Defining twenty-first century skills

Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 17-66

  Binkley, Marilyn ^a   Erstad, Ola ^b   Herman, Joan ^c   Raizen, Senta ^d   Ripley, Martin ^d   Miller Ricci, May ^e   Rumble, Mike ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d World Class Arena Limited   (United Kingdom)

^e WestEd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930985906     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., & Freeman, C. (2005). National Assessment Program: ICT literacy years 6 & 10 report. Carlton South, Australia: The Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA).
2. Ainley, J., Pratt, D., & Hansen, A. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design. British Educational Research Journal, 32 (1), 23-38.
3. Anderson, R. (2009, April). A plea for '21st Century Skills' white paper to include social and civic values. Memorandum to Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills Conference, San Diego, CA.
4. Baker, E. L. (2007). The end(s) of testing. Educational Researcher, 36 (6), 309-317.
5. Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193.
6. Banaji, S., & Burn, A. (2007). Rhetorics of creativity. Commissioned by Creative Partnerships. Retrieved November 30, 2009 www.creative-partnerships.com/literaturereviews
7. Bell, A., Burkhardt, H., & Swan, M. (1992). Balanced assessment of mathematical performance. In R. Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Washington, DC: AAAS.
8. Bennett, R. E. (2002). Inexorable and inevitable: The continuing story of technology and assessment. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1 (1), 14-15.
9. Bennett, R. E., & Gitomer, D. H. (2009). Transforming K-12 assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Assessment issues of the 21st Century. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
10. Bennett, R. E., Jenkins, F., Persky, H., & Weiss, A. (2003). Assessing complex problem solving performances. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 347-360.
11. Black, P., McCormick, R., James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Learning how to learn and assessment for learning: A theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education, 21 (2), 119-132.
12. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7-71.
13. Boeijen, G., & Uijlings, P. (2004, July). Exams of tomorrow: Use of computers in Dutch national science exams. Paper presented at the GIREP Conference, Teaching and learning physics in new contexts, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
14. Buckingham, D., & Willett, R. (Eds.). (2006). Digital generations: Children, young people, and new media. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Burbules, N. C., & Silberman-Keller, D. (2006). Learning in places: The informal education reader. New York: Peter Lang.
16. Çakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4 (2), 115-149.
17. Cassell, J., Huffaker, D., Ferriman, K., & Tversky, D. (2006). The language of online leadership: Gender and youth engagement on the Internet. Developmental Psychology, 42 (3), 436-449.
18. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society (The information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. 1). Cambridge: Blackwell.
19. Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Clift, S. (2002). 21st literacy summit white paper. Retrieved from www.mail-archive.com/do-wire@tc.umn.edu/msg00434.html
21. Deakin Crick, R. D., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 247-318.
22. Draper, S. W. (2009). Catalytic assessment: Understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (2), 285-293.
23. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 21-55). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Erstad, O. (2006). A new direction? Digital literacy, student participation and curriculum reform in Norway. Education and Information Technologies, 11 (3-4), 415-429.
25. Erstad, O. (2008). Trajectories of remixing: Digital literacies, media production and schooling. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 177-202). New York: Peter Lang.
26. Erstad, O. (2010). Conceptions of technology literacy and fluency. In International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
27. Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). Millbrae: California Academic Press.
28. Forster, M., & Masters, G. (2004). Bridging the conceptual gap between classroom assessment and system accountability. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: 103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Friedman, T. (2007). The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
30. Gardner, J. (Ed.). (2006). Assessment & learning. London: Sage Publications.
31. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Gick, M., & Holyoak, K. (1983). Scheme induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15 (1), 1-38.
33. Gipps, C., & Stobart, G. (2003). Alternative assessment. In T. Kellaghan & D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 549-576). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Harlen, W. (2006). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment & learning (pp. 61-80). London: Sage Publications.
36. Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 169-208.
37. Herman, J. L. (2008). Accountability and assessment In the service of learning: Is public interest in K-12 education being served? In L. Shepard & K. Ryan (Eds.), The future of testbased accountability. New York: Taylor & Francis.
38. Herman, J. L., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Making benchmark testing work. Educational Leadership, 63 (3), 48-55.
39. Herman, J. L., & Baker, E. L. (2009). Assessment policy: Making sense of the babel. In D. Plank, G. Sykes, & B. Schneider (Eds.), AERA handbook on education policy. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
40. Hof, R. D. (2007, August 20). Facebook's new wrinkles: The 35-and-older crowd is discovering its potential as a business tool. Business Week. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07-34/b4047050.htm
41. Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Analogy. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 117-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). School's out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
43. International ICT Literacy Panel. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
44. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
45. Johnson, M., & Green, S. (2004). Online assessment: The impact of mode on student performance. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Manchester, UK.
46. Koretz, D., Broadfoot, P., & Wolf, A. (Eds.). (1998). Assessment in Education: Principles, policy & practice (Special issue: Portfolios and records of achievement). London: Taylor & Francis.
47. Kozma, R. B. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene: International Society for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
48. Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4 (1), 5-20.
49. Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1 (1).
50. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin Press.
51. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420-432.
