Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-53

  Derry, Sharon J ^a   Pea, Roy D ^b   Barron, Brigid ^b   Engle, Randi A ^c   Erickson, Frederick ^d   Goldman, Ricki ^e   Hall, Rogers ^f   Koschmann, Timothy ^g   Lemke, Jay L ^h   Sherin, Miriam Gamoran ⁱ   Sherin, Bruce L ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

ⁱ NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950945417     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400903452884     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Advanced Distributed Learning. (2004). SCORM (4th ed.). U.S. Office of the Under Secretary for Defense Personnel and Readiness.
2. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2007). Teachers' gestures as a means of scaffolding students' understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 349-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Angelillo, C., Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (2007). Examining shared endeavors by abstracting video coding schemes with fidelity to cases. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 189-206). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ash, D. (2007). Using video data to capture discontinuous science meaning making in non-school settings. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 207-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 403-436.
8. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
9. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self sustained learning as catalysts for development. Human Development, 49, 193-224.
10. Bateson, M. C. (1989). Composing a life. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
11. Beardsley, L., Cogan-Drew, D., & Olivero, F. (2007). Video paper: Bridging research and practice for pre-service and experienced teachers. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 479-493). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Berman, F., Fox, G. C., & Hey, A. J. G. (2003). (Eds.). Grid computing: Making the global infrastructure a reality. New York: Wiley.
14. Borges, J. L. (1999). On exactitude in science. In A. Hurley (Trans.), Collected fictions (p. 35). New York: Penguin.
15. Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Carnegie Foundation for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). The gallery of teaching and learning. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/
18. Cherry, G., Fournier, J., & Stevens, R. (2003). Using a digital video annotation tool to teach dance composition. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2003/1/01/
19. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
20. Clancey, W. J. (in press). A transactional perspective on the practice-based science of teaching and learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), Theorizing learning practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Cobb, P., & Whitenack, J. W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom videorecordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 213-228.
22. Collaboration and Learning Laboratory (CaLL). (n.d.). Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www. siumed.edu/call/index.html
23. Creative Commons. (2009). Retrieved at http://creativecommons.org
24. Derry, S. J. (Ed.). (2007a). Guidelines for conducting video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel. Chicago: Data Research and Development Center. Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://drdc.uchicago.edu/what/video-research.html
25. Derry, S. J. (2007b). Video research in classroom and teacher learning: Standardize that! In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 305-320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2009). Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://dublincore.org/
27. Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1978). Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings. New York: Pergamon Press.
29. Engle, R. A., Conant, F. R., & Greeno, J. G. (2007). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-sup-ported research. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 239-254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Erickson, F. (1977). Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. Educational Anthropology Quarterly, 8(2), 58-69.
31. Erickson, F. (1982). Audiovisual records as a primary data source. Sociological Methods and Research, 11(2), 213-232.
32. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
33. Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
34. Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.
36. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
37. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
38. Geisler, G., Marchionini, G., Wildemuth, B., Hughes, A., Yang, M., Wilkens, T., et al. (2002). Video browsing interfaces for the open video project: Conference extended abstracts of CHI 2002 (pp. 514-515). New York: ACM Press.
39. GEM Exchange. (2009). Gateway to 21st century skills. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www. thegateway.org/
40. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
41. TM, an online digital video data analysis tool: Changing our perspectives as an interpretive community. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 507-520). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Goldman-Segall, R. (n.d.). Points of viewing children's thinking. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.pointsofviewing.com/
44. Goldman-Segall, R. (1994). Challenges facing researchers using multimedia tools. Computer Graphics, 28(1), 48-52.
45. Goldman-Segall, R. (1998). Points of viewing children's thinking: A digital ethnographer's journey. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Goodenough, F. L. (1928). Measuring behavior traits by means of repeated short samples. Journal of Juvenile Research, 12, 230-235.
47. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
48. Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237-279.
49. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
50. Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 217-242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Goodwin, C. (n.d.). Charles Goodwin. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/ clic/cgoodwin/projects.htm
52. Gore, A. (2007). The assault on reason. New York: Penguin Press.
53. Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. (2002). Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century. Family Process, 41, 159-197.
54. Hall, R. (2000). Video recording as theory. In A. Kelley & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647-664). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Hammer, D., & van Zee, E. (2006). Seeing the science in children's thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science, a staff developer's guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
56. Harrison, B. L., & Baecker, R. M. (1992). Designing video annotation and analysis systems. In K. S. Booth & A. Fournier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Graphics Interface '92, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 157-166). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
57. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
58. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (2008). Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.jove.com/
59. Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1999). Meaning making [Special issue]. Discourse Processes, 27(2).
60. Koschmann, T., Glenn, P., & Conlee, M. (1999). Theory presentation and assessment in a problem-based learning group. Discourse Processes, 27, 119-133.
61. Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretive positionings. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 64-86.
62. Leacock, R. (1973). Technology and reality at the movies. Technological Review, 75(4), 2-7.
63. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 635-679.
64. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(4), 273-290.
65. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316.
66. Leonard, M. J. (2006). What's the science behind it? Models and modeling in a design for science curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
67. Leonard, M. J., & Derry, S. J. (2006). Tensions and tradeoffs in a design for science classroom: The forces in balloon lecture. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 411-417). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Re-search for Better Schools.
