A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 687-700

  Yang, Yu Fen ^a  

^a NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE STUDENTS; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FACE-TO-FACE INSTRUCTION; PEER REVIEW; PEER REVIEW SYSTEM; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; WRITING PROCESS;

SCAFFOLDS; USER INTERFACES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79958211816     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Baird, C., (2004). Transforming knowledge through mentor-supported cognitive apprenticeship learning methods. Retrieved April, 17, 2009, from
2. Braine, G., (1997). Beyond word processing: networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computers and Composition, 14, 1, 45-58. (Pubitemid 127343410)
3. Chee, Y. S., (1995). Cognitive apprenticeship and its application to the teaching of Smalltalk in a multimedia interactive learning environment. Instructional Science, 23, 133-161.
4. Cheng, Y. C., &, Ku, H. Y., (2009). An investigation of the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1, 40-49.
5. Cho, K., &, Schunn, C. D., (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: a web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48, 409-426. (Pubitemid 44802952)
6. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., &, Newman, S. E., (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In, L. B. Resnick, (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Duran, D., &, Monereo, C., (2005). Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 15, 3, 179-199. (Pubitemid 40746547)
8. Ferris, D. R., (2003). Response to student writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Hansen, J. G., &, Liu, J., (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59, 1, 31-38. (Pubitemid 41240406)
10. Jarvela, S., (1995). The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: interpreting the learning interaction. Learning and Instruction, 5, 231-259.
11. Kay, R. H., (2007). Learning performance and computer software: an exploration of knowledge transfer. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1, 333-352. (Pubitemid 44278497)
12. Li, J., (2006). The mediation of technology in ESL writing and its implications for writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 11, 5-21. (Pubitemid 43591796)
13. Liou, H. C., &, Peng, Z. Y., (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37, 514-525.
14. Liu, T. C., (2005). Web-based cognitive apprenticeship model for improving pre-service teachers' performances and attitudes towards instructional planning: design and field experiment. Educational Technology & Society, 8, 2, 136-149.
15. Lundstrom, K., &, Baker, W., (2009). To give is better than to receive: the benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.
16. Min, H. T., (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141.
17. Patel, A., Kinshuk, &, Russell, D., (2003). Cognitive apprenticeship learning-ensuring far transfer of knowledge through computer-based assessment. In, S. Naidu, (Ed.), Learning & Teaching with Technology-Principles and Practices (pp. 233-246). London: Kogan Page.
18. Patton, M. Q., (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd Ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Paulus, T. M., (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 3, 265-289.
20. Storch, N., (2005). Collaborative writing: product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
21. van Leeuwen, R., Tiesinga, L. J., Jochemsen, H., &, Post, D., (2009). Learning effects of thematic peer-review: a qualitative analysis of reflective journals on spiritual care. Nurse Education Today, 29, 4, 413-422.
22. Vass, E., Littleton, K., Miell, D., &, Jones, A., (2008). The discourse of collaborative creative writing: peer collaboration as a context for mutual inspiration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 192-202.
23. Wang, F. K., &, Bonk, C. J., (2001). A design framework for electronic cognitive apprenticeship. JALN, 5, 2, 131-151. (Pubitemid 38818712)
24. Weber, R. P., (1990). Basic Content Analysis (2nd Ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Williams, S. M., (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 4, 367-427.
26. Woolley, N. N., &, Jarvis, Y., (2007). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: a model for teaching and learning clinical skills in a technologically rich and authentic learning environment. Nurse Education Today, 27, 73-79. (Pubitemid 44849244)
27. Xiao, Y., &, Lucking, R., (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 186-193.
28. Yoshimura, F., (2009). Effects of connecting reading and writing and a checklist to guide the reading process on EFL learners' learning about English writing. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1871-1883.