Spatiotemporal regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 82-94

  Sivakumar, Sushama ^a   Gorbsky, Gary J ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; PHOSPHATASE; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN KINASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN;

ANAPHASE; ANEUPLOIDY; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOKINESIS; HUMAN; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEX-CYCLOSOME; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOKINESIS; HUMANS; MITOSIS;

EID: 84923195900     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm3934     Document Type: Review

References (200)

1. Satyanarayana, A. & Kaldis, P. Mammalian cell-cycle regulation: several Cdks, numerous cyclins and diverse compensatory mechanisms. Oncogene 28, 2925-2939 (2009).
2. Nakayama, K. I. & Nakayama, K. Regulation of the cell cycle by SCF-type ubiquitin ligases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 323-333 (2005).
3. Weissman, A. M. Themes and variations on ubiquitylation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 169-178 (2001).
4. Nakayama, K. I. & Nakayama, K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 6, 369-381 (2006).
5. Mocciaro, A. & Rape, M. Emerging regulatory mechanisms in ubiquitin-dependent cell cycle control. J. Cell Sci. 125, 255-263 (2012).
6. Hicke, L. Protein regulation by monoubiquitin. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 195-201 (2001).
7. Matsumoto, M. L. et al. K11-linked polyubiquitination in cell cycle control revealed by a K11 linkage-specific antibody. Mol. Cell 39, 477-484 (2010).
8. Pickart, C. M. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 503-533 (2001).
9. Ye, Y. & Rape, M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 755-764 (2009).
10. Bassermann, F., Eichner, R. & Pagano, M. The ubiquitin proteasome system-implications for cell cycle control and the targeted treatment of cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 150-162 (2014).
11. Sudakin, V. et al. The cyclosome, a large complex containing cyclin-selective ubiquitin ligase activity, targets cyclins for destruction at the end of mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 185-197 (1995).
12. King, R. W. et al. A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell 81, 279-288 (1995).
13. Irniger, S., Piatti, S., Michaelis, C. & Nasmyth, K. Genes involved in sister chromatid separation are needed for B-type cyclin proteolysis in budding yeast. Cell 81, 269-278 (1995). References 11-13 identified the APC/C as a E3 ubiquitin ligase that is required for cyclin proteolysis in clam (reference 11), X. laevis (reference12) and yeast (reference 13).
14. Chang, L., Zhang, Z., Yang, J., McLaughlin, S. H. & Barford, D. Molecular architecture and mechanism of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 513, 388-393 (2014).
15. Herzog, F. et al. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 323, 1477-1481 (2009).
16. Ohi, M. D. et al. Structural organization of the anaphase-promoting complex bound to the mitotic activator Slp1. Mol. Cell 28, 871-885 (2007).
17. Dube, P. et al. Localization of the coactivator Cdh1 and the cullin subunit Apc2 in a cryo-electron microscopy model of vertebrate APC/C. Mol. Cell 20, 867-879 (2005).
18. Passmore, L. A. et al. Structural analysis of the anaphase-promoting complex reveals multiple active sites and insights into polyubiquitylation. Mol. Cell 20, 855-866 (2005).
19. Schreiber, A. et al. Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 470, 227-232 (2011).
20. Uzunova, K. et al. APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/C(MCC) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1116-1123 (2012).
21. Primorac, I. & Musacchio, A. Panta rhei: the APC/C at steady state. J. Cell Biol. 201, 177-189 (2013).
22. Wang, J., Dye, B. T., Rajashankar, K. R., Kurinov, I. & Schulman, B. A. Insights into anaphase promoting complex TPR subdomain assembly from a CDC26-APC6 structure. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 987-989 (2009).
23. Zhang, Z. et al. The four canonical TPR subunits of human APC/C form related homo-dimeric structures and stack in parallel to form a TPR suprahelix. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4236-4248 (2013).
24. Meyer, H. J. & Rape, M. Processive ubiquitin chain formation by the anaphase-promoting complex. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 544-550 (2011).
25. Rodrigo-Brenni, M. C. & Morgan, D. O. Sequential E2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on APC targets. Cell 130, 127-139 (2007).
26. Brown, N. G. et al. Mechanism of polyubiquitination by human anaphase-promoting complex: RING repurposing for ubiquitin chain assembly. Mol. Cell 56, 246-260 (2014).
