Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 31, Issue , 2016, Pages 20-31

  Noroozi, Omid ^a,b   Biemans, Harm ^b   Mulder, Martin ^b  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Biotechnology; Learning; Scripting; Writing

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; EDUCATION; TEACHING; TECHNICAL WRITING;

ARGUMENTATION; AUTHENTIC LEARNING; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS; HIGHER EDUCATION; LEARNING; PEER FEEDBACK; SCRIPTING; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84973367341     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. R. Andrews Teaching and learning argument 1995 Cassell London, NY
2. R. Andrews Argumentation in higher education Improving practice through theory and research 2010 Routledge New York, London
3. J. Andriessen Arguing to learn R.K. Sawyer, The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2006 Cambridge University Press New York 443 460
4. J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments 2003 Kluwer Dordrecht
5. N. Bacha Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 3 2010 229 241
6. M. Baker Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers, Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments 2003 Kluwer Boston 47 78
7. L. Bayerlein Students' feedback preferences: How do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 8 2014 916 931
8. D. Boud, and E. Molloy Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 6 2013 698 712
9. S. Brown Assessment for learning Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1 1 2004 81 89
10. R. Bruning, and C. Horn Developing motivation to write Educational Psychologist 35 1 2000 25 37
11. Y.D. Çevik Assessor or assessee? Investigating the differential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students' problem-solving skills Computers in Human Behavior 52 1 2015 250 265
12. Y.S. Chee Cognitive apprenticeship and its application to the teaching of smalltalk in a multimedia interactive learning environment Instructional Science 23 1-3 1995 133 161
13. Y.C. Chen, and C.C. Tsai An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 1 2009 105 117
14. K.H. Cheng, H.T. Hou, and S.Y. Wu Exploring students' emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study Interactive Learning Environments 22 3 2014 271 287
15. K. Cheng, J. Liang, and C. Tsai Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity The Internet and Higher Education 25 1 2015 78 84
16. Y.H. Cho, and K. Cho Peer reviewers learn from giving comments Instructional Science 39 5 2011 629 643
17. K. Cho, and C. MacArthur Student revision with peer and expert reviewing Learning and Instruction 20 4 2010 328 338
18. K. Cho, and C.D. Schunn Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline Computers & Education 48 3 2007 409 426
19. H. Ciftci, and Z. Kocoglu Effects of peer e-Feedback on Turkish EFL students' writing performance Journal of Educational Computing Research 46 1 2012 61 84
20. A. Collins, and J. Brown The computer as a tool for learning through reflection H. Mandl, A. Lesgold, Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems 1988 Springer Verlag New York 1 18
21. C. Cooper, R. Cherry, B. Copley, S. Fleischer, B. Pollard, and M. Sartisky Studying the writing abilities of a university freshman class: Strategies from a case study R. Beach, L. Bridwell, New directions in composition research 1984 Guilford New York 19 52
22. B.R. Crisp Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students' subsequent submission of assessable work Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 5 2007 571 581
23. W.M. Davies 'Not quite right': Helping students to make better arguments Teaching in Higher Education 13 3 2008 327 340
24. F.P.C.M. De Jong, A.E. Veldhuis-Diermanse, and G. Lutgens Computer-supported learning in university and vocational education T. Koschman, R. Hall, N. Miyake, CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation 2002 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 111 128
25. A.S. De Nisi, and A.N. Kluger Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive 14 1 2000 129 139
26. C. Gabelica, P. Van den Bossche, M. Segers, and W. Gijselaers Feedback, a powerful level in teams: A review Educational Research Review 7 2 2012 123 144
27. C. Gabelica, P. Van den Bossche, S. De Maeyer, M. Segers, and W. Gijselaers The effect of team feedback and guided reflexivity on team performance change Learning and Instruction 34 1 2014 86 96
28. M. Gielen, and B. De Wever Peer assessment in a Wiki: Product improvement, students' learning and perception regarding peer feedback Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 69 24 2012 585 594
29. M. Gielen, and B. De Wever Scripting the role of assessor and assessee in peer assessment in a wiki environment: Impact on peer feedback quality and product improvement Computers & Education 88 1 2015 370 386
30. S.J. Hanrahan, and G. Isaacs Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views Higher Education Research and Development 20 1 2001 53 69
31. J. Hattie, and H. Timperley The power of feedback Review of Educational Research 77 1 2007 81 112
32. R. Higgins, P. Hartley, and A. Skelton The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning Studies in Higher Education 27 1 2002 53 64
33. F. Hyland ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students Language Teaching Research 4 1 2000 33 54
34. K. Hyland, and F. Hyland Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback K. Hyland, F. Hyland, Feedback in second language writing 2006 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 206 224
35. A. Johns Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest Language Teaching 41 2 2008 237 252
36. J.H. Kaufman, and C.D. Schunn Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work Instructional Science 39 3 2011 387 406
37. R.T. Kellogg, and A.P. Whiteford Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice Educational Psychologist 44 4 2009 250 266
38. A. King Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing Theory Into Practice 41 1 2002 33 39
39. A.N. Kluger, and A. DeNisi The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory Psychological Bulletin 119 2 1996 254 284
40. A.N. Kluger, and A. DeNisi Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword Current Directions in Psychological Science 7 3 1998 67 72
41. I. Kollar, and F. Fischer Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective Learning and Instruction 20 4 2010 344 348
42. D. Kuhn The skills of argument 1991 Cambridge University Press
43. S. Leitão The potential of argument in knowledge building Human Development 43 6 2000 332 360
