Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 698-712

  Boud, David ^a   Molloy, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

curriculum design; feedback; impact on learning; sustainable assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879665126     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adcroft, A. 2011. The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research and Development, 30 (4): 405 - 419.
2. Askew, S. and Lodge, C. 2000. " Gifts, ping-pong and loops - linking feedback and learning ". In Feedback for learning, Edited by: Askew, S. 1 - 17. London: Routledge.
3. Barnett, R. and Coate, K. 2005. Engaging the curriculum in higher education, Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
4. Bloxham, S. and Campbell, L. 2010. Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (3): 291 - 300.
5. Boud, D. 2000. Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education., 22 (2): 151 - 167.
6. Boud, D. 2009. " How can practice reshape assessment? ". In Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education, Edited by: Joughin, G. 29 - 44. Dordrecht: Springer.
7. Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. 2007. " Developing assessment for informing judgement ". In Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term, Edited by: Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. 181 - 197. London: Routledge.
8. Bunch, B. and Hellemans, A. 2004. The history of science and technology, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Butler, D.L. and Winne, P.H. 1995. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research., 65 (3): 245 - 281.
10. Carless, D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2): 219 - 233.
11. Carless, D. 2009. Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (1): 79 - 89.
12. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M. and Lam, J. 2011. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (5): 395 - 407.
13. Grundy, S. 1987. Curriculum - product or praxis?, London: The Falmer Press.
14. Hattie, J. 2009. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, London: Routledge.
15. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77: 81 - 112.
16. Heywood, J. 2000. Assessment in higher education, London: Jessica Kingsley.
17. Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2011. The national student survey: Findings and trends 2006-2010, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
18. Hounsell, D. 2007. " Towards more sustainable feedback to students ". In Rethinking assessment in higher education, Edited by: Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. 101 - 113. London: Routledge.
19. Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J. and Litjens, J. 2008. The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27 (1): 55 - 67.
20. Hughes, C. 2004. The supervisor's influence on workplace learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 26 (2): 275 - 287.
21. Ilgen, D., and A. Davis. Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International, Review, 49: 550-565.
22. JISC. 2010. Effective assessment in a digital age, Bristol: JISC. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/digiassess
23. Kift, S., Nelson, K. and Clarke, J. 2010. Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE - a case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1 (1): 1 - 20.
24. Krause, K., R. Hartley, R. James, and C. McInnis. (2009). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/experience/docs/FYE_Report_1994_to_2009.pdf
25. Molloy, E. 2010. The feedforward mechanism: A way forward in clinical learning?. Medical Education, 44: 1157 - 1159.
26. Nicol, D. 2009. Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (3): 335 - 352.
27. Nicol, D. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2): 199 - 218.
28. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J. and O'Donovan, B. 2010. Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (3): 277 - 289.
29. Price, M., O'Donovan, B. and Rust, C. 2007. Putting a social-constructivist assessment process model into practice: Building the feedback loop into the assessment process through peer review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44 (2): 143 - 152.
30. Ramaprasad, A. 1983. On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28: 4 - 13.
31. Rowntree, D. 1977. Assessing students: How shall we know them?, London: Harper & Row.
32. Rust, C., O'Donovan, B. and Price, M. 2005. A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (3): 231 - 240.
33. Sadler, D.R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18 (2): 119 - 144.
34. Shute, V.J. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1): 153 - 189.
35. Wiener, N. 1950. The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society, Boston, MA: Houghton.