52. Loader, B. (Ed.). (2007). Young citizens in the digital age: Political engagement, young people and new media. London: Routledge.
53. Loveless, A. (2007). Creativity, technology and learning. (Update.) Retrieved November 30, 2009 http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/literature-reviews/Literature-Review382
54. McFarlane, A. (2001). Perspectives on the relationships between ICT and assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 227-234.
55. McFarlane, A. (2003). Assessment for the digital age. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 261-266.
56. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. London: Routledge.
57. National Center on Education and the Economy. (1998). New standards: Performance standards and assessments for the schools. Retrieved at http://www.ncee.org/store/products/index.jsp?setProtocol=true&stSection=1
58. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
59. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, United States Public Law 107-110.
60. Nunes, C. A. A., Nunes, M. M. R., & Davis, C. (2003). Assessing the inaccessible: Metacognition and attitudes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 375-388.
61. O'Neil, H. F., Chuang, S., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2003). Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 361-374.
62. OECD. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD Publishing.
63. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
64. Poggio, J., and Glasnapp, D. R., Yang, X., & Poggio, A. J. (2005). A comparative evaluation of score results from computerized and paper and pencil mathematics testing in a large scale state assessment program. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3 (6). Available from. http://www.jtla.org, 4-30
65. Pommerich, M. (2004). Developing computerized versions of paper-and-pencil tests: Mode effects for passage-based tests. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2 (6).
66. Quellmalz, E. S., & Kozma, R. (2003). Designing assessments of learning with technology. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 389-408.
67. Quellmalz, E., Kreikemeier, P., DeBarger, A. H., & Haertel, G. (2007). A study of the alignment of the NAEP, TIMSS, and New Standards Science Assessments with the inquiry abilities in the National Science Education Standards. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 9-13, Chicago, IL
68. Raikes, N., & Harding, R. (2003). The horseless carriage stage: Replacing conventional measures. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 267-278.
69. Ridgway, J., & McCusker, S. (2003). Using computers to assess new educational goals. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10 (3), 309-328.
70. Ridgway, J., McCusker, S., & Pead, D. (2004). Literature review of e-assessment (report 10). Bristol: Futurelab.
71. Ripley, M. (2007). E-assessment: An update on research, policy and practice. Bristol: Futurelab. Retrieved November 30, 2009 http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/literature-reviews/Literature-Review204
72. Ripley, M. (2009). JISC case study: Automatic scoring of foreign language textual and spoken responses. Available at http://www.dur.ac.uk/smart.centre1/jiscdirectory/media/JISC%20Case%20Study%20-%20Languages%20-%20v2.0.pdf
73. Ripley, M., & Tafler, J. (2009). JISC case study: Short answer marking engines. Available at http://www.dur.ac.uk/smart.centre1/jiscdirectory/media/JISC%20Case%20Study%20-%20Short%20Text%20-%20v2.0.pdf
74. Rumpagaporn, M. W., & Darmawan, I.N. (2007). Student's critical thinking skills in a Thai ICT schools pilot project. International Education Journal, 8 (2), 125-132. Retrieved November 30, 2009 http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/44551
75. Russell, M. (1999). Testing on computers: A follow-up study comparing performance on computer and on paper. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7 (20). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n20
76. Russell, M., & Haney, W. (2000). Bridging the gap between testing and technology in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (19). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n19.html
77. Russell, M., Goldberg, A., & O'Connor, K. (2003). Computer-based testing and validity: A look into the future. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 279-294.
78. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). Initial Findings from the IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study. Amsterdam: IEA.
80. Sefton-Green, J., & Sinker, R. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people. London: Routledge.
81. Shepard, L. (2007). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. In C. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 279-304). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82. Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, D., & Rust, R. (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
83. Shephard, K. (2009). E is for exploration: Assessing hard-to-measure learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (2), 386-398.
84. Somekh, B., & Mavers, D. (2003). Mapping learning potential: Students' conceptions of ICT in their world. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 409-420.
85. Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 215-266). San Diego: Academic.
86. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, (34) 273-286.
87. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.
88. Voogt, J., & Pelgrum, W. J. (2003). ICT and the curriculum. In R. B. Kozma (Ed.), Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective (pp. 81-124). Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
89. Wall, D. (2005). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching (Studies in Language Testing, Vol. 22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Walton, S. (2005). The eVIVA project: Using e-portfolios in the classroom. BETT. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from www.qca.org.uk/downloads/10359-eviva-bett-2005.pdf
91. Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (Eds.). (2003). Designing for change in networked learning environments: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
92. Webb, N.L. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states (Research Monograph No. 18). Madison: National Institute for Science Education.
93. Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (2004). Thinking and learning with ICT: Raising achievement in primary classrooms. London: Routledge Falmer.
94. Whitelock, D., with contributions from Road, M., & Ripley, M. (2007). Effective practice with e-Assessment. The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), UK. Retrieved November 30, 2009 http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/documents/pub-eassesspracticeguide.aspx
95. Williams, J. B., & Wong, A. (2009). The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book, open-web exams. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (2), 227-236.
96. Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: an embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13 (2), 181-208.
97. Woodward, H., & Nanlohy, P. (2004). Digital portfolios in pre-service teacher education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 167-178.