44. L. Li, X. Liu, and A.L. Steckelberg Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback British Journal of Educational Technology 41 3 2010 525 536
45. L. Li, X. Liu, and Y. Zhou Give and take: A re-analysis of assessor and assessee's roles in technology-facilitated peer assessment British Journal of Educational Technology 43 3 2012 376 384
46. S. Lin, E. Liu, and S. Yuan Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 4 2001 420 432
47. A. Lizzio, and K. Wilson Feedback on assessment: Students' perception of quality and effectiveness Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 3 2008 263 275
48. N. Michinov, and E. Michinov Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning Learning and Instruction 19 1 2009 43 54
49. M. Mostert, and J.D. Snowball Where angels fear to tread: Online peer-assessment in a large first-year class Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 6 2013 674 686
50. J. Muncie Using written feedback in EFL composition classes ELT Journal 54 1 2000 47 53
51. L. Munneke, J. Andriessen, G. Kanselaar, and P. Kirschner Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem Computers in Human Behavior 23 3 2007 1072 1088
52. M.M. Nelson, and C.D. Schunn The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance Instructional Science 37 4 2008 375 401
53. D. Nicol, A. Thomson, and C. Breslin Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 1 2014 102 122
54. O. Noroozi, H.J.A. Biemans, M.C. Busstra, M. Mulder, and M. Chizari Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health Computers in Human Behavior 27 1 2011 309 318
55. O. Noroozi, M.C. Busstra, M. Mulder, H.J.A. Biemans, H. Tobi, and M.M.E.E. Geelen M. Chizari Online discussion compensates for suboptimal timing of supportive information presentation in a digitally supported learning environment Educational Technology Research and Development 60 2 2012 193 221
56. O. Noroozi, A. Weinberger, H.J.A. Biemans, M. Mulder, and M. Chizari Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL). A systematic review and synthesis of fifteen years of research Educational Research Review 7 2 2012 79 106
57. O. Noroozi, H.J.A. Biemans, A. Weinberger, M. Mulder, and M. Chizari Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in a multidisciplinary CSCL environment Learning and Instruction 25 1 2013 1 12
58. O. Noroozi, S.D. Teasley, H.J.A. Biemans, A. Weinberger, and M. Mulder Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 8 2 2013 189 223
59. O. Noroozi, A. Weinberger, H.J.A. Biemans, M. Mulder, and M. Chizari Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL Computers & Education 61 2 2013 59 76
60. O. Noroozi, S. McAlister, and M. Mulder Impacts of a digital dialogue game and epistemic beliefs on argumentative discourse and willingness to argue The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17 3 2016 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2297
61. E.M. Nussbaum, K. Hartley, G.M. Sinatra, R.E. Reynolds, and L.D. Bendixen Personality interactions and scaffolding in on-line discussions Educational Computing Research 30 1-2 2004 113 137
62. E.M. Nussbaum, M.G. Sinatra, and A. Poliquin Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning International Journal of Science Education 30 15 2008 1977 1999
63. C. Phielix, F.J. Prins, and P.A. Kirschner Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection Computers in Human Behavior 26 2 2010 151 161
64. J. Qin, and E. Karabacak The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing System 38 3 2010 1 13
65. L. Rourke, and H. Kanuka Barriers to online critical discourse International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 1 2007 105 126
66. B. Samraj Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: Variations across disciplinary courses Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3 1 2004 5 22
67. R.C. Shih Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 27 5 2011 829 845
68. V. Shute Focus on formative feedback Review of Educational Research 78 1 2008 153 189
69. D. Sluijsmans, S. Brand-Gruwel, J.J.G. van Merriënboer, and T. Bastiaens The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education Studies in Educational Evaluation 29 1 2002 23 42
70. K. Stegmann, A. Weinberger, and F. Fischer Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 4 2007 421 447
71. K. Stegmann, C. Wecker, A. Weinberger, and F. Fischer Collaborative argumentation and cognitive processing in computer-supported collaborative learning environment Instructional Science 40 2 2012 297 323
72. I.D. Steiner Group process and productivity 1972 Academic New York
73. L.A. Stern, and A. Solomon Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled Assessing Writing 11 1 2006 22 41
74. K.J. Topping Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment Learning and Instruction 20 4 2010 339 343
75. S. Toulmin The uses of argument 1958 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
76. Y.C. Tsai, and M.T. Chuang Fostering revision of argumentative writing through structured peer assessment Perceptual & Motor Skills 116 1 2013 210 221
77. S.C. Tseng, and C.C. Tsai On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course Computers & Education 49 4 2007 1161 1174
78. M. Van Amelsvoort, J. Andriessen, and G. Kanselaar Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams The Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 4 2007 485 521
79. S. Van Ginkel, J. Gulikers, H.J.A. Biemans, and M. Mulder The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence Studies in Higher Education 2016 10.1080/03075079.2015.1117064 (in press)
80. A.L. Veerman Computer supported collaborative learning through argumentation (PhD dissertation) 2000 Utrecht University The Netherlands
81. A. Weinberger, K. Stegmann, F. Fischer, and H. Mandl Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, I. Kollar, Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge - cognitive, computational and educational perspectives 2007 Springer New York 191 211
82. U. Wingate Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11 2 2012 26 37
83. N.V. Wood Perspectives on argument 2001 Prentice Hall New Jersey
84. S.M. Wu Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance: Investigating the strategy of problematization in students' argumentation RELC Journal 37 3 2006 329 353
85. Y. Xiao, and R. Lucking The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment The Internet and Higher Education 11 3-4 2008 186 193
86. Y.F. Yang Students' reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing Computers & Education 55 3 2010 1202 1210
87. Y.F. Yang A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing British Journal of Educational Technology 42 4 2011 687 700