Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 335-353

  Kreijns, Karel ^a   Kirschner, Paul A ^a   Jochems, Wim ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Computer supported collaborative learning; Social interaction

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PROGRAM PROCESSORS;

DISTRIBUTED LEARNING GROUPS (DLG);

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 0037407836     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2     Document Type: Short Survey

References (80)

1. Aronson E., Blaney N., Stephan G., Silkes J., Snapp M. The jigsaw classroom. 1978;Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
2. Berge Z. Computer conferencing and the on-line classroom. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 3(1):1997;3-21.
3. Brush T.A. Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development. 46(3):1998;5-18.
4. Burge E.J. Learning in computer conferenced context: the learners' perspective. Journal of Distance Education. 9(1):1994;19-43.
5. Clark, J. (2000). Collaboration tools in online learning. ALN Magazine, 4(1). [Accessed 17 June, 2002]. Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/magazine/Vol4_issue1/Clark.htm.
6. Cockburn, A. & Greenberg, S. (1993). Making contact: getting the group communicating with groupware. In Proceedings of the conference on organizational computing systems (COOCS '93) (pp. 31-41). Milpitas, CA: ACM Press.
7. Culnan M.J., Markus M.L. Information technologies. Jablin F.M., Putnam L.L., Roberts K.H., Porter L.W. Handbook of organizational communication: an interdisciplanary perspective. 1987;420-443 Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
8. Daft R.L., Lengel R.H. Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Staw B.M., Cummings L.L. Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6). 1984;191-233 JAI, Greenwich, CT.
9. Daft R.L., Lengel R.H., Trevino L. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance. MIS Quaterly. 11(3):1987;355-366.
10. Emans B., Koopman P., Rutte C., Steensma H. Teams in organisaties: interne en externe determinanten van resultaatgerichtheid [Teams in organizations: Internal and external determinants of result focus]. Gedrag en Organisatie. 9(6):1996;309-327.
11. Fishman, B. J. (1997). Students traits and the use of computer-mediated communication tools: what matters and why? Paper presented at the 1997 AERA Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
12. Forsyth D.R. Group dynamics (2nd ed.). 1990;Brooks & Cole, Belmont.
13. Garrison D.R. Quality and theory in distance education: theoretical consideration. Keegan D. Theoretical principles of distance education. 1993;Routledge, New York.
14. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., Archer W. Critical thinking and computer conferencing: a model and tool to access cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education. 15(1):2001;7-23.
15. Garton L., Wellman B. Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: a review of the research literature. Burleseon B.R. Communication yearbook (Vol. 18). 1995;438-453 Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
16. Gilbert L., Moore D.R. Building interactivity into web courses: tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology. 38(3):1998;29-35.
17. Gilroy, K. (2001). Collaborative E-learning: the right approach. ArsDigita Systems Journal. Availble: http://www.arsdigita.com/asj/elearning/ [accessed 17 June 2002].
18. Gunawardena C.N. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 1(2/3):1995;147-166.
19. Guanawardena C.N., Lowe X., Constance A., Anderson T. Analysis of a global debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of educational computing research. 17(4):1997;397-431.
20. Hallet, K., & Cummings, J. (1997). The virtual classroom as authentic experience. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning: Competition-Connection-Collaboration (pp. 103-107). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
21. Hiltz S.R. The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computer networks. 1994;Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ USA.
22. Hiltz, S. R. (1997). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: some preliminary results. Journal of Asynchoronous Learning Networks, 1(2). Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue2/hiltz.htm [accessed 17 June 2002].
23. Hiltz, S. R. (1998). Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: building learning communities. Invited Address at "WEB98″, Orlando, FL. Available: http://eies.njit.edu/̃hiltz/collaborative_learning_in_asynch.htm [accessed 17 June 2002].
24. Hiltz S.R., Johnson K., Turoff M. Experiments in group decision making: communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research. 13:1986;225-252.
25. Hobaugh, C. F. (1997). Interactive strategies for collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning: Competition-Connection-Collaboration (pp. 121-125). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
26. Hooper S., Hannafin M.J. The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development. 39(3):1991;27-40.
27. Jehng J.J. The psycho-social processes and cognitive effects of peer-based collaborative interactions with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 17(1):1997;19-46.
28. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Conflict in the classroom: controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research. 49:1979;51-70.
29. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Cooperation and learning: theory and research. 1989;Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.
30. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Creative and critical thinking through academic controversy. American behavioral scientist. 37(1):1993;40-53.
31. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). 1999;Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
32. Johnson R.T., Johnson D.W., Stanne M.B. Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 77(6):1985;668-677.
33. Jonassen D.H. Context is everything. Educational Technology. 31(6):1991;35-37.
34. Jonassen D.H. Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology. 34(4):1994;34-37.
35. Kearsley G. The nature and value of interaction in distance learning. (ACSDE Research Monograph No. 12). 1995;Pennsylvania State University, American Center for the Study of Distance Education, State College, Pennsylvania.
