Motivation in collaborative groups

The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 250-267

  Rogat, Toni Kempler ^a   Linnenbrink Garcia, Lisa ^b   DiDonato, Nicole ^c  

^a Rutgers University   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886476131     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837290-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2. Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 269-290.
5. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
6. Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34, 87-98.
7. Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (2006).Affective and motivational outcomes of working in collaborative groups. Educational Psychology, 26, 187-208.
9. Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43-54.
10. Ciani, K. D., Summers, J. J., Easter, M. A., & Sheldon, K. M. (2008). Collaborative learning and positive experiences: Does letting students choose their own groups matter? Educational Psychology, 28, 627-641.
11. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
12. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
13. Deutsch, M. (1949). An experimental study of the effects of co-operation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 197-292.
14. Dillenbourg P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
15. Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 597-610.
16. Dweck, C. & Leggett, E. (1988).A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
17. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
18. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
19. Fencl, H., & Scheel, K. (2004). Pedagogical approaches, contextual variables, and the development of student self-efficacy in undergraduate physic courses. In J. Marx, S. Franklin, & K. Cummings (Eds.), Physics Education Research Conference, AIP Conference Proceedings (720), 173-176, Melville, NY: AIP.
20. Fencl, H., & Scheel, K. (2005).Engaging students. An examination of the effects of teaching strategies on selfefficacy and course climate in a non-majors’ physics course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35, 20-24.
21. Freeman, J. G., McPhail, J. C., & Berndt, J. A. (2002). Sixth graders’ views of activities that do and do not help them learn. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 335-347.
22. Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy beliefs and group performance across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
23. Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187-194.
24. Greene, B. A. & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on course achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192.
25. Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
26. Hanze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 29-41.
27. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1-21.
28. Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: A stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 401-429.
29. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
30. Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. H. (2007). Exploring the links between students’ engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom. Learning & Instruction, 17, 673-687.
31. Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 359-388.
32. Jarvela, S., Volet, S., & Jarvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45, 15-27.
33. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Kaplan, A. (2004). Achievement goals and intergroup relations. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances of motivation and achievement: Motivating students, improving schools; The legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 97-136). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
35. Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569-581.
36. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 156-168.
37. Katz-Navon, T., & Erez, M. (2005).When collective- and self-efficacy affect team performance: The role of task interdependence. Small Group Research, 36, 437-465.
38. Kempler, T. M., Hruda, L. Z., & Maehr, M. L. (2003, April). Engaging students in cooperative learning tasks: Individual and group-level factors. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
39. Kempler, T. M., & Linnenbrink, E. A. (2004, April). Re-examining the influence of competition structures in group contexts: Implications for social and cognitive interactions in small groups. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
40. Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381-395.
41. Levy, I., Kaplan, A., & Patrick, H. (2004). Early adolescents’ achievement goals, social status, and attitudes towards cooperation with peers. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 127-159.
42. Linnenbrink E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197-213.
43. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect, and cognition. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 195-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
45. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online prublcation: doi:10.111/j.2044-8279.2012.02080.X.
46. Linnenbrink-Garcia, E. A., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 13-24.
47. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Tyson, D. F., & Patall, E. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at moderating factors. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 19-70.
48. Maehr, M. L. & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
49. Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77-104). New York: Routledge.
50. Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An under-explored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
51. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
52. Minnaert, A., Boekaerts, M., & deBrabander, C. (2007). Autonomy, competence, and social relatedness in task interest within project-based education. Psychological Reports, 101, 574 -586.
53. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424-436.
54. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38.
55. Nicholls, J. D. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning on achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 467-476.
56. Nicholls, J. D., & Miller, R. B. (1994).Cooperative learning and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 167-178.
57. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
58. Nolen, S. B. (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 219-270.
59. Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. (2008).Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. L. Maehr, S. A. Karabenick, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Social psychological perspectives (Vol. 15, pp. 425-460). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
60. O’Donnell, A. M., & O’Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 321-349.
61. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
62. Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K., & Midgley, C. (2001).Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 35-58.
63. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
64. Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group process. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 375-415.
65. Ruble, D., & Frey, K. (1991). Changing patterns of comparative behavior as skills are acquired: A functional model of self-evaluation. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 79-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
67. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). When rewards compete with nature: The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 13-54). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
68. Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197-222). New York: Routledge.
69. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Self-efficacy and competency beliefs in academic function. In A. J. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 281-303). New York: Guilford.
70. Shachar, H., & Fischer, S. (2004). Cooperative learning and the achievement of motivation and perceptions of students in 11th grade chemistry classes. Learning and Instruction, 14, 69-87.
71. Shamir, B. (1990). Calculations, values, and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation. Human Relations, 43, 313-332.
72. Sharan, S., & Shaulov, A. (1990). Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 173-202). New York: Praeger.
73. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71-81.
74. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
75. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research for the future: Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
76. Summers, J. S. (2006).Effects of collaborative learning in math on sixth graders’ individual goal orientations from a socioconstructivist perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 273-290.
77. Tan, I. G. C., Lee, C. K. E., & Sharan, S. (2007). Group investigation effects on achievement, motivation, and perceptions of students in Singapore. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 142-154.
78. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751-796.
79. Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007).The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 600-612.
80. Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Kersting, N., & Nemer, K. M. (2006). Help seeking in cooperative learning groups. In S. A. Karabenick & R. S. Newman (Eds.), Academic help seeking: Goals, groups and contexts (pp. 45-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
82. Weldon, E., & Weingart, L.R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 307-334.
83. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 933-1002). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.