The effect of team feedback and guided reflexivity on team performance change

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 34, Issue , 2014, Pages 86-96

  Gabelica, Catherine ^a   Van den Bossche, P ^a,b   De Maeyer, S ^b   Segers, M ^a   Gijselaers, Wim ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Feedback; Team learning; Team performance; Team reflexivity; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907174036     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anseel F., Lievens F., Schollaert E. Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2009, 110:23-35. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003.
2. Argote L. To centralize or not to centralize: the effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1989, 43:58-74. 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90058-7.
3. Barr S.H., Conlon E.J. Effects of distribution of feedback in work groups. Academy of Management Journal 1994, 37:641-655. 10.2307/256703.
4. Bartram D., Roe R.A. Individual and organizational factors in competence acquisition. The learning potential of the workplace 2008, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. W. Nijhof (Ed.).
5. Blickensderfer E.L., Cannon-Bowers J.A., Salas E. Theoretical bases for team self-corrections: fostering shared mental models. Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams 1997, Vol. 4:249-279. JAI, Greenwich, CT.
6. Boud D., Keogh R., Walker D. Promoting reflection in learning: a model. Reflection: Turning experience into learning 1985, 18-40. Kogan Page, London. D. Boud, R. Keogh, D. Walker (Eds.).
7. Boud D., Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2013, 38(6):698-712. 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
8. Brannick M.T., Prince C., Salas E. Can PC-based systems enhance teamwork in the cockpit?. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 2005, 15(2):173-187. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1502_4.
9. De Dreu C.K.W. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92:628-638. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.628.
10. Daudelin M.W. Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics 1996, 24:36-48. 10.1016/S0090-2616(96)90004-2.
11. Decuyper S., Dochy F., Van den Bossche P. Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: an integrative model for effective team learning in organizations. Educational Research Review 2010, 5:111-133. 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002.
12. Devine D.J. A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2002, 6:291-310. 10.1037/1089-2699.6.4.291.
13. Dillenbourg P. Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL 2002, 61-91. Heerlen, Open Universiteit Nederland. P.A. Kirschner (Ed.).
14. Duijnhouwer H., Prins F.J., Stokking K.M. Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: effects on students' writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction 2012, 22(1):171-184. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.003.
15. Duncan T.E., Duncan S.C., Strycker L.A. An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling 2006, LEA, Mahwah, NJ.
16. Edmondson A.C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999, 44:350-383. 10.2307/2666999.
17. Edmondson A.C., Dillon J., Roloff K.S. Three perspectives on team learning outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. The Academy of Management Annals 2007, 1:269-314. 10.1080/078559811.
18. Espinosa J.A., Slaughter S.A., Kraut R.E., Herbsleb J.D. Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development. Journal of Management Information Systems 2007, 24(1):5-12.
19. Gabelica C., Van den Bossche P., Segers M., Gijselaers W. Feedback, a powerful level in teams: a review. Educational Research Review 2012, 7(2):123-144.
20. Gabelica C., Van den Bossche P., Segers M., Gijselaers W. Dynamics of team reflexivity after feedback. Frontline Learning Research 2014, 2(2):64-91.
21. Gersick C.J.G., Hackman J.R. Habitual routines in task-performing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1990, 47:65-97. 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-D.
22. Gibbs G., Simpson C. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 2004, 1:3-31.
23. van Ginkel W.P., van Knippenberg D. Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: when and why does it work?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2009, 108(2):218-229. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.003.
24. Gurtner A., Tschan F., Semmer N.K., Nagele C. Getting groups to develop good strategies: effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2007, 102:127-142. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.002.
25. Hackman J.R., Wageman R. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review 2005, 30:269-287. 10.5465/AMR.2005.16387885.
26. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(1):81-112. 10.3102/003465430298487.
27. Hoegl M., Parboteeah K.P. Team goal commitment in innovative projects. International Journal of Innovation Management 2006, 10(3):299-324. 10.1142/S136391960600151X.
28. Janssen J., Kirschner F., Erkens G., Kirschner P.A., Paas F. Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review 2010, 22:139-154. 10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x.
29. Jermann P., Dillenbourg P. Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL scenario. Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments 2003, Kluwer, Amsterdam, NL. J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.).
30. Karau S.J., Kelly J.R. The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1992, 28:542-571. 10.1016/0022-1031(92)90045-L.
31. Kirschner P.A. Epistemology or pedagogy, that is the question. Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure? 2009, 144-157. Routledge, New York. S. Tobias, T.M. Duffy (Eds.).
32. Kirschner F., Paas F., Kirschner P.A. Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior 2009, 25:306-314. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008.
33. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:254-284. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
34. Kozlowski S.W.J., Ilgen D.R. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2006, 7:77-124. 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x.
35. Lewis K., Belliveau M., Herndon B., Keller J. Group cognition, membership change, and performance: investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2007, 103(2):159-178. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005.
36. Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science 2005, 16(6):581-598. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0143.
37. London M. Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
38. London M., Sessa V.I. Group feedback for continuous learning. Human Resource Development Review 2006, 5(3):1-27. 10.1177/1534484306290226.
39. MacCurtain S., Flood P.C., Ramamoorthy N., West M.A., Dawson J. Top management team knowledge sharing and new product performance: a study of Irish Software Industry. Creativity and Innovation Management 2010, 19(3):219-232. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00564.x.