27. Williamson, A. et al. Regulation of ubiquitin chain initiation to control the timing of substrate degradation. Mol. Cell 42, 744-757 (2011).
28. Yu, H., King, R. W., Peters, J. M. & Kirschner, M. W. Identification of a novel ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme involved in mitotic cyclin degradation. Curr. Biol. 6, 455-466 (1996).
29. Aristarkhov, A. et al. E2-C, a cyclin-selective ubiquitin carrier protein required for the destruction of mitotic cyclins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4294-4299 (1996).
30. Kirkpatrick, D. S. et al. Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 700-710 (2006).
31. Williamson, A. et al. Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18213-18218 (2009).
32. Jin, L., Williamson, A., Banerjee, S., Philipp, I. & Rape, M. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell 133, 653-665 (2008).
33. Wu, T. et al. UBE2S drives elongation of K11-linked ubiquitin chains by the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1355-1360 (2010).
34. Garnett, M. J. et al. UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains on APC/C substrates to promote mitotic exit. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 1363-1369 (2009).
35. Kelly, A., Wickliffe, K. E., Song, L., Fedrigo, I. & Rape, M. Ubiquitin chain elongation requires E3-dependent tracking of the emerging conjugate. Mol. Cell 56, 232-245 (2014).
36. Pines, J. Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 427-438 (2011).
37. Meyer, H. J. & Rape, M. Enhanced protein degradation by branched ubiquitin chains. Cell 157, 910-921 (2014).
38. Stegmeier, F. et al. Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature 446, 876-881 (2007).
39. Huang, X. et al. Deubiquitinase USP37 is activated by CDK2 to antagonize APC(CDH1) and promote S phase entry. Mol. Cell 42, 511-523 (2011).
40. Kraft, C., Vodermaier, H. C., Maurer-Stroh, S., Eisenhaber, F. & Peters, J. M. The WD40 propeller domain of Cdh1 functions as a destruction box receptor for APC/C substrates. Mol. Cell 18, 543-553 (2005).
41. Kimata, Y., Baxter, J. E., Fry, A. M. & Yamano, H. A role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 family of proteins in activation of the APC/C distinct from substrate recruitment. Mol. Cell 32, 576-583 (2008).
42. Van Voorhis, V. A. & Morgan, D. O. Activation of the APC/C ubiquitin ligase by enhanced E2 efficiency. Curr. Biol. 24, 1556-1562 (2014).
43. Rudner, A. D., Hardwick, K. G. & Murray, A. W. Cdc28 activates exit from mitosis in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 149, 1361-1376 (2000).
44. Rudner, A. D. & Murray, A. W. Phosphorylation by Cdc28 activates the Cdc20-dependent activity of the anaphase-promoting complex. J. Cell Biol. 149, 1377-1390 (2000).
45. Kramer, E. R., Scheuringer, N., Podtelejnikov, A. V., Mann, M. & Peters, J. M. Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1555-1569 (2000).
46. Kraft, C. et al. Mitotic regulation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by phosphorylation. EMBO J. 22, 6598-6609 (2003).
47. Shteinberg, M., Protopopov, Y., Listovsky, T., Brandeis, M. & Hershko, A. Phosphorylation of the cyclosome is required for its stimulation by Fizzy/cdc20. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260, 193-198 (1999).
48. Golan, A., Yudkovsky, Y. & Hershko, A. The cyclin-ubiquitin ligase activity of cyclosome/APC is jointly activated by protein kinases Cdk1-cyclin B and Plk. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 15552-15557 (2002).
49. Chung, E. & Chen, R. H. Phosphorylation of Cdc20 is required for its inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 748-753 (2003).
50. Labit, H. et al. Dephosphorylation of Cdc20 is required for its C-box-dependent activation of the APC/C. EMBO J. 31, 3351-3362 (2012).
51. Tang, Z., Shu, H., Oncel, D., Chen, S. & Yu, H. Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 provides a catalytic mechanism for APC/C inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Mol. Cell 16, 387-397 (2004).
52. Yudkovsky, Y., Shteinberg, M., Listovsky, T., Brandeis, M. & Hershko, A. Phosphorylation of Cdc20/fizzy negatively regulates the mammalian cyclosome/APC in the mitotic checkpoint. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 271, 299-304 (2000).
