Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students' writing performance

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 61-84

  Ciftci, Hatime ^a   Kocoglu, Zeynep ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861065039     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: 15414140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.46.1.c     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arslan, R. S., & Sahin-Kizil, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183-197.
2. Bloch, J. (2007). Abdullah's blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning and Technology, 11(2), 128-141. Retrieved from http://llt.msu. edu/vol11num2/bloch/default.html
3. Braine, G. (2001). A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes. Computers and Composition, 18, 275-292.
4. Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21(1), 18-36.
5. Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: Promoting metaglinguistic awareness through computer-supported collaborative learning. Language Awareness, 16(1), 57-74.
6. Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2005). Exploring the blogosphere: Use of web logs in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 410-421.
7. Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28.
8. Ertmer, P. A, Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., & Coulthard, G. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/ ertmer.html
9. Fotos, S., & Browne, C. (2004). The development of CALL and current options. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research, 36(1), 143-162.
11. Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students' experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24, 443-461.
12. Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 206-213.
13. Hansen, J. G. (2005). Cooperative learning methods and the teaching of English writing: Peer response. STETS Language & Communication Review, 4(1), 9-14.
14. Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2004). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31-38.
15. Ho, M., & Savignon, S. J. (2007). Face-to-face and computer mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 269-290.
16. Hourigan, T., & Murray, L. (2010). Using blogs to help language students to develop reflective learning strategies: Towards a pedagogical framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 209-225.
17. Hsu, H. Y., Wang, S. K., & Comac, L. (2008). Using audioblogs to assist English language learning: An investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 181-198.
18. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101.
20. Jones, R. H., Garralda, A. L., Li, D. C., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in online and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 1-23.
21. Jones, S. J. (2006). Blogging and ESL writing: A case study of how students responded to the use of weblogs as a pedagogical tool for the writing process approach in a community college ESL writing class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.
22. Karpati, A. (2009). Web 2 technologies for net native language learners: A "social CALL. ReCALL, 21(2), 139-156.
23. Kizil, A. S. (2007). A quasi-experimental study on the effect of weblog integrated process approach on EFL students' writing performance, autonomous learning, and perceptions. Unpublished Master thesis. Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
24. Lenhart, A., & Fox, S. (2006). Bloggers: A portrait of the internet's new storytellers. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
25. Leverett, T. (2006). This is your class on blogs. Teaching English with Technology, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.iatefl.org.pl/call/j-tech25.htm#cla
26. Lin, H., & Chien, P. (2009). An investigation into effectiveness of peer feedback. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages Fortune Institute of Technology, 3, 79-87.
27. Liou, H., & Peng, Z. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37, 514-525.
28. Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193-227.
29. Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
30. Magnifico, A. M. (2010).Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation and a writer's audience. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 167-184.
31. Matsumara, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students' preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. Modern Language Journal, 88, 403-415.
32. McGee, P., & Diaz, V. (2007, September/October). Wikis and Podcasts and Blogs! Oh, My! What is a faculty member supposed to do? EDUCAUSE Review, 42(5). Retrieved from http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/diaz/pubs/ER7-17-07.pdf
33. Min, H. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision typos and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141.
34. Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293-308.
35. Namvar, Y., Naderi, E., Shariatmadari, A., & Seifnaraghi, M. (2009). Studying the impact of web-based learning (weblog) with a problem solving approach on student's reflective thinking. iJET, 4(4), 33-38. Retrieved from http://www.uh.cu/static/documents/STA/Studying%20Impact%20WebBased%20Learning. pdf
36. Nelson, T., & Fernheimer, J. (2003). Welcome to the blogosphere: Using weblogs to create classroom community. Computer Writing and Research Lab, White Paper Series: #030822-1, 1-15.
37. Oravec, J. A. (2003). Blogs as an emerging genre in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 21-44.
38. O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Retrieved from http://www. oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
39. Porter, J. E. (1998). Rhetorical ethics and internetworked writing. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
40. Raith, T. (2009). The use of weblogs in language education. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 274-291). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
41. Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dosingerm, G., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87-107.
42. Rolliston, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.
43. Rourke, A., Mendelssohn, J., Coleman K., & Allen, B. (2008). Did I mention it's anonymous? The triumphs and pitfalls of online peer review. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of the Ascilite 2008 Conference, Institute of Teaching and Learning, Deakin University (pp. 830-840). Australia: Melbourne. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/rourke.pdf
44. Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning-A critical review. Institute of Education, University of London, UK.
45. Sollars, V. (2007). Writing experiences in a second/foreign language classroom: From theory to practice. In M. Camilleri, P. Ford, H. Leja, & V. Sollars (Eds.), Blogs: Web journal in language education (pp. 15-24). Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
46. Sun, Y. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88-103. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num2/sun.pdf
47. Thomas, M. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
48. Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21, 217-235.
50. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
51. Wang, H. C. (2009). Weblog-mediated peer editing and some pedagogical recommendations: A case study. The JALT CALL Journal, 5(2), 29-44.
52. Ward, J. (2004). Blog assisted language learning (BALL): Push button publishing for the pupils. TEFL Web Journal, 3(1), 1-16.
53. Ware, D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Context and issues (pp. 105-121). London: Cambridge University Press.
54. Ware, P. D., & O'Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology 12(1), 43-63.
55. Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-23
56. Wu, C. (2006). Blogs in TEFL: A new promising vehicle. US-China Education Review, 3(5), 69-73. Retrieved from: http://www.teacher.org.cn/doc/ucedu200605/ ucedu20060512.pdf