Analyzing collaboration

The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 191-212

  Enyedy, Noel ^a   Stevens, Reed ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954145506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.013     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., et al. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1-46.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Transcription notation. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social interaction (pp. ix-xvi). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
4. Barron, B., Pea, R., & Engle, R. (2013). Advancing understanding of collaborative learning with data derived from video records. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 203-219). New York: Routledge.
5. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W, & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
6. Cazden, C. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on teaching. Third Edition. (pp. 432-460). New York: Macmillan.
7. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
8. Cobb, P. (2002). Reasoning with tools and inscriptions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 187-216.
9. Cobb, P, Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-163.
10. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (Eds.) (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students: relationship with each other and with concepts. Cognition & Instruction, 22(4), 467-498.
12. Cress, U., & Hesse, F. (2013). Quantitative methods for studying small groups. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 93-111). New York: Routledge.
13. Dillenbourg, P, Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier.
14. Duranti, A. (2006). Transcripts, like shadows on a wall. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(4), 301-310.
15. Ellis, A. (2007). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 221-262.
16. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(34), 399-483.
17. Enyedy, N. (2003). Knowledge construction and collective practice: At the intersection of learning, talk, and social configurations in a computer-mediated mathematics classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (3), 361-408.
18. Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427-466.
19. Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & Fields, D. (2011). Negotiating the "relevant" in culturally relevant mathematics. Canadian Journal for Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 11(3), 273-291.
20. Enyedy, N., Rubel, L., Castellon, V., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Esmond, I. (2008). Revoicing in a multilingual classroom: Learning implications of discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(2), 134-162.
21. Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153-182). New York: Academic.
22. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Third Edition. (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
23. Erickson, F. (1996). Going for the zone: The social and cognitive ecology of teacher-student interaction in classroom conversations. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29-62). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in educational research. Third Edition. (pp. 177-191). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
25. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Forman, E., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M., & Brown, C. (1998). "You’re going to want to find out which and prove it": Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8, 527-548.
27. Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5-21.
28. Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of seeing, visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157-187). London: Sage.
29. Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90-116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1987). Children’s arguing. In S. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200-248). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283-307.
32. Hall, R., Stevens, R., & Torralba, A. (2002). Disrupting representational infrastructure in conversations across disciplines. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 179-210.
33. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2000). Knowledge recycling: Crisscrossing the landscape of educational psychology in a problem-based learning course for preservice teachers. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 11, 41-56.
34. Howley, I., Mayfield, E., & Rose, C. (2013). Linguistic analysis methods for studying small groups. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 184-202). New York: Routledge.
35. Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
37. Ito, M., Horst, H. J., Finn, M., Law, L., Manion, A., Mitnick, S., Schlossberg, D., & Yardi, S. (2010). Hanging out, messing around and geeking out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Group awareness tools: It’s what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1046-1058.
39. Jeong, A. (2005). A guide to analyzing message-response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer mediated communication. Distance Education, 26 (3), 367-383.
40. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44, 395-408.
41. Klein, J. D., & Pridemore, D. R. (1992). Effects of cooperative learning and need for affiliation on performance, time on task, and satisfaction: Educational Technology, Research and Development, 40(4), 39-47.
42. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Lee, C. D. (2001). Signifying in the Zone of Proximal Development. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 191-225). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
44. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 269-305). London: Cambridge University Press.
46. McDermott, R. P., & Hood (Holzman), L. (1982). Institutional psychology and the ethnography of schooling. In P. Gilmore & A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp. 232-249). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
47. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 33-59.
49. Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.) (2008). Exploring classroom talk. London: Sage.
50. Michaels, S. (2005). Can the intellectual affordances of working-class storytelling be leveraged in school? Human Development, 48, 136-145.
51. Nichols, J. D. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21 (4), 467-476.
52. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
53. O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328, 463-466.
55. Philips, S. (1983). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
56. Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (2011). Conversation analysis: An approach to the analysis of social interaction. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 165-190). London: Sage.
57. Puntambekar, S. (2013). Mixed methods for analyzing collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 220-230). New York: Routledge.
58. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235-276.
59. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
60. Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70-96). London: Berg.
61. Schoenfeld, A. H. (Ed.) (1992). Research methods in and for the learning sciences, a special issue of The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Volume 2, № 2.
62. Simon, H. A. (2001). Learning to research about learning. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 205-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Stevens, R. (2000). Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: Comparing computer and paper-supported activities across settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 373-401.
64. Stevens, R. (2010). Learning as a members’ phenomenon: Toward an ethnographically adequate science of learning. NSSE2010 Yearbook: A Human Sciences Approach to Research on Learning, 109(1), 82-97.
65. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L., & Bell, P. (2005). The comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present and future. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 125-157.
67. Strom, D., Kemeny, V, Lehrer, R., & Forman, E. (2001). Visualizing the emergent structure of children’s mathematical argument. Cognitive Science, 25, 733-773.
68. Sun, Y, Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38 (2), 247-271.
69. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers, students and science in linguistic minority classrooms. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 298-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
72. Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2003). The development of students’ learning in peer-directed small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 361-428.
73. Wells, G. (1993). Articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
74. Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1999). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account of the genesis of higher mental functions, Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments: Vygotsky’s theory (Vol. I, pp. 363-380). Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis /Routledge.
75. Wood, D. (1992). Teaching talk. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 203-214). London: Hodder & Stoughton (for the National Curriculum Council).