53. D'Angiolella, V., Mari, C., Nocera, D., Rametti, L. & Grieco, D. The spindle checkpoint requires cyclin-dependent kinase activity. Genes Dev. 17, 2520-2525 (2003).
54. Zachariae, W., Schwab, M., Nasmyth, K. & Seufert, W. Control of cyclin ubiquitination by CDK-regulated binding of Hct1 to the anaphase promoting complex. Science 282, 1721-1724 (1998).
55. Jaspersen, S. L., Charles, J. F. & Morgan, D. O. Inhibitory phosphorylation of the APC regulator Hct1 is controlled by the kinase Cdc28 and the phosphatase Cdc14. Curr. Biol. 9, 227-236 (1999).
56. Matyskiela, M. E., Rodrigo-Brenni, M. C. & Morgan, D. O. Mechanisms of ubiquitin transfer by the anaphase-promoting complex. J. Biol. 8, 92 (2009).
57. Listovsky, T. & Sale, J. E. Sequestration of CDH1 by MAD2L2 prevents premature APC/C activation prior to anaphase onset. J. Cell Biol. 203, 87-100 (2013).
58. Glotzer, M., Murray, A. W. & Kirschner, M. W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349, 132-138 (1991).
59. King, R. W., Glotzer, M. & Kirschner, M. W. Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1343-1357 (1996).
60. Yamano, H., Tsurumi, C., Gannon, J. & Hunt, T. The role of the destruction box and its neighbouring lysine residues in cyclin B for anaphase ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in fission yeast: defining the D-box receptor. EMBO J. 17, 5670-5678 (1998).
61. Zur, A. & Brandeis, M. Securin degradation is mediated by fzy and fzr, and is required for complete chromatid separation but not for cytokinesis. EMBO J. 20, 792-801 (2001).
62. He, J. et al. Insights into degron recognition by APC/C coactivators from the structure of an Acm1-Cdh1 complex. Mol. Cell 50, 649-660 (2013).
63. Pfleger, C. M. & Kirschner, M. W. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev. 14, 655-665 (2000).
64. Pfleger, C. M., Lee, E. & Kirschner, M. W. Substrate recognition by the Cdc20 and Cdh1 components of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 15, 2396-2407 (2001).
65. Passmore, L. A. & Barford, D. Coactivator functions in a stoichiometric complex with anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome to mediate substrate recognition. EMBO Rep. 6, 873-878 (2005).
66. da Fonseca, P. C. et al. Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor. Nature 470, 274-278 (2011).
67. Buschhorn, B. A. et al. Substrate binding on the APC/C occurs between the coactivator Cdh1 and the processivity factor Doc1. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 6-13 (2011).
68. Carroll, C. W. & Morgan, D. O. The Doc1 subunit is a processivity factor for the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 880-887 (2002).
69. Carroll, C. W., Enquist-Newman, M. & Morgan, D. O. The APC subunit Doc1 promotes recognition of the substrate destruction box. Curr. Biol. 15, 11-18 (2005).
70. Tian, W. et al. Structural analysis of human Cdc20 supports multisite degron recognition by APC/C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18419-18424 (2012).
71. Passmore, L. A. et al. Doc1 mediates the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex by contributing to substrate recognition. EMBO J. 22, 786-796 (2003).
72. Matyskiela, M. E. & Morgan, D. O. Analysis of activator-binding sites on the APC/C supports a cooperative substrate-binding mechanism. Mol. Cell 34, 68-80 (2009).
73. Chao, W. C., Kulkarni, K., Zhang, Z., Kong, E. H. & Barford, D. Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 484, 208-213 (2012).
74. Matsusaka, T., Enquist-Newman, M., Morgan, D. O. & Pines, J. Co-Activator independent differences in how the metaphase and anaphase APC/C recognise the same substrate. Biol. Open 3, 904-912 (2014).
75. Wasch, R., Robbins, J. A. & Cross, F. R. The emerging role of APC/CCdh1 in controlling differentiation, genomic stability and tumor suppression. Oncogene 29, 1-10 (2010).
76. Mailand, N. & Diffley, J. F. CDKs promote DNA replication origin licensing in human cells by protecting Cdc6 from APC/C-dependent proteolysis. Cell 122, 915-926 (2005).
