An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 105-117

  Chen, Ying Chih ^a   Tsai, Chin Chung ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Attitude; In service teachers; Internet; Online; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849132477     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: 14703300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290802646297     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346-354.
2. Davies, P. (2006). Peer assessment: Judging the quality of students' work by comments rather than marks. Innovations on Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 69-82.
3. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(2), 175-187.
4. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in high education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
5. Liu, C.-C., & Tsai, C-M. (2005). Peer assessment through web-based knowledge acquisition: Tools to support conceptual awareness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 43-59.
6. Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., & Yuan, S.M. (2001). Design of a networked portfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 492-494.
7. Magin, D. (2001). Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 53-63.
8. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-250.
9. Prins, F.J., Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Kirschner, P.A., & Strijbos, J.W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444.
10. Topping, K.J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
11. Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (in press). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science.
12. Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
13. van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 341-356.
14. Wen, L.M.C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51, 27-44.
15. Wen, L.M.C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an in-service science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 55-67.