The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 186-193

  Xiao, Yun ^a   Lucking, Robert ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer assessment; Peer feedback; Wikibook

Indexed keywords

RELIABILITY;

ADDED VALUES; COMPARISON GROUPS; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; INTERACTIVE SOFTWARES; ONLINE COLLABORATIVE; PEER ASSESSMENT; PEER ASSESSMENTS; PEER FEEDBACK; TWO TYPES; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS; WIKIBOOK; WRITING PERFORMANCES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 56049087959     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Berg I.V.D., Admiraal W., and Pilot A. Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 31 1 (2006) 19-36
2. Birkeland, T.S. (1986). Variations of feedback related to teaching paragraph structure to technicians. Retrieved January 7, 2008, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb? index=0&did=752276871&SrchMode=1$sid=3&Fmt=2
3. Black P., and Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5 1 (1998) 7-74
4. Boud D., Cohen R., and Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 4 (1999) 413-426
5. Chaudron, C. (1983). Evaluating writing: Effects of feedback on revision. Paper presented at the 17th Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
6. Cheng W., and Warren M. Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 3 (1999) 301-314
7. Cho K., Schunn C.D., and Wilson W. Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology 98 4 (2006) 891-901
8. Davies P. Peer assessment: Judging the quality of students' work by comments rather than marks. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 1 (2006) 69-82
9. Fagot R. Reliability of ratings for multiple judges: Intraclass correlation and metric sales. Applied Psychological Measurement 15 1 (1991) 1-11
10. Falchikov N. Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative self and peer group assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 11 2 (1986) 146-166
11. Falchikov N. Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International 32 2 (1995) 175-187
12. Ferguson G.A. Statistical analysis in psychology and education. (2nd ed.) (1966), McGraw Hill, New York
13. Guilford W.H. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Innovations and Ideas 25 3 (2001) 167-175
14. Haaga D.A.F. Peer review of term papers in graduate psychology course. Teaching of Psychology 20 1 (1993) 28-32
15. Li, L., & Steckelberg, A. (2004). Using peer feedback to enhance student meaningful learning. Chicago, IL: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED48511).
16. Lin S.S.J., Liu E.Z.F., and Yuan S.M. Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 (2001) 420-432
17. Liu E.Z., Lin S.S., Chiu C.H., and Yuan S.M. Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education 44 3 (2001) 246-251
18. Lu, R.L. (2005). A comparison of anonymous e-peer review versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and learning satisfaction. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=0&did=920928121&SrchMode =1&sid=1&Fmt=6&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1206972687&clientId=3505
19. Lu R.L., and Bol L. A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6 2 (2007) 100-115
20. MacLeod L. Computer-aided peer review of writing. Business Communication Quarterly 62 3 (1999) 87
21. Magin D. Should student peer ratings be used as part of summative assessment?. Higher Education Research and Development 16 (1993) 537-542
22. Marcoulides G.A., and Simkin M.G. The consistency of peer review in student writing projects. Journal of Education for Business 70 (1995) 220-223
23. McIsasc C.M., and Sepe J.F. Improving the writing of accounting students: A cooperative venture. Journal of Accounting Education 14 4 (1996) 515-533
24. Mowl G., and Pain R. Using self and peer assessment to improve students' essay writing: A case study from geography. Innovations in Education and Training International 32 4 (1995) 324-335
25. O'Shea P.M., Baker P.B., Allen D.W., Curry-Corcoran D.E., and Allen D.B. New levels of student participatory learning: A WikiText for the introductory course in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6 3 (2007) 228-235
26. Paulus T.M. The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 8 3 (1999) 265-289
27. Plutsky S., and Wilson B.A. Comparison of the three methods for teaching and evaluating writing: A quasi-experimental study. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 46 1 (2004) 50-61
28. Richer D.L. The effects of two feedback systems on first year college students' writing proficiency. Dissertation Abstracts International 53 (1992) 2722
29. Robinson, J.M. (1999). Anonymous peer review for classroom use: Results of a pilot project in a large science unit. Teaching and Learning Forum 99.
30. Saito H., and Fujita T. Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research 8 1 (2004) 31-54
31. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86 (1979) 420-428
32. Smith D., Campbell J., and Brooker R. The impact of students' approaches to essay writing on the quality of their essays. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 3 (1999) 327-338
33. Sluijsmans D., Brand-Gruwel S., and Van Merriënboer J.J.G. Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment and Education in Higher Education 27 5 (2002) 443-454
34. Stefani L.A.J. Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education 19 1 (1994) 69-75
35. Stefani L.A.J. Assessment in partnership with learners. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 23 4 (1998) 339-350
36. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68 (1998) 249-276
37. Topping K., Smith F.F., Swanson I., and Elliot A. Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25 2 (2000) 149-169
38. Venables A., and Summit R. Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 40 3 (2003) 281-290
39. "Wikibooks." (2008). Encyclopedia. Retrieved January 21, 2008 from http://www.reference.com/search?q=Wikibook
40. Zhao Y. The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication 4 4 (1998) 311-345