77. Rodier, G., Coulombe, P., Tanguay, P. L., Boutonnet, C. & Meloche, S. Phosphorylation of Skp2 regulated by CDK2 and Cdc14B protects it from degradation by APC(Cdh1) in G1 phase. EMBO J. 27, 679-691 (2008).
78. Hellmuth, S., Bottger, F., Pan, C., Mann, M. & Stemmann, O. PP2A delays APC/C-dependent degradation of separase-Associated but not free securin. EMBO J. 33, 1134-1147 (2014).
79. Choi, E. et al. BubR1 acetylation at prometaphase is required for modulating APC/C activity and timing of mitosis. EMBO J. 28, 2077-2089 (2009).
80. Song, L., Craney, A. & Rape, M. Microtubule-dependent regulation of mitotic protein degradation. Mol. Cell 53, 179-192 (2014).
81. Patra, D. & Dunphy, W. G. Xe-p9, a Xenopus Suc1/Cks protein, is essential for the Cdc2-dependent phosphorylation of the anaphase-promoting complex at mitosis. Genes Dev. 12, 2549-2559 (1998).
82. Shteinberg, M. & Hershko, A. Role of Suc1 in the activation of the cyclosome by protein kinase Cdk1/cyclin B. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 257, 12-18 (1999).
83. Wolthuis, R. et al. Cdc20 and Cks direct the spindle checkpoint-independent destruction of cyclin A. Mol. Cell 30, 290-302 (2008).
84. Bourne, Y. et al. Crystal structure and mutational analysis of the human CDK2 kinase complex with cell cycle-regulatory protein CksHs1. Cell 84, 863-874 (1996).
85. Sudakin, V., Shteinberg, M., Ganoth, D., Hershko, J. & Hershko, A. Binding of activated cyclosome to p13(suc1). Use for affinity purification. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18051-18059 (1997).
86. Polinko, E. S. & Strome, S. Depletion of a Cks homolog in C. elegans embryos uncovers a post-metaphase role in both meiosis and mitosis. Curr. Biol. 10, 1471-1474 (2000).
87. Swan, A., Barcelo, G. & Schupbach, T. Drosophila Cks30A interacts with Cdk1 to target Cyclin A for destruction in the female germline. Development 132, 3669-3678 (2005).
88. Lenart, P. et al. The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Curr. Biol. 17, 304-315 (2007).
89. Topper, L. M. et al. The dephosphorylated form of the anaphase-promoting complex protein Cdc27/Apc3 concentrates on kinetochores and chromosome arms in mitosis. Cell Cycle 1, 282-292 (2002).
90. Sivakumar, S., Daum, J. R., Tipton, A. R., Rankin, S. & Gorbsky, G. J. The spindle and kinetochore-Associated (SKA) complex enhances binding of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) to chromosomes and promotes mitotic exit. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 594-605 (2014).
91. Tugendreich, S., Tomkiel, J., Earnshaw, W. & Hieter, P. CDC27Hs colocalizes with CDC16Hs to the centrosome and mitotic spindle and is essential for the metaphase to anaphase transition. Cell 81, 261-268 (1995).
92. Jorgensen, P. M., Brundell, E., Starborg, M. & Hoog, C. A subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex is a centromere-Associated protein in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 468-476 (1998).
93. Acquaviva, C., Herzog, F., Kraft, C. & Pines, J. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome is recruited to centromeres by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 892-898 (2004).
94. Ban, K. H. et al. The END network couples spindle pole assembly to inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in early mitosis. Dev. Cell 13, 29-42 (2007).
95. Torres, J. Z., Ban, K. H. & Jackson, P. K. A specific form of phospho protein phosphatase 2 regulates anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome association with spindle poles. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 897-904 (2010).
96. Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E. D. The spindle-Assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393 (2007).
97. Foley, E. A. & Kapoor, T. M. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 25-37 (2013).
98. Lara-Gonzalez, P., Westhorpe, F. G. & Taylor, S. S. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22, R966-R980 (2012).
99. London, N. & Biggins, S. Signalling dynamics in the spindle checkpoint response. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 736-748 (2014).
100. van Zon, W. & Wolthuis, R. M. Cyclin A and Nek2A: APC/C-Cdc20 substrates invisible to the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 72-77 (2010).
101. den Elzen, N. & Pines, J. Cyclin A is destroyed in prometaphase and can delay chromosome alignment and anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 153, 121-136 (2001).