40. Mann K., Gordon J., MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2009, 14(4):595-621. 10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.
41. Marks M.A. A critical analysis of computer simulations for conducting team research. Small Group Research 2000, 31(6):653-675. 10.1177/104649640003100602.
42. Moreland R.L., McMinn J.G. Group reflexivity and performance. Advances in group processes 2010, Vol. 27:63-95. Emerald Press, Bingley, UK.
43. Mulder R.H. Exploring feedback incidents, their characteristics and the informal learning activities that emanate from them. European Journal of Training and Development 2013, 37(1):49-71.
44. Nihalani P.K., Mayrath M., Robinson D.H. When feedback harms and collaboration helps in computer simulation environments: an expertise reversal effect. Journal of Educational Psychology 2011, 103(4):776-785.
45. Noroozi O., Biemans H.J.A., Weinberger A., Mulder M., Chizari M. Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in a multidisciplinary CSCL environment. Learning and Instruction 2013, 25(1):1-12. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.002.
46. Phielix C., Prins F.J., Kirschner P.A. Awareness of group performance in a CSCL environment: effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior 2010, 26:151-161. 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.011.
47. Phielix C., Prins F.J., Kirschner P.A., Erkens G., Jaspers J.G.M. Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior 2011, 27(3):1087-1102. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024.
48. Pinheiro J.C., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS 2000, Springer.
49. Porter C.O.L.H., Webb J.W., Gogus C.I. When goal orientations collide: effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2010, 95(5):935-943. 10.1037/a0019637.
50. Prawat R.S. Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: a research synthesis. Review of Educational Research 1989, 59:1-41. 10.3102/00346543059001001.
51. Prichard J.S., Stratford R.J., Bizo L.A. Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction 2006, 16:256-265. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.005.
52. Prins F.J., Sluijsmans D.M.A., Kirschner P.A. Feedback for general practitioners in training: quality, styles, and preferences. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2006, 11:289-303. 10.1007/s10459-005-3250-z.
53. Prussia G.E., Kinicki A.J. A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996, 81:187-198. 10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.187.
54. Rogelberg S.G., Rumery S. Gender diversity, team decision quality, time-on-task, and interpersonal cohesion. Small Group Research 1996, 27:79-90. 10.1177/1046496496271004.
55. Salas E., Dickinson T.L., Converse S.A., Tannenbaum S.I. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. Teams: Their training and performance 1992, 3-29. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. R.W. Swezey, E. Salas (Eds.).
56. Schippers M.C., Den Hartog D.N., Koopman P.L. Reflexivity in teams: a measure and correlates. Applied Psychology - An International Review 2007, 56(2):189-211. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x.
57. Schippers M.C., Homan A.C., van Knippenberg D. To reflect or not to reflect: prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2013, 34(1):6-23. 10.1002/job.1784.
58. Seibert K.W. Reflection-in-action: tools for cultivating on-the-job learning conditions. Organizational Dynamics 1999, 27:54-65. 10.1016/S0090-2616(99)90021-9.
59. Shute V.J. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 2008, 78:153-189. 10.3102/0034654307313795.
60. Singer J.D., Willett J.B. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Methods for studying change and event occurrence 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
61. Smith-Jentsch K.A., Cannon-Bowers J.A., Tannenbaum S.I., Salas E. Guided team self-correction: impacts on team mental models, behavior, and effectiveness. Small Group Research 2008, 39(3):303-327. 10.1177/1046496408317794.
62. Spinath B., Spinath F.M. Longitudinal analysis of the link between learning motivation and competence beliefs among elementary school children. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:87-102. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.008.
63. Staats B.R., Gino F., Pisano G.P. Varied experience, team familiarity, and learning: The mediating role of psychological safety 2010, Working paper 10-016, Harvard Business School.
64. Tannenbaum S.I., Cerasoli C.P. Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2013, 55(1):231-245. 10.1177/0018720812448394.
65. Tolmie A.K., Topping K.J., Christie D., Donaldson C., Howe C., Jessiman E., et al. Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20(3):177-191. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005.
66. Veenman M.V.J., Elshout J.J. Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education 1999, 14:509-523.
67. Villado A.J., Arthur W. The comparative effect of subjective and objective after-action reviews on team performance on a complex task. Journal of Applied Psychology 2013, 98(3):514-528. 10.1037/a0031510.
68. Weingart L.R. Impact of group goals, task component, complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1992, 77(5):682-693. 10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.682.
69. West M.A., Garrod S., Carletta J. Group decision-making and effectiveness: unexplored boundaries. Creating tomorrow's organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior 1997, 293-316. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. C.L. Cooper, S.E. Jackson (Eds.).
70. Wills K.V., Clerkin T.A. Incorporating reflective practice into team simulation projects for improved learning outcomes. Business Communication Quarterly 2009, 72(2):221227. 10.1177/1080569909334559.
71. Wilson J.M., Goodman P.S., Cronin M. Group learning. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32:1041-1059. 10.5465/AMR.2007.26585724.
72. Yukawa J. Co-reflection in online learning: collaborative critical thinking as narrative. Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2006, 1:203-228. 10.1007/s11412-006-8994-9.