Group emotions: the social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 123-156

  Polo, Claire ^a   Lund, Kristine ^a   Plantin, Christian ^a   Niccolai, Gerald P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Collaboration; Emotions; Group cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966701354     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-016-9232-8     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amossy, R. (2006). L’argumentation dans le discours. Armand Colin.
2. Andriessen, J., Pardijs, M., Baker, M. (2013). Getting on and getting along: Tension in the developement of collaborations. In M. Baker, S. Järvelä, & J. Andriessen, (Eds) Affective Learning Together (pp. 205–228), Routledge.
3. Anscombre, J. C, Ducrot, O. (1997). L’argumentation dans la langue. Mardaga.
4. Asterhan, C. S. C. (2013). Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation. In M. Baker, S. Järvelä, & J. Andriessen, (Eds), Affective Learning Together (pp. 251–271), Routledge.
5. Baker, M., Quignard, M., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M. (2002). Designing a computer-supported collaborative learning situation for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 55–61), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
6. Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K. (2009). Socio-relational, affective and cognitive dimensions of CSCL interactions: Integrating theoretical-methodological perspectives. Proceedings of CSCL 2009 (2009, Rhodes, Greece). In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann and A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices (Vol II, pp. 31–33), International Society of the Learning Sciences.
7. Baker, M., Järvelä, S., Andriessen, J. (Eds) (2013). Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning. Routledge.
8. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1988). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
9. Caffi, C., & Janney, R. W. (1994). Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3–4), 325–373.
10. Cahour, B. (2013). Characteristics, emergence and circulation in interactional learning. In M. Baker, S. Järvelä, & J. Andriessen, (Eds), Affective Learning Together (pp. 52–70), Routledge.
11. Cosnier, J. (1994). Psychologie des émotions et des sentiments. Paris: Retz.
12. Denis, A., Quignard, M., Fréard, D., Détienne, F., Baker, M. (2012). Détection de conflits dans les communautés épistémiques en ligne. Proceedings of TALN 2012 (2012, Grenoble, France). In G. Antoniadis, H. Blanchon, G. Sérasset (Ed), Actes de la conférence conjointe JEP-TALN-RECITAL (pp. 351–358). Grenoble: GETALP-LIG.
13. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds), Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 275–301), Springer.
14. Fernández, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2002). Re-conceptualizing ‘scaffolding’ and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2/1), 40–54.
15. Gilbert, M. A. (2004). Emotion, argumentation and informal logic. Informal Logic, 24(3), 245–264.
16. Goffman, E. (1974). Les rites d’interaction. Paris: Minuit.
17. Gouran, D. S. (2004). Moving forward/Looking back: The functions of argument in inducing and managing conflict in decision-making and problem-solving groups. National Communication Association, Chicago, November.
18. Grize, J. B. (1996). Logique naturelle et communication. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
19. Grize, J. B. (1997 [1990]). Logique et langage. Ophrys.
20. Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Methuen.
21. Hekmat, I., Micheli, R., Rabatel, A. (2013). Modes de sémiotisation et fonctions argumentatives des émotions, Semen special issue, 35.
22. Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). regulating emotions together for motivated collaboration. In M. Baker, S. Järvelä, & J. Andriessen, (Eds) Affective Learning Together (pp. 162–181), Routledge.
23. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2006). Les personnes peuvent-elles agir sur la réalité ? La théorie critique et la marée noire du Prestige. In Legardez, A., & Simonneaux, L. (Eds), L’école à l’épreuve de l’actualité: Enseigner les questions vives (pp. 105–118), ESF Editeur.
24. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.
25. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.
26. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Psychology Press.
27. Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.
28. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111.
29. Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., Sohmer, R., & Resnick, L. (1992). Guided construction of knowledge in the classroom: Teacher, talk, task, and tools. The Reading Teacher, 46, 316–326.
30. Micheli, R. (2010). L’émotion augmentée: L’abolition de la peine de mort dans le débat parlementaire français. Cerf.
31. Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(3), 225–256.
32. Plantin, C. (2011). Les bonnes raisons des émotions: Principes et méthode pour l’étude du discours « émotionné ». Peter Lang.
33. Plantin, C. (2015). Emotion and affect. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 514–523). Boston: Wiley.
34. Plantin, C. (2016). Dictionnaire de l’argumentation - Une introduction notionnelle aux études d’argumentation. Lyon: ENS Editions.
35. Polo, C. (2014). L’eau à la bouche: Ressources et travail argumentatifs des élèves lors de débats socio-scientifiques sur l’eau potable. Etude comparée de 10 cafés scientifiques menés au Mexique, aux USA et en France, en 2011–2012. Doctoral dissertation, Lyon 2 University, Lyon, France.
36. Polo, C., Plantin, C., Lund, K., & Niccolai, G. (2013). Quand construire une position émotionnelle, c'est choisir une conclusion argumentative. Semen, 35, 41–63.
37. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Proceedings of CSCL 1995 (1995, Bloomington, IN). In C. O’Malley (Ed) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
39. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
40. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43–102.
41. Sins, P., & Karlgren, K. (2013). Identifying and overcoming tension in interdisciplinary teamwork in profesional development. In M. Baker, S. Järvelä, & J. Andriessen, (Eds) Affective Learning Together (pp. 185–203). Routledge.
42. Soussignan, R. (2002). Duchenne Smile, emotional experience, and automatic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2(1), 52–74.
43. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition. MIT Press Cambridge.
44. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge Univ Press.
45. Traverso, V. (1999). Négociation et argumentation dans la conversation familière. Escritos, 51–89.
46. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Walton, D N. (1992). The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania State University Press.
48. Wegerif, R. (2005). Reason and creativity in classroom dialogues. Language and Education, 19(3), 223–37.
49. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. Language and Education Library, 12, 49–64.
50. Wegerif, R., Littleton, K., Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Rowe, D. (2004). Widening access to educational opportunities through teaching children how to reason together. Westminster Studies in Education, 27(2), 143–156.
51. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
52. Wierzbicka, A. (1995). The relevance of language to the study of emotions. Psychological Inquiry, 6(3), 248–253.