Fostering revision of argumentative writing through structured peer assessment

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 210-221

  Tsai, Ya Chin ^a   Chuang, Min Tun ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAYI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PEER GROUP; PEER REVIEW; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; WRITING;

ADULT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PEER GROUP; PEER REVIEW; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; WRITING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877711047     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: 1558688X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/10.23.PMS.116.1.210-221     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bakeman, R. (2005) Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures design. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 379-384.
2. Blain, S. (2001) Study of verbal peer feedback on the improvement of the quality of writing and the transfer of knowledge in Francophone students in Grade 4 living in a minority situation in Canada. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 14, 156-170.
3. Breuch, L-A. J. (2004) Virtual peer review: teaching and learning about writing in online environments. New York: State Univer. of New York.
4. Cameron, C. A., Edmunds, G., Wigmore, B., Hunt, A. K., & Linton, M. J. (1997) C hildren's revision of textual flaws. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 667-680.
5. Cheunga, Y. L. (2011) Critical feedback on peer review research. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 535-538.
6. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994) Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257-276.
7. Davis, J., & Liss, R. (2006) Effective academic writing 3: the essay. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
8. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981) Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
9. Fitzgerald, J. (1994) Revision. In A. C. Puves, L. Papa, & S. Jordan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of English studies and language arts: a project of the National Council of Teachers of English. Vol. 2. New York: Scholastic. Pp. 1045-1047.
10. Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005) Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59, 31-38.
11. Hewett, B. L. (2000) Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Composition, 17, 265-288.
12. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006) Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101.
13. Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2002) Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: Michigan Univer. Press.
14. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009) To give is better than to receive: the benefits of peer review to the reviewers' own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.
15. Mendonça, C., & Johnson, K. E. (1994) Peer review negotiations: revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
16. Min, H. (2005) The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141.
17. Nelson, G., & Carson, J. G. (1998) ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113-131.
18. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003) Generalized that and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434-447.
19. Peterson, S. (2003) Peer response and students' revisions of their narrative writing. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 239-272.
20. Porte, G. (1996) When writing fails: how academic content and paste learning experiences shape revision. System, 24, 107-116.
21. Rollinson, P. (1998) Peer response and revision in an ESL writing group: a case study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univer. Autonoma de Madrid.
22. Rollinson, P. (2005) Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59, 227-252.
23. Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004) Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8, 31-54.
24. Shaw, V. N. (2002) Peer review as a motivating device in the training of writing skills for college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33, 68-76.
25. Sommers, N. (1982) Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156.
26. Tsai, Y. C. (2009) A synchronous peer review and revision: on written argument. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM.
27. Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147-170.
28. Tuzi, F. (2004) The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21, 217-235.
29. Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. (1998) Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19, 491-514.
30. Yasuda, S. (2004) Revising strategies in ESL academic writing: a case study of Japanese postgraduate student writers. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14, 91-112.
31. Yeh, H., & Yang, Y. (2011) Prospective teachers' insights towards scaffolding students' writing processes through teacher-student role reversal in an online system. Education Technology Research and Development, 59, 351-368.