Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 151-161

  Phielix, Chris ^a   Prins, Frans J ^a   Kirschner, Paul A ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Group performance; Groupware; Peer feedback; Reflection

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; GROUP BEHAVIOR; GROUP MEMBERS; GROUP PERFORMANCE; PEER FEEDBACK; POSITIVE ATTITUDE; PROBLEM-BASED; TEAM DEVELOPMENT;

CESIUM ALLOYS; COMPUTER CRIME; FLUORINE CONTAINING POLYMERS; GROUP TECHNOLOGY; GROUPWARE; INTEROPERABILITY; RADAR; REFLECTION;

RADAR REFLECTION;

EID: 71749119730     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bales R.F. A new overview of the SYMLOG system: Measuring and changing behavior in groups. In: Polly R.B., Hare A.P., and Stone P.J. (Eds). The SYMLOG practitioner: Applications of small group research (1988), Preager, New York 319-344
2. Bales R.F., and Cohen S.P. SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups (1979), Macmillan Publishing, New York
3. Baltes B.B., Dickson M.W., Sherman M.P., Bauer C.C., and LaGanke J. Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87 1 (2002) 156-179
4. Benbunan-Fich R., Hiltz S.R., and Turoff M. A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems 34 (2003) 457-469
5. Boud D., Cohen R., and Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (1999) 413-426
6. Boud D., Keogh R., and Walker D. Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In: Boud D., Keogh R., and Walker D. (Eds). Reflection: Turning experience into learning (1985), Routledge Falmer, London 18-40
7. Brok P.d., Brekelmans M., and Wubbels Th. Multilevel issues in studies using students' perceptions of learning environments: The case of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research 9 (2006) 199-213
8. Castleton_Partners/TCO. Building trust in diverse teams (2007), Castleton Partners/TSO International Diversity Management, London/Cambridge, UK
9. Dominick P.G., Reilly R.R., and McGourty J.W. The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior. Group & Organization Management 22 (1997) 508-525
10. Dourish P., and Bellotti V. Awareness and coordination in a shared workspace. In: Mantel M., and Baecker R. (Eds). Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (1992), ACM Press, New York 107-114
11. Druskat V.U., and Wolff S.B. Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (1999) 58-74
12. Emans B., Koopman P., Rutte C., and Steensma H. Teams in organisaties: Interne en externe determinanten van resultaatgerichtheid [Teams in organizations: Internal and external determinants of outcome orientation]. Gedrag en Organisatie 9 (1996) 309-327
13. Fischer F., Bruhn J., Gräsel C., and Mandl H. Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12 (2002) 213-232
14. Fjermestad J. An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decision Support Systems 37 (2004) 239-263
15. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Archer W. Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to access cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education 15 1 (2001) 7-23
16. Garton L., and Wellman B. Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. In: Burleseon B.R. (Ed). Communication yearbook Vol. 18 (1995), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 438-453
17. Geister S., Konradt U., and Hertel G. Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research 37 (2006) 459-489
18. Gersick C. Time and transition in work teams: Towards a new model of group development. The Academy of Management Journal 31 (1988) 9-41
19. Gunawardena C.N. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 2&3 (1995) 147-166
20. Hertz-Lazarowitz R., and Bar-Natan I. Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC). Computers & Education 39 1 (2002) 19-36
21. Hobman E.V., Bordia P., Irmer B., and Chang A. The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research 33 (2002) 439-465
22. Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5. Retrieved March 6, 2009. Available from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/jacobson.html.
23. Janssen J., Erkens G., Kanselaar G., and Jaspers J. Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education 49 (2007) 1037-1065
24. Jarvenpaa S., and Leidner D. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science 10 (1999) 791-815
25. Jaspers J., Broeken M., and Erkens G. Virtual Collaborative Research Institute (VCRI) (Version 2.0) (2004), Onderwijskunde Utrecht, ICO/ISOR, Utrecht
26. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. 5th ed. (1999), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA
27. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T., and Smith K. The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review 19 (2007) 15-29
28. Johnson S.D., Suriya C., Yoon S.W., Berret J.V., and La Fleur J. Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers & Education 39 (2002) 379-393
29. Jonassen D.H. Context is everything. Educational Technology 31 6 (1991) 35-37
30. Jonassen D.H. Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology 34 4 (1994) 34-37
31. Karau S., and Williams K. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 681-706
32. Kenny D.A. Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis (1994), Guilford, New York
33. Kirschner P.A., Strijbos J., Kreijns K., and Beers P.J. Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 52 3 (2004) 47-66
34. Kittler J.E., Menard W., and Phillips K.A. Weight concerns in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder. Eating Behaviors 8 (2007) 115-120
35. Kluger A.N., and DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119 (1996) 254-284
36. Kreijns K., and Kirschner P.A. Determining sociability, social space and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborating teams. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 7 (2004) 155-172
37. Kreijns K., Kirschner P.A., and Jochems W. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003) 335-353
38. Liaw S., and Huang H. Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature. Educational Technology 40 3 (2000) 41-45
39. Lipponen L., Rahikainen M., Lallimo J., and Hakkarainen K. Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 487-509
40. Locke E.A., and Latham G.P. Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science 4 (1990) 240-246
41. McLeod P.L., and Liker J.K. Process feedback in task groups: An application of goal setting. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 28 (1992) 15-52
42. Mento A.J., Steel R.P., and Karren R.J. A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39 (1987) 52-83
43. Neubert M.J. The value of feedback and goal setting over goal setting alone and potential moderators of this effect: A meta-analysis. Human Performance 11 (1998) 321-335
44. Northrup P.T. A framework for designing interactivity into web-based instruction. Educational Technology 41 2 (2001) 31-39
45. O'Donnell A.M., and O'Kelly J. Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review 6 (1994) 321-349
46. Prins F.J., Sluijsmans D.M.A., and Kirschner P.A. Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles, and preferences. Advances in Health Sciences Education 11 (2006) 289-303
47. Rochelle J., and Teasley S. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O'Malley C. (Ed). Computer-supported collaborative learning (1995), Springer-Verlag, New York 69-97
48. Salas E., Sims D.E., and Burke C.S. Is there a "Big Five" in teamwork?. Small Group Research 36 (2005) 555-599
49. Salomon G., and Globerson T. When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research 13 1 (1989) 89-99
50. Schön D.A. Educating the reflective practitioner (1987), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
51. Short J., Williams E., and Christie B. The social psychology of telecommunications (1976), John Wiley & Sons, London
52. Straus S.G. Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction 12 (1997) 227-266
53. Straus S.G., and McGrath J.E. Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 1 (1994) 87-97
54. Strijbos J.W., Martens R.L., Jochems W.M.G., and Broers N.J. The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning: A matter of triangulation. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 353-380
55. Stroebe W., Diehl M., and Abakoumkin G. The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (1992) 643-650
56. Thompson L.F., and Coovert M.D. Teamwork online: The effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction and postdiscussion accuracy. Group Dynamics 7 (2003) 135-151
57. Tubbs M.E. Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (1986) 474-483
58. Tuckman B.W., and Jensen M.A.C. Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies 2 (1977) 419-427
59. Walther J.B., Anderson J.F., and Park D. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research 19 (1994) 460-487
60. Williams K.D., Harkins S.G., and Latané B. Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 (1981) 303-311
61. Wubbels, T., Créton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers, interactional teacher behavior mapped out. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
62. Yukawa J. Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning 1 (2006) 203-228