Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 525-536

  Li, Lan ^a   Liu, Xiongyi ^b   Steckelberg, Allen L ^c  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; PEER ASSESSMENT; PEER FEEDBACK; STUDENT LEARNING; STUDENT PROJECT; TEACHER EDUCATION; TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

COMPUTER CRIME; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77951102001     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. A rubric for evaluating WebQuest (n.d.). A rubric for evaluating WebQuest. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/ webquestrubric.html
2. Althauser, R. Darnall, K. (2001). Enhancing critical reading and writing through peer reviews: an exploration of assisted performance. Teaching Sociology, 29, 1, 23 35.
3. Brindley, C. Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 1, 79 80.
4. Brown, S. (2007). Feedback & feedforward. Center for Bioscience Bulletin, 22, 1. Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://www.bioscience. heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/newsletters/bulletin22.pdf
5. Cheng, W. Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 3, 301 314.
6. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 4, 346 354.
7. Li, L. Steckelberg, A. (2006). Perceptions of web-mediated peer assessment. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10, 2, 265 269.
8. Li, L. Steckelberg, A. L. (2005). Impact of technology-mediated peer assessment on student project quality. In M. Simonson M. Crawford (Eds. Proceedings of Association for Educational Communications and Technology International Conference 2005 (pp. 307 313).
9. Li, L., Steckelberg, A. L. Srinivasan, S. (in press). Utilizing peer interactions to promote learning through a computer-assisted peer assessment system. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology.
10. Orsmond, P. Merry, S. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 3, 239 250.
11. Pope, N. (2001). An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 3, 235 246.
12. Some thoughts about WebQuests (n.d.). Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about-webquests.html
13. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 1, 69 75.
14. Sung, Y.-T., Chen-Shan Lin, J., Chi-Lung Lee, J. Chang, K.-E. (2003). Evaluating proposals for experiments: an application of web-based self-assessment and peer assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 4, 331 333.
15. Tabachnick, B. G. Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.).
16. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 3, 249 276.
17. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I. Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 2, 149 169.
18. Venables, A. Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 40, 3, 281 290.