102. Geley, S. et al. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 153, 137-148 (2001).
103. Hayes, M. J. et al. Early mitotic degradation of Nek2A depends on Cdc20-independent interaction with the APC/C. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 607-614 (2006).
104. Hames, R. S., Wattam, S. L., Yamano, H., Bacchieri, R. & Fry, A. M. APC/C-mediated destruction of the centrosomal kinase Nek2A occurs in early mitosis and depends upon a cyclin A-type D-box. EMBO J. 20, 7117-7127 (2001).
105. Di Fiore, B. & Pines, J. How cyclin A destruction escapes the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 190, 501-509 (2010).
106. Lu, D. et al. Multiple mechanisms determine the order of APC/C substrate degradation in mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 207, 23-39 (2014).
107. Sedgwick, G. G. et al. Mechanisms controlling the temporal degradation of Nek2A and Kif18A by the APC/C-Cdc20 complex. EMBO J. 32, 303-314 (2013).
108. Collin, P., Nashchekina, O., Walker, R. & Pines, J. The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch. Nature Cell Biol. 15, 1378-1385 (2013).
109. Mena, A. L., Lam, E. W. & Chatterjee, S. Sustained spindle-Assembly checkpoint response requires de novo transcription and translation of cyclin B1. PLoS ONE 5, e13037 (2010).
110. Zeng, X. et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex induces a spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest in the absence of spindle damage. Cancer Cell 18, 382-395 (2010).
111. Varetti, G., Guida, C., Santaguida, S., Chiroli, E. & Musacchio, A. Homeostatic control of mitotic arrest. Mol. Cell 44, 710-720 (2011).
112. Brito, D. A. & Rieder, C. L. Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 16, 1194-1200 (2006).
113. Gascoigne, K. E. & Taylor, S. S. Cancer cells display profound intra-And interline variation following prolonged exposure to antimitotic drugs. Cancer Cell 14, 111-122 (2008).
114. Santaguida, S., Vernieri, C., Villa, F., Ciliberto, A. & Musacchio, A. Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction. EMBO J. 30, 1508-1519 (2011).
115. De Antoni, A. et al. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15, 214-225 (2005).
116. Kulukian, A., Han, J. S. & Cleveland, D. W. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev. Cell 16, 105-117 (2009).
117. Fang, G. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 755-766 (2002).
118. Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. & Yen, T. J. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936 (2001).
119. Hardwick, K. G., Johnston, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Murray, A. W. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J. Cell Biol. 148, 871-882 (2000).
120. Fraschini, R. et al. Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores. EMBO J. 20, 6648-6659 (2001). References 118-120 report that the APC/C is inhibited by the MCC, which is a complex composed of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20 and MAD2 proteins.
121. Rischitor, P. E., May, K. M. & Hardwick, K. G. Bub1 is a fission yeast kinetochore scaffold protein, and is sufficient to recruit other spindle checkpoint proteins to ectopic sites on chromosomes. PLoS ONE 2, e1342 (2007).
122. Williams, G. L., Roberts, T. M. & Gjoerup, O. V. Bub1: escapades in a cellular world. Cell Cycle 6, 1699-1704 (2007).
123. Lara-Gonzalez, P., Scott, M. I., Diez, M., Sen, O. & Taylor, S. S. BubR1 blocks substrate recruitment to the APC/C in a KEN-box-dependent manner. J. Cell Sci. 124, 4332-4345 (2011).
124. Izawa, D. & Pines, J. The mitotic checkpoint complex binds a second CDC20 to inhibit active APC/C. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13911 (2014).
125. Izawa, D. & Pines, J. Mad2 and the APC/C compete for the same site on Cdc20 to ensure proper chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 199, 27-37 (2012).
126. Zhang, Y. & Lees, E. Identification of an overlapping binding domain on Cdc20 for Mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5190-5199 (2001).
127. Foster, S. A. & Morgan, D. O. The APC/C subunit Mnd2/Apc15 promotes Cdc20 autoubiquitination and spindle assembly checkpoint inactivation. Mol. Cell 47, 921-932 (2012).
128. Mansfeld, J., Collin, P., Collins, M. O., Choudhary, J. S. & Pines, J. APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 1234-1243 (2011). References 127 and 128, along with reference 20, show that APC15 is required for CDC20 turnover, which promotes spindle checkpoint inactivation and hence mitotic exit.