36. Keen, K. (1992). Competence: what is it and how can it be developed? In J. Lowyck, P. de Potter, J. Elen (Eds.), Instructional design: implementation issues (pp. 111-122). Brussels, Belgium: IBM Education Center.
37. Kerr N. The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 44:1983;78-94.
38. Kerr N., Bruun S. The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 5:1983;1-15.
39. Kiesler S., Siegel J., McGuire T.W. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist. 39:1984;1123-1134.
40. Kirschner P.A. Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction. 2(1):2001;1-10.
41. Kirschner P.A., van Vilsteren P., Hummel H., Wigman M. A study environment for acquiring academic and professional competence. Studies of Higher Education. 22(2):1997;151-171.
42. Latané B., Williams K., Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37:1979;822-832.
43. Lethinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: a review. CL-Net Project. Available: http://www.kas.utu.fi/clnet/clnetreport.html [accessed 17 June 2002].
44. Liaw S., Huang H. Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: a review of the literature. Educational Technology. 40(3):2000;41-45.
45. McConnell D. Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. 1994;Kogan Page Limited, London.
46. McCroskey J.C. Oral communication apprehension: a summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research. 4:1977;78-96.
47. Morrison D., Collins A. Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. Wilson B. Constructivist learning environments. 1996;107-119 Educational Technology Press, Englewood Cliffs.
48. Muirhead B. Attitudes toward interactivity in a distance education program: a qualitative analysis. 1999;Dissertation.com, Parkland, FL.
49. Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity in web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), 31-39.
50. Ohlsson S. Learning to do and learning to understand: a lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. Reimann P., Spada H. Learning in humans and machines. 1996;37-62 Pergamon, Oxford.
51. Olson G.M., Olson J.S. Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction. 15:2000;139-178.
52. Panitz, T. (1996). Collaborative versus cooperative learning. Available http://ericae.net/k12assess/colcoo.htm [accessed 17 June 2002].
53. Rice R.E. Contexts of research on organizational computer-mediated communication. Lea M. Contexts of computer-mediated communication. 1992;113-144 Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
54. Rice R.E. Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research. 19:1993;451-484.
55. Roschelle J., Teasley S. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. O'Malley C. Computer-supported collaborative learning. 1995;69-97 Springer-Verlag, New York.
56. Rourke, L. (2000a). Exploring social communication in computer conferencing. Unpublished Master Thesis. Alberta, Edmonton Alberta.
57. Rourke, L. (2000b). Operationalizing social interaction in computer conferencing. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual conference of the Canadian Association for Distance Education. Quebec City. Available: http://www.ulaval.ca/aced2000cade/english/proceedings.html [accessed 31 January, 2001].
58. Rourke L., Anderson T., Archer W., Garrison D.R. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based, computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education. 14(3):1999;51-70.
59. Rovai A.P. Classroom community at a distance: a comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs. Internet and Higher Education. 4:2001;105-118.
60. Short J., Williams E., Christie B. The social psychology of telecommunications. 1976;John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, London.
61. Sharan S., Sharan Y. Small group teaching. 1976;Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
62. Sharan Y., Sharan S. Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. 1992;Columbia University, New York.
63. Simonson M. Does anyone really want to learn... at a distance. TechTrends. 40(5):1995;12.
64. Slavin R.E. Using student team learning (3rd ed.). 1986;Center for Social Organization of Schools, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
65. Slavin R.E. Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research. 50(2):1990;315-342.
66. Slavin R.E. Educational psychology: theory and practice (5th ed.). 1997;Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
67. Soller, A. L. (1999). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. Unpublished Master Thesis.
68. Soller, A. L., & Lesgold, A., Linton, F., Goodman, B. (1999). What makes peer interaction effective? Modeling effective communication in an intelligent CSCL. In Proceedings of the 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium: Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems (pp. 116-123). Cape-Cod, MA.
69. Sproull L., Faraj S. Atheism, sex, and databases: the net as a social technology. Kiesler S. Culture of the internet. 1997;35-52 Lawrence Erlbaum and Assocs, Mahwah, NJ.
70. Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science. 32:1986;1492-1512.
71. Tu C.H. On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Application. 23(1):2000;27-37.
72. Van der Linden J., Renshaw P. Dialogic learning. 2001;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
73. Wagner E.D. In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education. 8(2):1994;6-29.
74. Wagner E.D. Interactivity: from agents to outcomes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 71:1997;19-26.
75. Walther J.B. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Communication Research. 19(1):1992;52-90.
76. Walther J.B. Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western-Journal of Communication. 57:1993;381-398.
77. Walther J.B. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research. 23(1):1996;3-43.
78. Walther J.B., Anderson J.F., Park D. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research. 19:1994;460-487.
79. Wegerif R. The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2(1):1998;34-49.
80. Zhang S., Fulford C.P. Are interaction time and psychological interactivity the same thing in the distance learning television classroom. Educational Technology. 34(6):1994;58-64.