Exploring students' emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 271-287

  Cheng, Kun Hung ^a,b   Hou, Huei Tse ^b   Wu, Sheng Yi ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

behavioural pattern; emotional response; learning process; peer assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900530813     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2011.649766     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abe, J.A., & Izard, C.E. (1999). The developmental functions of emotions: An analysis in terms of differential emotions theory. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 523-549. doi: 10.1080/026999399379177
2. Bradley, M.M. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
3. Davis, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37, 346-355. doi: 10.1080/135580000750052955
4. Derks, D., Fischer, A.H., & Bos, A.E.R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 766-785. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
5. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-187. doi: 10.1080/1355800950320212
6. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. London: Routledge-Falmer.
7. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. doi: 10.3102/00346543070003287
8. Fischer, A.H., Manstead, A.S.R., & Zaalberg, R. (2003). Social influences on the emotion process. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 171-201. doi: 10.1080/10463280340000054
9. Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 289-299. doi: 10.1080/0260293950200305
10. Frijda, N.H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama, & H.R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture, (pp. 51-89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Hazlett, R.L., & Benedek, J. (2007). Measuring emotional valence to understand the user's experience of software. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 65, 306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.005
12. Hou, H.T. (2010). Exploring the behavioural patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: Quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 52-60.
13. Hou, H.T., Chang, K.E., & Sung, Y.T. (2007). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 237-251. doi: 10.1080/10494820701206974
14. Hou, H.T., Chang, K.E., & Sung, Y.T. (2008). Analysis of problem-solving based online asynchronous discussion pattern. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 17-28.
15. Hou, H.T., Chang, K.E., & Sung, Y.T. (2009). Using blogs as a professional development tool for teachers: Analysis of interaction behavioral patterns. Interactive Learning Environments, 17, 325-340. doi: 10.1080/10494820903195215
16. Izard, C.E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
17. Jeong, A.C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25-43. doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_3
18. Kaufman, J.H., & Schunn, C.D. (2011). Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39, 387-406. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
19. Lang, P.J. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Fear and anxiety. In A.H. Tuma, & J.D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorder (pp. 131-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Levenson, R.W. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ekman, & R.J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 123-126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21. Levine, R.E., Kelly, P.A., Karakoc, T., & Haidet, P. (2007). Peer evaluation in a clinical clerkship: Students' attitudes, experiences, and correlations with traditional assessments. Academic Psychiatry, 31(1), 19-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.1.19
22. Lin, S.S.J., Liu, E.Z.F., & Yuan, S.M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420-432. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
23. Liu, C.C., & Tsai, C.M. (2005). Peer assessment through web-based knowledge acquisition: Tools to support conceptual awareness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 43-59. doi: 10.1080/14703290500048838
24. McGourty, J. (2000). Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 120-124. doi: 10.1109/13.848062
25. Morris, J.D. (1995). Observations: SAM: The self-assessment manikin - An efficient cross-cultural measurement of emotional response. Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 63-68.
26. Murray, I.R., & Arnott, J.L. (1993). Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 1097-1108. doi: 10.1121/1.405558
27. Prins, F., Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Kirschner, P., & Strijbos, J.W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 417-444. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099219
28. Ravaja, N., Turpeinen, M., Saari, T., Puttonen, S., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2008). The psychophysiology of James Bond: Phasic emotional responses to violent video game events. Emotion, 8(1), 114-120. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.114
29. Russell, J.A., & Mehrabian, A. (1977). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 273-294. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X
30. Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 275-288. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x
31. Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 71-81. doi: 10.1080/13558000110102904
32. Strachan, I.B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self assessment of group work: Developing an effective response to increased enrollment in a third year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20, 343-353. doi: 10.1080/03098269608709377
33. Topping, K.J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276. doi: 10.3102/00346543068003249
34. Topping, K.J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631-645. doi: 10.1080/01443410500345172
35. Tsai, C.C., & Liang, J.C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37, 293-310. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0
36. Tsai, C.C., Lin, S.S.J., & Yuan, S.M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241-252. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0
37. Tseng, S.C., & Tsai, C.C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49, 1161-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
38. Värlander, S. (2008). The role of students' emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 145-156. doi: 10.1080/13562510801923195
39. van Gennip, N.A.E., Segers, M.S.R., & Tillema, H.H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
40. Weiss, R.P. (2000). Emotion and learning. Training & Development, 54, 45-48.
41. Wen, M.L., & Tsai, C.C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51, 27-44. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
42. Wiley, J., & Schooler, W.J. (2001). The mental web: Pedagogical and cognitive implications of the net. In C.R. Wolfe (Ed.), Learning and teaching in the World Wide Web (pp 243-257). New York, NY: Academic Press.
43. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477-501. doi: 10.1023/A:1023967026413
44. Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34, 451-480. doi: 10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0