Knowledge co-construction - epistemic consensus or relational assent?

Affective Learning Together: Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 97-119

  DamŞa, Crina ^a   Ludvigsen, Sten ^a   Andriessen, Jerry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b Wise and Munro Learning Research   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889601600     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203069684     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Akkerman, S., Overdijk, M., Admiraal, W. and Simons, R. J. (2007) ‘Beyond imprisonment of meaning: Technology facilitating redefining’, Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 29-98.
2. Alpay, L., Giboin, A. and Dieng, R. (1998) ‘Accidentology: An example of problem solving by multiple agents with multiple representations’, in M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen and T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with Multiple Representations. Amsterdam: Pergamon, pp. 152-74.
3. Andriessen, J., Baker, M. and Van der Puil, C. (2011) ‘Socio-cognitive tension in collaborative working relations’, in Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I. and Saljo, R., Learning acrossSites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices, Routledge in the Early learning series.
4. Baker, M. J. (1995) ‘Negotiation in collaborative problem-solving dialogues’, in R. J., Beun, M. J. Baker and M. Reiner (Eds.), Dialogue and Instruction: Modeling Interaction in IntelligentTutoring Systems, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 39-55.
5. Baker, M. J. (1999) ‘Argumentation and constructive interaction’, in G. Rijlaarsdam and E. Espéret (Series Eds.) and Pierre Coirier and Jerry Andriessen (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 5. Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing, Amsterdam: University ofAmsterdam Press, pp. 179-202.
6. Baker, M. J. (2009) ‘Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge’, in N. M. Mirza and A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and Education: TheoreticalFoundations and Practices, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 127-44.
7. Barab, S. A., and Plucker, J. A. (2002) ‘Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning’, EducationalPsychologist, 37(3), 165-82.
8. Barron, B. (2000) ‘Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups’, TheJournal of the Learning Sciences,9, 403-36.
9. Barron, B. (2003) When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
10. Crook, C. K. (2000) ‘Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning’, in R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner and D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking Collaborative Learning. London: Free Association Press, pp. 161-78.
11. De Dreu, C. K. W. and Weingart, L. R. (2003) ‘Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-9.
12. Engeström, Y. (1999) ‘Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice’, in Y. Engeström, M. R. Miettinen and R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Engle, R. A. and Conant, F. C. (2002) ‘Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom’, Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
14. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K. and Pressley, M. (2000) ‘Discourse patterns and collaborative scien-tific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions’, Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379-432.
15. Furberg, A. and Ludvigsen, S. R. (2008) ‘Students’ meaning-making of socioscientific issues in computer mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories’, International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1775-99.
16. Furberg, A. (2010) ‘Scientific inquiry in web-based learning environments: Exploring technological, epistemic and institutional aspects of student’s meaning making’ Doctoral thesis. University of Oslo, Norway.
17. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. A., Joseph, P. and Magliano, J. P. (1995) ‘Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 495-522.
18. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A. and Duschl, R. A. (2000) ‘Doing the lesson’ or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics’, Science Education, 84(6), 757-92.
19. Krange, I. and Ludvigsen, S. (2009) ‘The situated and historical nature of CSCL-Implications for design experiments’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 268-79.
20. Lemke, J. L. (1990) Talking Science. Language, Learning, and Values, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
22. Linell, P. (2009) Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and ContextualTheories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
23. Ludvigsen, S., Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., Moen, A. and Middleton, D. (2011) ‘Multiplicity and intersecting trajectories of participation: temporality and learning’, in S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen and R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures andPractices, Routledge in the Early learning series.
24. Ludvigsen, S. (2010) ‘Sociogenesis and cognition: the struggle between social and cognitive activities’, in B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus and R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation ofknowledge through classroom interaction, Routledge in the Early learning series.
25. Mäkitalo, Å. (2003) Accounting practices as situated learning: Dilemmas and dynamics in institutional categorization’, Discourse Studies 5, 495-516.
26. Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S. (1995) ‘The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving’, in C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
27. Säljö, R. (2002) ‘My brain’s running slow today. The preference for “things ontologies” in research and everyday discourse on human thinking’, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, 389-405.
28. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J. and Ilya, M. (2003) ‘Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity’, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 219-56.
29. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D. (2006) ‘Computer-supported collaborative learning’, in R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 409-26.
30. Valsiner, J. (2002) ‘Beyond social representations: A theory of enablement’ Invited lecture presented at the 6th conference on social representations, August, Stirling., UK.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1930).
32. Wickman, P. O. and Östman, L. (2002) Learning as Discourse Change: A Sociocultural Mechanism, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
33. Yin, R. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. (3rd edn), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.