISCUSSION SCRIPT;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84867318524     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. M. Aleixandre-Jimenez Designing argumentation learning environments S. Erduran, M. Aleixandre-Jimenez, Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research 2007 Springer New York 91 115
2. R. Andrews Teaching and learning argument 1995 Cassell Publishers London
3. J. Andriessen Arguing to learn R.K. Sawyer, The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2006 Cambridge University Press New York 443 460
4. J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments 2003 Kluwer Dordrecht
5. C.S.C. Asterhan, and B.B. Schwarz Transformation of robust misconceptions through peer argumentation B.B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, R. Hershkowitz, Guided transformation of knowledge in classrooms 2009 Routledge, Advances in Learning & Instruction series New York, NY 159 172
6. M. Baker Argumentation and constructive interaction G. Rijlaarsdam, E. Esperet, J. Andriessen, P. Coirier, Studies in writing Foundations of argumentative text processing Vol. 5 1999 Amsterdam University Press Amsterdam 179 202
7. M. Baker Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers, Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments 2003 Kluwer Boston 47 78
8. M. Baker Intersubjective and intrasubjective rationalities in pedagogical debates: realizing what one thinks B.B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, R. Hershkowitz, Guided transformation of knowledge in classrooms 2009 Routledge, Advances in Learning & Instruction series New York, NY 145 158
9. M. Baker, and K. Lund Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13 3 1997 175 193
10. E.M. Barth, and E.C.W. Krabbe From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation 1982 W. de Gruyter Berlin, New York
11. P.J. Beers, P.A. Kirschner, H.P.A. Boshuizen, and W.H. Gijselaers ICT-support for grounding in the classroom Instructional Science 35 6 2007 535 556
12. M.W. Berkowitz, and J.C. Gibbs Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 29 4 1983 399 410
13. K.L. Cho, and D.H. Jonassen The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving Educational Technology Research & Development 50 3 2002 5 22
14. C. Coffin, and K. O'Halloran Researching argumentation in educational contexts: new directions, new methods International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31 3 2008 219 227
15. J. Cohen Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences 2nd ed. 1988 Routledge
16. R. Driver, P. Newton, and J. Osborne Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms Science Education 84 3 2000 287 312
17. S. Erduran, S. Simon, and J. Osborne TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse Science Education 88 6 2004 915 933
18. B. Ertl, B. Kopp, and H. Mandl Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in case-based learning scenarios in videoconferencing Educational Computing Research 35 4 2006 377 397
19. B. Ertl, M. Reiserer, and H. Mandl Fostering collaborative learning in videoconferencing: the influence of content schemes and collaboration scripts on collaboration outcomes and individual learning outcomes Education, Communication & Information 5 2 2005 147 166
20. X. Ge, and S.M. Land A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions Educational Technology Research & Development 52 2 2004 5 22
21. H.P. Grice Logik und Konversation G. Meggle, Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung 1979 Suhrkamp Frankfurt 243 265
22. G.W.F. Hegel The logic of Hegel (W. Wallace, Trans.) 1975 Clarendon Press Oxford
23. M. Inwood Hegel and the hermetic tradition International Philosophical Quarterly 42 3 2002 399 401
24. A.C. Jeong The effects of conversational language on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation Instructional Science 34 5 2006 367 397
25. A.C. Jeong, and S. Frazier How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported collaborative argumentation British Journal of Educational Technology 39 5 2008 875 887
26. P. Jermann, and P. Dillenbourg Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script P. Dillenbourg, Learning to argue Vol. 1 2003 Kluwer Dordrecht, the Netherlands 205 226
27. J. Joiner, S. Jones, and J. Doherty Two studies examining argumentation in asynchronous computer mediated communication International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31 3 2008 243 255
28. D.H. Jonassen, and B. Kim Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines Educational Technology Research & Development 58 4 2010 439 457
29. I. Kollar, F. Fischer, and F.W. Hesse Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis Educational Psychology Review 18 2 2006 159 185
30. I. Kollar, F. Fischer, and D.J. Slotta Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning Learning & Instruction 17 6 2007 708 721
31. S. Leitão The potential of argument in knowledge building Human Development 43 6 2000 332 360
32. S. Leitão Evaluating and selecting counterarguments Written Communication 20 3 2003 269 306
33. Loll, F. (2012). Domain-independent support for computer-based education of argumentation skills. PhD Thesis. Clausthal University of Technology, Department of Informatics.