129. Chang, L. & Barford, D. Insights into the anaphase-promoting complex: a molecular machine that regulates mitosis. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 29C, 1-9 (2014).
130. Daum, J. R. et al. Cohesion fatigue induces chromatid separation in cells delayed at metaphase. Curr. Biol. 21, 1018-1024 (2011).
131. Stevens, D., Gassmann, R., Oegema, K. & Desai, A. Uncoordinated loss of chromatid cohesion is a common outcome of extended metaphase arrest. PLoS ONE 6, e22969 (2011).
132. Eytan, E., Sitry-Shevah, D., Teichner, A. & Hershko, A. Roles of different pools of the mitotic checkpoint complex and the mechanisms of their disassembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10568-10573 (2013).
133. Liang, H., Lim, H. H., Venkitaraman, A. & Surana, U. Cdk1 promotes kinetochore bi-orientation and regulates Cdc20 expression during recovery from spindle checkpoint arrest. EMBO J. 31, 403-416 (2012).
134. Pan, J. & Chen, R. H. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 18, 1439-1451 (2004).
135. Nilsson, J. Cdc20 control of cell fate during prolonged mitotic arrest: do Cdc20 protein levels affect cell fate in response to antimitotic compounds? Bioessays 33, 903-909 (2011).
136. Musacchio, A. & Ciliberto, A. The spindle-Assembly checkpoint and the beauty of self-destruction. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1059-1061 (2012).
137. Reddy, S. K., Rape, M., Margansky, W. A. & Kirschner, M. W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446, 921-925 (2007).
138. Sackton, K. L. et al. Synergistic blockade of mitotic exit by two chemical inhibitors of the APC/C. Nature 514, 646-649 (2014).
139. Lara-Gonzalez, P. & Taylor, S. S. Cohesion fatigue explains why pharmacological inhibition of the APC/C induces a spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest. PLoS ONE 7, e49041 (2012).
140. Xia, G. et al. Conformation-specific binding of p31comet antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 23, 3133-3143 (2004).
141. Yang, M. et al. p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 131, 744-755 (2007).
142. Mapelli, M. et al. Determinants of conformational dimerization of Mad2 and its inhibition by p31comet. EMBO J. 25, 1273-1284 (2006).
143. Vink, M. et al. In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics. Curr. Biol. 16, 755-766 (2006).
144. Jia, L. et al. Defining pathways of spindle checkpoint silencing: functional redundancy between Cdc20 ubiquitination and p31comet. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4227-4235 (2011).
145. Hagan, R. S. et al. p31comet acts to ensure timely spindle checkpoint silencing subsequent to kinetochore attachment. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4236-4246 (2011).
146. Ma, H. T., Chan, Y. Y., Chen, X., On, K. F. & Poon, R. Y. Depletion of p31comet protein promotes sensitivity to antimitotic drugs. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 21561-21569 (2012).
147. Westhorpe, F. G., Tighe, A., Lara-Gonzalez, P. & Taylor, S. S. p31comet-mediated extraction of Mad2 from the MCC promotes efficient mitotic exit. J. Cell Sci. 124, 3905-3916 (2011).
148. Teichner, A. et al. p31comet promotes disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex in an ATP-dependent process. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3187-3192 (2011).
149. Miniowitz-Shemtov, S., Teichner, A., Sitry-Shevah, D. & Hershko, A. ATP is required for the release of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome from inhibition by the mitotic checkpoint. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5351-5356 (2010).
150. Eytan, E. et al. Disassembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes by the joint action of the AAA-ATPase TRIP13 and p31comet. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12019-12024 (2014).
151. Nilsson, J., Yekezare, M., Minshull, J. & Pines, J. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 1411-1420 (2008).
152. Gao, Y. F. et al. Cdk1-phosphorylated CUEDC2 promotes spindle checkpoint inactivation and chromosomal instability. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 924-933 (2011).
153. Dick, A. E. & Gerlich, D. W. Kinetic framework of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. Nature Cell Biol. 15, 1370-1377 (2013).
154. Bader, J. R. & Vaughan, K. T. Dynein at the kinetochore: timing, interactions and functions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 269-275 (2010).
