Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 287-315

  Kuhn, Deanna ^a   Shaw, Victoria ^b   Felton, Mark ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000399735     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Damon, W. (1990). Social relations and children's thinking skills. In D. Kuhn (Ed.), Contributions to human development: Vol. 21. Developmental perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills (pp. 95-107). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
3. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York: Heath.
4. Furth, H. (1992). The developmental origins of human societies. In H. Beilin & P. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 251-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Furth, H., & Kane, S. (1992). Children constructing society: A new perspective on children at play. In H. McGurk (Ed.), Childhood social development (pp. 149-173). Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Kruger, A. (1993). Peer collaboration: Conflict, cooperation, or both? Social Development, 2/3, 165-180.
7. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Kuhn, D., & Lao, J. (1996). Effects of evidence on attitudes: Is polarization the norm? Psychological Science, 7, 115-120.
9. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science, 5, 289-296.
10. Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
11. Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
12. Miller, A. G., McHoskey, J. W., Bane, C. M., & Dowd, T. G. (1993). The attitude polarization phenomenon: Role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 561-574.
13. National Education Association, Educational Policies Commission. (1961). The central purpose of American education. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Perkins, D., Allen, R., & Hafner, J. (1983). Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In W. Maxwell (Ed.), Thinking: The expanding frontier (pp. 177-189). Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
15. Rogoff, B. (in press). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed.). New York. Wiley.
16. Tesser, A., Martin, L., & Mendolia, M. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 73-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Wilson, T., & Schooler, J. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
19. Youniss, J., & Damon, W. (1992). Social construction in Piaget's theory. In H. Beilin & P. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 267-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.