34. G.A. Magee Hegel and the hermetic tradition 2001 Cornell University Press
35. S. McAllister, A. Ravenscroft, and E. Scanlon Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 3 2004 194 204
36. B.M. McLaren, O. Scheuer, and J. Mikšátko Supporting collaborative learning and e-Discussions using artificial intelligence techniques International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 20 1 2010 1 46
37. S. Mitchell, P. Prior, R. Bilbro, K. Peake, B.H. See, and R. Andrews A reflexive approach to interview data in an investigation of argument International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31 3 2008 229 241
38. O. Noroozi, H.J.A. Biemans, M.C. Busstra, M. Mulder, and M. Chizari Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health Computers in Human Behavior 27 1 2011 309 318
39. O. Noroozi, H.J.A. Biemans, M.C. Busstra, M. Mulder, V. Popov, and M. Chizari Effects of the Drewlite CSCL platform on students' learning outcomes A. Juan, T. Daradoumis, M. Roca, S.E. Grasman, J. Faulin, Collaborative and distributed e-research: Innovations in technologies, strategies and applications 2012 276 289
40. O. Noroozi, M.C. Busstra, M. Mulder, H.J.A. Biemans, H. Tobi, and M.M.E.E. Geelen Online discussion compensates for suboptimal timing of supportive information presentation in a digitally supported learning environment Educational Technology Research & Development 60 2 2012 193 221
41. O. Noroozi, A. Weinberger, H.J.A. Biemans, M. Mulder, and M. Chizari Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL). A systematic review and synthesis of fifteen years of research Educational Research Review 7 2 2012 79 106
42. S. North, C. Coffin, and A. Hewings Using exchange structure analysis to explore argument in text-based computer conferences International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31 3 2008 257 276
43. E.M. Nussbaum, K. Hartley, G.M. Sinatra, R.E. Reynolds, and L.D. Bendixen Personality interactions and scaffolding in on-line discussions Journal of Educational Computing Research 30 1 & 2 2004 113 137
44. N. Pinkwart, V. Aleven, K. Ashley, and C. Lynch Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques M. Ikeda, K. Ashley, T.W. Chan, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (ITS 2006) 2006 Springer Berlin 227 236
45. N. Pinkwart, V. Aleven, K. Ashley, and C. Lynch Evaluating legal argument instruction with graphical representations using largo R. Luckin, K.R. Koedinger, J. Greer, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AI-ED 2007) 2007 IOS Amsterdam 101 108
46. A. Ravenscroft Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 6 2007 453 465
47. A. Ravenscroft Dialogue and connectivism: a new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12 3 2011 139 160
48. A. Ravenscroft, and S. McAlister Digital games and learning in cyberspace: a dialogical approach E-Learning and Digital Media 3 1 2006 37 50
49. A. Ravenscroft, and S. McAlister Investigating and promoting educational argumentation: towards new digital practices International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31 3 2008 317 335
50. A. Ravenscroft, and R.M. Pilkington Investigation by design: developing dialogue models to support reasoning and conceptual change International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11 1 2000 273 298
51. A. Ravenscroft, R.B. Wegerif, and J.R. Hartley Reclaiming thinking: dialectic, dialogic and learning in the digital age J. Underwood, J. Dockrell, Learning through digital technologies British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series 2 5 2007 39 57
52. B.J. Reiser Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 3 2004 273 304
53. N. Rummel, and H. Spada Learning to collaborate: an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 2 2005 201 241
54. N. Rummel, H. Spada, and S. Hauser Learning to collaborate from being scripted or from observing a model International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 26 4 2009 69 92
55. T. Schellens, H. Van Keer, B. De Wever, and M. Valcke Scripting by assigning roles: does it improve knowledge construction in asynchoronous discussion groups? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 2-3 2007 225 246
56. O. Scheuer, F. Loll, N. Pinkwart, and B.M. McLaren Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the art International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5 1 2010 43 102
57. B.B. Schwarz, Y. Neuman, and S. Biezuner Two wrongs may make a right. If they argue together! Cognition & Instruction 18 4 2000 461 494
58. S. Simon Using Toulmin's argument pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31 3 2008 277 289
59. K. Stegmann, C. Wecker, A. Weinberger, and F. Fischer Collaborative argumentation and cognitive processing in computer-supported collaborative learning environment Instructional Science 40 2 2012 297 323
60. K. Stegmann, A. Weinberger, and F. Fischer Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 4 2007 421 447
61. K. Stegmann, A. Weinberger, and F. Fischer Aktives Lernen durch Argumentieren: Evidenz für das Modell der argumentativen Wissenskonstruktion in Online-Diskussionen Unterrichtswissenschaft 39 3 2011 231 244
62. B.S. Stein, and J.D. Bransford Constraints on effective elaboration: effects of precision and subject generation Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 6 1979 769 777
63. B.G. Tabachnick, and L.S. Fidell Using multivariate statistics 2nd ed. 2007 Pearson Boston
64. S. Teasley Talking about reasoning: how important is the peer in peer collaboration? L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, B. Burge, Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition 1997 Springer Berlin 361 384
65. S. Toulmin The uses of argument 1958 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
66. M. Van Amelsvoort, J. Andriessen, and G. Kanselaar Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: how dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 4 2007 485 521
67. F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, and F.S. Henkemans Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments 1996 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
68. F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, and T. Kruiger Handbook of argumentation theory: A critical survey of classical backgrounds and modern studies 1987 Foris Publications Dordrecht
69. J.F. Voss, S.W. Tyler, and L.A. Yengo Individual differences in the solving of social science problems R.F. Dillon, R.R. Schmeck, Individual differences in cognition 1983 Academic Press New York 204 232
70. J.F. Voss, and J.A. Van Dyke Argumentation in psychology: background comments Discourse Processes 32 2-3 2001 89 111
71. D. Walsh Hegel and the hermetic tradition The Review of Metaphysics 59 2 2005 440 442
72. D.N. Walton The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies Synthese 123 3 2000 327 346
73. D.N. Walton, and E.C.W. Krabbe Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning 1995 State University of New York Press Albany, NY
74. R. Wegerif, B.M. McLaren, M. Chamrada, O. Scheuer, N. Mansour, and J. Mikšátko Exploring creative thinking in graphically mediated synchronous dialogues Computers & Education 54 3 2010 613 621
75. A. Weinberger Principles of transactive computer-supported collaboration scripts Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 6 3 2011 189 203
76. A. Weinberger, B. Ertl, F. Fischer, and H. Mandl Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning Instructional Science 33 1 2005 1 30
77. A. Weinberger, and F. Fischer A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning Computers & Education 46 1 2006 71 95
78. A. Weinberger, K. Stegmann, and F. Fischer Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: concepts and assessment Learning & Instruction 17 4 2007 416 426
79. T. Yiong-Hwee, and D. Churchill Using sentence openers to support students' argumentation in an online learning environment Educational Media International 44 3 2007 207 218