69. Lewis, M., & Rosenblum, L. (1974). The effect of the infant on its caregiver. New York: Wiley.
70. Lu, J., & Rose, R. (2003). Seeing math through multimedia case studies. Concord, 7(1), 1, 4-5.
71. Lyman, P., & Varian, H. R. (2003). How much information 2003? Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/how-much-info-2003
72. Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., & Pyke, C. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum on di-verse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 912-946.
73. Mackay, W., & Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (1998). DIVA: Exploratory data analysis with multimedia streams. In CHI 1998 Proceedings (pp. 416-423). New York: ACM Press.
74. MacWhinney, B. (n.d.-a). Child language data exchange system. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/
75. MacWhinney, (n.d.-b). TalkBank. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://talkbank.org/
76. Maher, C. (2005). How students structure their investigations and learn mathematics: Insights from a long-term study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 1-14.
77. Maher, C. (2008). Video recordings as pedagogical tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 65-83). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SensePublishers.
78. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Miller, K. F., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321-334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Mischler, E. G. (1991). Representing discourse: The rhetoric of transcription. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 255-280.
81. National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Trends in international mathematics and science study. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/
82. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html
83. National Science Foundation Task Force on Cyberlearning. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf08204
84. Nemirovsky, R., Lara-Meloy, T., Earnest, D., & Ribeiro, B. T. (2001, July). Videopapers: Investigating new multimedia genres to foster the interweaving of research and teaching. Paper presented at the 25th Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
85. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In B. Schieffelin (Ed.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
86. Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1996). The 'father knows best' dynamic in family dinner narratives. In K. Hall (Ed.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 97-121). New York: Routledge.
87. Open Archives Initiative. (2008). Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.openarchives.org/
88. Open Language Archives Community. (2008). Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.language- archives.org/
89. Palmquist, S. D., & Crowley, K. (2007). Studying dinosaur learning on an island of expertise. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 271-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. Parten, M. B. (1932). Social participation among preschool children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27, 243-269.
91. Pea, R. D. (1999). New media communication forums for improving education research and practice. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 336-370). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
92. Pea, R. D. (2006).Video-as-data and digital video manipulation techniques for transforming learning sciences re-search, education and other cultural practices. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), International hand-book of virtual learning environments (pp. 1321-1393). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
93. Pea, R. D., & Hay, K. (2003, March). Report to the National Science Foundation: CILT Workshop on Digital Video Inquiry in Learning and Education, November 25-26, 2002 (based on NSF #0124012). Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning.
94. Pea, R., & Hoffert, E. (2007). Video workflow in the learning sciences: Prospects of emerging technologies for augmenting work practices. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 427-460). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
95. Pea, R., & Lindgren, R. (2008). Video collaboratories for research and education: An analysis of col-laboration design patterns. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1(4), 235-247.
96. Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners' mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405-435.
97. Roschelle, J., Pea, R. D., & Trigg, R. (1990). VideoNoter: A tool for exploratory video analysis (Tech. Rep. No. 17). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
98. Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. L. (1973). Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology (pp. 94-107). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
99. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165-187.
100. SciVee. (2009). Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.scivee.tv/
101. Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (2002). Analyzing tools: Perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics learning [Special issue]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2/3).
102. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-27). New York: Elsevier Science.
103. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383-395). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
104. Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2007). Research on how people learn with and from video. In S. Derry (Ed.), Guidelines for conducting video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel (pp. 47-58). Chicago: Data Research and Development Center. Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://drdc.uchicago.edu/what/video-research-guidelines.pdf
105. Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence, Vol. II (pp. 37-54). London: Pitman.
106. Stern, D. (1977). The first relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107. Stevens, R. (2007). Capturing ideas in digital things: A new twist on the old problem of inert knowledge. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 547-563). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-150). New York: Cambridge University Press.
109. Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids' lives. In K. Salen (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games and learning (pp. 41-66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
110. Stevens, R., & Toro-Martell, S. (2003). Leaving a trace: Supporting museum visitor interpretation and interaction with digital media annotation systems. Journal of Museum Education, 28(2), 25-31.
111. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
112. Teachscape. (2009). Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://www.teachscape.com/
113. Tobin, J. J., & Hsueh, Y. (2007). The poetics and pleasures of video ethnography of education. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
114. Tobin, J. J., Wu, D. Y. H., & Davidson, D. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
115. Transana. (2005). Qualitative analysis software for video and audio data. Retrieved April 17, 2009, from http://www.transana.org
116. Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 3-48.
117. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). 34 CFR Part 99 family educational rights and privacy; final rule. Retrieved April 17, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html
118. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 Part 46, protection of human subjects. Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
119. Video Mosaic Collaborative. (2009). Retrieved December 15, 2009 from http://www.video-mosaic.org
120. Video Mosaic Collaborative at UW-Madison. (2009). Retrieved December 15, 2009 from VMC.wceruw.org
121. ViSA. (2009). Vidéo de Situations d'enseignement et d'Apprentissage (ViSA). Retrieved May 2, 2009, from http://visa.inrp.fr
122. Wikipedia. (2009). Petabyte. Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petabyte
123. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
124. Wortham, S. (2004). From good student to outcast: The emergence of a classroom identity. Ethos, 32(2), 164-187.
125. Zacks, R., & Tversky, D. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.
126. Znaniecki, F. (1934). The method of sociology. New York: Rinehard.