Impacts of a digital dialogue game and epistemic beliefs on argumentative discourse and willingness to argue

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 208-230

  Noroozi, Omid ^a   McAlister, Simon ^b   Mulder, Martin ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Attitudinal change; Dialogue; Digital game; Epistemic beliefs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969262206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14923831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2297     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aleixandre-Jimenez, M. (2007). Designing argumentation learning environments. In S. Erduran., & M. Aleixandre-Jimenez (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 91-115). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_5
2. Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443-460). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3. Balaban-Sali, J. (2008). Designing motivational learning systems in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(3), 149-161.
4. Chaiprasurt, C., & Esichaikul, V. (2013). Enhancing motivation in online courses with mobile communication tool support: A comparative study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 377-401.
5. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378-405. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
6. Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011965830686
7. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
8. Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(1), 72-80. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13
9. King, P., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham-Shum, S. J., & Carr, C. S. (Eds.). (2003). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. London, UK: Springer.
11. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309-328. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
12. McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 194-204. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00086.x
13. McLaren, B. M., Scheuer, O., & Mikšátko, J. (2010). Supporting collaborative learning and e-discussions using artificial intelligence techniques. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20(1), 1-46.
14. Miyake, N. (2007). Computer supported collaborative learning. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), Handbook of e-learning research (pp. 263-280). London, UK: Sage
15. Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173-190. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520701416306
16. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2011). Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(1), 309-318. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.009
17. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in a multidisciplinary CSCL environment. Learning and Instruction, 25(1), 1-12. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.002
18. Noroozi, O., Busstra, M.C., Mulder, M., Biemans, H.J.A., Tobi, H., Geelen, M.M.E.E.,... Chizari, M. (2012). Online discussion compensates for suboptimal timing of supportive information presentation in a digitally supported learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 193-221. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9217-2
19. Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 189-223. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9162-z
20. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A systematic review and synthesis of fifteen years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79-106. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006
21. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers and Education, 61(2), 59-76. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013
22. Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573-595. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00062-0
23. Nussbaum, E. M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G. M., Reynolds, R. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (2004). Personality interactions and scaffolding in on-line discussions. Educational Computing Research, 30(1-2), 113-137. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/H8P4-QJUF-JXME-6JD8
24. Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, M. G., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977-1999. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690701545919
25. Oh, S., & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95-110. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00206.x
26. O'Keefe, D. J. (1982). The concept of argument and arguing. In J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 3-23). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
27. Osborne, J. F. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
28. Pinkwart, N., Ashley, K. D., Lynch, C., & Aleven, V. (2009). Evaluating an intelligent tutoring system for making legal arguments with hypotheticals. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(4), 401-424.
29. Rau, P.L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L. M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 50(1), 1-22. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.008
30. Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 139-160.
31. Ravenscroft, A., & McAlister, S. (2006). Digital games and learning in cyberspace: A dialogical approach. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(1), 37-50. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.1.37
32. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43-102. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x
33. Sharan, S., & Shaulov, A. (1990). Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 173-202). New York, NY: Praeger.
34. Suthers, D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 27-46). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
35. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 46(1), 71-95. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003