Other-regulation in collaborative groups: implications for regulation quality

Instructional Science

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 879-904

  Rogat, Toni Kempler ^a   Adams Wiggins, Karlyn R ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Group work; Inquiry based science; Social regulation; Socially shared regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919415466     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: 15731952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-014-9322-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences,9, 403–436.
2. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,12, 307–359.
3. Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34, 1039–1065.
4. Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chinn, C. A., & Buckland, L. A. (2011). Differences in epistemic practices among scientists, young earth creationists, intelligent design creationists, and the scientist creationists of Darwin’s era. In R. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy (pp. 38–76). New York: Taylor & Francis.
6. Chinn, C. A., Duschl, R. A., & Duncan, R. G., Buckland, L. A., Pluta, W. P. (2008). A microgenetic classroom study of learning to reason scientifically through modeling and argumentation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on International Conference for the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.
7. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
8. Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction,22, 467–498.
9. Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S. M., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology,98, 766–776.
10. DiDonato, N. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science,41, 25–47.
11. Duncan, R. G., Freidenreich, H. B., Chinn, C. A., & Bausch, A. (2011). Promoting middle-school students’ understanding of molecular genetics. Research in Science Education,41, 147–167.
12. Eilam, B., & Aharon, I. (2003). Students’ planning in the process of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology,28, 304–334.
13. Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record,113, 240–264.
14. Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36, 1085–1109.
15. Hogan, K. (2001). Collective Metacognition: The interplay of individual, social, and cultural meanings in small groups’ reflective thinking. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research, Vol 7. (pp.199–239). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
16. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction,17, 379–432.
17. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and instruction,21, 379–393.
18. Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record,113, 350–374.
19. Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist,45, 15–27.
20. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and students well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology,24, 330–358.
21. Kempler, T. M. & Linnenbrink, E. A. (2004, April). Re-examining the influence of competition structures in group contexts: Implications for social and cognitive interactions in small groups. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
22. Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction,9, 449–473.
23. Levy, I., Kaplan, A., & Patrick, H. (2004). Early adolescents’ achievement goals, social status, and attitudes towards cooperation with peers. Social Psychology of Education,7, 127–159.
24. McCaslin, M., Vega, R. I., Anderson, E. E., Calderon, C. N., & Labistre, A. M. (2011). Tabletalk: Navigating and negotiating in small-group learning. In D. M. McInerney, R. A. Walker, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning an motivation: Looking back, looking forward (pp. 191–222). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
25. NRC. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. In R. Duschl, H. Schweingruber, & H. Shouse (Eds.), Washington. DC: National Academy Press.
26. O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 781–802). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Panadero, E. & Järvelä, S. (2014). Reviewing findings on socially shared regulation of learning (submitted).
28. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
29. Pintrich, P. R., Conley, A. M., & Kempler, T. M. (2003). Current issues in achievement goal theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research,39, 319–337.
30. Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction,29, 375–415.
31. Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Understanding the quality variation of socially shared regulation: A focus on methodology. In M. Vauras & S. Volet (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 102–125). London: Routledge.
32. Rogat, T. K., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & DiDonato, N. (2013). Motivation in collaborative groups. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 250–267). London: Routledge.
33. Rogat, T. K., Witham, S. A., & Chinn, C. A. (in press). Teachers’ autonomy relevant practices within an inquiry-based science curricular context: Extending the range of academically significant autonomy supportive practices. Teachers College Record.
34. Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction—What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist,10, 199–208.
35. Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2010). Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: evidence from observations and self-reports. European Journal of Psychology of Education,25, 473–492.
36. Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia,46, 19–37.
37. Volet, S. (2001). Understanding learning and motivation in context: A multi-dimensional and multi-level cognitive–situative perspective. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 57–82). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.
38. Volet, S., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research & Development,25, 341–356.
39. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009a). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction,19, 128–143.
40. Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009b). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist,44, 215–226.
41. Volet, S., & Summers, M. (2013). Interpersonal regulation in collaborative learning activities: Reflections on emerging research methodologies. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (pp. 204–220). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group.
42. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.