155. Howell, B. J. et al. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1159-1172 (2001).
156. Wojcik, E. et al. Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the rough deal checkpoint protein. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 1001-1007 (2001).
157. Lesage, B., Qian, J. & Bollen, M. Spindle checkpoint silencing: PP1 tips the balance. Curr. Biol. 21, R898-903 (2011).
158. Gaitanos, T. N. et al. Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J. 28, 1442-1452 (2009).
159. Welburn, J. P. et al. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell 16, 374-385 (2009).
160. Daum, J. R. et al. Ska3 is required for spindle checkpoint silencing and the maintenance of chromosome cohesion in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 19, 1467-1472 (2009).
161. Sivakumar, S., Daum, J. R., Tipton, A. R., Rankin, S. & Gorbsky, G. J. The spindle and kinetochore-Associated (Ska) complex enhances binding of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) to chromosomes and promotes mitotic exit. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 594-605 (2014).
162. Potapova, T. A., Sivakumar, S., Flynn, J. N., Li, R. & Gorbsky, G. J. Mitotic progression becomes irreversible in prometaphase and collapses when Wee1 and Cdc25 are inhibited. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 1191-1206 (2011).
163. Pfleger, C. M., Salic, A., Lee, E. & Kirschner, M. W. Inhibition of Cdh1-APC by the MAD2-related protein MAD2L2: a novel mechanism for regulating Cdh1. Genes Dev. 15, 1759-1764 (2001).
164. Sigl, R. et al. Loss of the mammalian APC/C activator FZR1 shortens G1 and lengthens S phase but has little effect on exit from mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 122, 4208-4217 (2009).
165. Garcia-Higuera, I. et al. Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor Cdh1. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 802-811 (2008).
166. Floyd, S., Pines, J. & Lindon, C. APC/C Cdh1 targets aurora kinase to control reorganization of the mitotic spindle at anaphase. Curr. Biol. 18, 1649-1658 (2008).
167. Blanco, M. A., Sanchez-Diaz, A., de Prada, J. M. & Moreno, S. APC(ste9/srw1) promotes degradation of mitotic cyclins in G1 and is inhibited by cdc2 phosphorylation. EMBO J. 19, 3945-3955 (2000).
168. Sigrist, S. J. & Lehner, C. F. Drosophila fizzy-related down-regulates mitotic cyclins and is required for cell proliferation arrest and entry into endocycles. Cell 90, 671-681 (1997).
169. Schwab, M., Lutum, A. S. & Seufert, W. Yeast Hct1 is a regulator of Clb2 cyclin proteolysis. Cell 90, 683-693 (1997).
170. Visintin, R., Prinz, S. & Amon, A. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278, 460-463 (1997).
171. Clute, P. & Pines, J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 82-87 (1999).
172. Huang, J. & Raff, J. W. The disappearance of cyclin B at the end of mitosis is regulated spatially in Drosophila cells. EMBO J. 18, 2184-2195 (1999).
173. Shindo, N., Kumada, K. & Hirota, T. Separase sensor reveals dual roles for separase coordinating cohesin cleavage and cdk1 inhibition. Dev. Cell 23, 112-123 (2012).
174. Yaakov, G., Thorn, K. & Morgan, D. O. Separase biosensor reveals that cohesin cleavage timing depends on phosphatase PP2A(Cdc55) regulation. Dev. Cell 23, 124-136 (2012).
175. Rape, M. & Kirschner, M. W. Autonomous regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex couples mitosis to S-phase entry. Nature 432, 588-595 (2004).
176. Listovsky, T. et al. Mammalian Cdh1/Fzr mediates its own degradation. EMBO J. 23, 1619-1626 (2004).
177. Martinez, J. S., Jeong, D. E., Choi, E., Billings, B. M. & Hall, M. C. Acm1 is a negative regulator of the CDH1-dependent anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 9162-9176 (2006).
178. Grosskortenhaus, R. & Sprenger, F. Rca1 inhibits APC-Cdh1(Fzr) and is required to prevent cyclin degradation in G2. Dev. Cell 2, 29-40 (2002).
179. Reimann, J. D. et al. Emi1 is a mitotic regulator that interacts with Cdc20 and inhibits the anaphase promoting complex. Cell 105, 645-655 (2001).
180. Ostapenko, D., Burton, J. L., Wang, R. & Solomon, M. J. Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4653-4664 (2008).
181. Enquist-Newman, M., Sullivan, M. & Morgan, D. O. Modulation of the mitotic regulatory network by APC-dependent destruction of the Cdh1 inhibitor Acm1. Mol. Cell 30, 437-446 (2008).
182. Reimann, J. D., Gardner, B. E., Margottin-Goguet, F. & Jackson, P. K. Emi1 regulates the anaphase-promoting complex by a different mechanism than Mad2 proteins. Genes Dev. 15, 3278-3285 (2001).
183. Frye, J. J. et al. Electron microscopy structure of human APC/C(CDH1)-EMI1 reveals multimodal mechanism of E3 ligase shutdown. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 827-835 (2013).
184. Liu, J. & Maller, J. L. Calcium elevation at fertilization coordinates phosphorylation of XErp1/Emi2 by Plx1 and CaMK II to release metaphase arrest by cytostatic factor. Curr. Biol. 15, 1458-1468 (2005).
185. Rauh, N. R., Schmidt, A., Bormann, J., Nigg, E. A. & Mayer, T. U. Calcium triggers exit from meiosis II by targeting the APC/C inhibitor XErp1 for degradation. Nature 437, 1048-1052 (2005).
186. Tung, J. J. et al. A role for the anaphase-promoting complex inhibitor Emi2/XErp1, a homolog of early mitotic inhibitor 1, in cytostatic factor arrest of Xenopus eggs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4318-4323 (2005).
187. Tischer, T., Hormanseder, E. & Mayer, T. U. The APC/C inhibitor XErp1/Emi2 is essential for Xenopus early embryonic divisions. Science 338, 520-524 (2012).
188. Wang, W. & Kirschner, M. W. Emi1 preferentially inhibits ubiquitin chain elongation by the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature Cell Biol. 15, 797-806 (2013).
189. Ohe, M. et al. Emi2 inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome absolutely requires Emi2 binding via the C-terminal RL tail. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 905-913 (2010).
190. Sako, K. et al. Emi2 mediates meiotic MII arrest by competitively inhibiting the binding of Ube2S to the APC/C. Nature Commun. 5, 3667 (2014).
191. Machida, Y. J. & Dutta, A. The APC/C inhibitor, Emi1, is essential for prevention of rereplication. Genes Dev. 21, 184-194 (2007).
192. Di Fiore, B. & Pines, J. Emi1 is needed to couple DNA replication with mitosis but does not regulate activation of the mitotic APC/C. J. Cell Biol. 177, 425-437 (2007).
193. Guardavaccaro, D. et al. Control of meiotic and mitotic progression by the F box protein α-Trcp1 in vivo. Dev. Cell 4, 799-812 (2003).
194. Margottin-Goguet, F. et al. Prophase destruction of Emi1 by the SCF(?TrCP/Slimb) ubiquitin ligase activates the anaphase promoting complex to allow progression beyond prometaphase. Dev. Cell 4, 813-826 (2003).
195. Hansen, D. V., Loktev, A. V., Ban, K. H. & Jackson, P. K. Plk1 regulates activation of the anaphase promoting complex by phosphorylating and triggering SCF?TrCP-dependent destruction of the APC Inhibitor Emi1. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 5623-5634 (2004).
196. Moshe, Y., Boulaire, J., Pagano, M. & Hershko, A. Role of Polo-like kinase in the degradation of early mitotic inhibitor 1, a regulator of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 7937-7942 (2004).
197. Sumara, I. et al. Roles of polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Curr. Biol. 14, 1712-1722 (2004).
198. van Vugt, M. A. et al. Polo-like kinase-1 is required for bipolar spindle formation but is dispensable for anaphase promoting complex/Cdc20 activation and initiation of cytokinesis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 36841-36854 (2004).
199. Moshe, Y., BarOn, O., Ganoth, D. & Hershko, A. Regulation of the action of early mitotic inhibitor 1 on the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome by cyclin-dependent kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 16647-16657 (2011).
200. Zhang, Z., Kulkarni, K., Hanrahan, S. J., Thompson, A. J. & Barford, D. The APC/C subunit Cdc16/Cut9 is a contiguous tetratricopeptide repeat superhelix with a homo-dimer interface similar to Cdc27. EMBO J. 29, 3733-3744 (2010).