Insights into the anaphase-promoting complex: A molecular machine that regulates mitosis

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-9

  Chang, Leifu ^a   Barford, David ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; CYCLINE; EMI1 PROTEIN; F BOX PROTEIN; SECURIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; FBXO5 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

CATALYSIS; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME REGULATION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HUMAN; MITOSIS RATE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MITOTIC RECOMBINATION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS REGULATION; REVIEW; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; UBIQUITINATION; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING;

ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEX-CYCLOSOME; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; F-BOX PROTEINS; HUMANS; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; MITOSIS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOLYSIS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84906515478     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.08.003     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Sullivan M., Morgan D.O. Finishing mitosis, one step at a time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8:894-903.
2. Barford D. Structural insights into anaphase-promoting complex function and mechanism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011, 366:3605-3624.
3. Pines J. Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the apc/c. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:427-438.
4. Primorac I., Musacchio A. Panta rhei: the apc/c at steady state. J Cell Biol 2013, 201:177-189.
5. Meyer H.J., Rape M. Processive ubiquitin chain formation by the anaphase-promoting complex. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011, 22:544-550.
6. Barford D., Takagi Y., Schultz P., Berger I. Baculovirus expression: tackling the complexity challenge. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013, 23:357-364.
7. Chang L., Zhang Z., Yang J., McLaughlin S.H., Barford D. Molecular architecture and mechanism of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 2014, 10.1038/nature13543.
8. Schreiber A., Stengel F., Zhang Z., Enchev R.I., Kong E.H., Morris E.P., Robinson C.V., da Fonseca P.C., Barford D. Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 2011, 470:227-232.
9. Zhang Z., Yang J., Kong E.H., Chao W.C., Morris E.P., da Fonseca P.C., Barford D. Recombinant expression, reconstitution and structure of human anaphase-promoting complex (apc/c). Biochem J 2013, 449:365-371.
10. Uzunova K., Dye B.T., Schutz H., Ladurner R., Petzold G., Toyoda Y., Jarvis M.A., Brown N.G., Poser I., Novatchkova M., et al. Apc15 mediates cdc20 autoubiquitylation by apc/c(mcc) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012, 19:1116-1123.
11. Scheres S.H. Relion: implementation of a bayesian approach to cryo-em structure determination. J Struct Biol 2012, 180:519-530.
12. Kuhlbrandt W. Biochemistry. The resolution revolution. Science 2014, 343:1443-1444.
13. Dube P., Herzog F., Gieffers C., Sander B., Riedel D., Muller S.A., Engel A., Peters J.M., Stark H. Localization of the coactivator cdh1 and the cullin subunit apc2 in a cryo-electron microscopy model of vertebrate apc/c. Mol Cell 2005, 20:867-879.
14. Passmore L.A., Booth C.R., Venien-Bryan C., Ludtke S.J., Fioretto C., Johnson L.N., Chiu W., Barford D. Structural analysis of the anaphase-promoting complex reveals multiple active sites and insights into polyubiquitylation. Mol Cell 2005, 20:855-866.
15. Ohi M.D., Feoktistova A., Ren L., Yip C., Cheng Y., Chen J.S., Yoon H.J., Wall J.S., Huang Z., Penczek P.A., et al. Structural organization of the anaphase-promoting complex bound to the mitotic activator slp1. Mol Cell 2007, 28:871-885.
16. Herzog F., Primorac I., Dube P., Lenart P., Sander B., Mechtler K., Stark H., Peters J.M. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 2009, 323:1477-1481.
17. da Fonseca P.C., Kong E.H., Zhang Z., Schreiber A., Williams M.A., Morris E.P., Barford D. Structures of apc/c(cdh1) with substrates identify cdh1 and apc10 as the d-box co-receptor. Nature 2011, 470:274-278.
18. Buschhorn B.A., Petzold G., Galova M., Dube P., Kraft C., Herzog F., Stark H., Peters J.M. Substrate binding on the apc/c occurs between the coactivator cdh1 and the processivity factor doc1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18:6-13.
19. He J., Kulkarni K., da Fonseca P.C., Krutauz D., Glickman M.H., Barford D., Morris E.P. The structure of the 26s proteasome subunit rpn2 reveals its pc repeat domain as a closed toroid of two concentric alpha-helical rings. Structure 2012, 20:513-521.
20. He J., Chao W.C., Zhang Z., Yang J., Cronin N., Barford D. Insights into degron recognition by apc/c coactivators from the structure of an acm1-cdh1 complex. Mol Cell 2013, 50:649-660.
21. Glotzer M., Murray A.W., Kirschner M.W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 1991, 349:132-138.
22. Pfleger C.M., Kirschner M.W. The ken box: an apc recognition signal distinct from the d box targeted by cdh1. Genes Dev 2000, 14:655-665.
23. Chao W.C., Kulkarni K., Zhang Z., Kong E.H., Barford D. Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 2012, 484:208-213.
24. Tian W., Li B., Warrington R., Tomchick D.R., Yu H., Luo X. Structural analysis of human cdc20 supports multisite degron recognition by apc/c. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:18419-18424.
25. Carroll C.W., Enquist-Newman M., Morgan D.O. The apc subunit doc1 promotes recognition of the substrate destruction box. Curr Biol 2005, 15:11-18.
26. Hellmuth S., Bottger F., Pan C., Mann M., Stemmann O. Pp2a delays apc/c-dependent degradation of separase-associated but not free securin. EMBO J 2014, 33:1134-1147.
27. Holt L.J., Krutchinsky A.N., Morgan D.O. Positive feedback sharpens the anaphase switch. Nature 2008, 454:353-357.
28. Mailand N., Diffley J.F. Cdks promote DNA replication origin licensing in human cells by protecting cdc6 from apc/c-dependent proteolysis. Cell 2005, 122:915-926.
29. Singh S.A., Winter D., Kirchner M., Chauhan R., Ahmed S., Ozlu N., Tzur A., Steen J.A., Steen H. Co-regulation proteomics reveals substrates and mechanisms of apc/c-dependent degradation. EMBO J 2014, 33:385-399.
30. Burton J.L., Xiong Y., Solomon M.J. Mechanisms of pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase promoting complex by acm1. EMBO J 2011, 30:1818-1829.
31. Enquist-Newman M., Sullivan M., Morgan D.O. Modulation of the mitotic regulatory network by apc-dependent destruction of the cdh1 inhibitor acm1. Mol Cell 2008, 30:437-446.
32. Sedgwick G.G., Hayward D.G., Di Fiore B., Pardo M., Yu L., Pines J., Nilsson J. Mechanisms controlling the temporal degradation of nek2a and kif18a by the apc/c-cdc20 complex. EMBO J 2013, 32:303-314.
33. Song L., Craney A., Rape M. Microtubule-dependent regulation of mitotic protein degradation. Mol Cell 2014, 53:179-192.
34. Kimata Y., Baxter J.E., Fry A.M., Yamano H. A role for the fizzy/cdc20 family of proteins in activation of the apc/c distinct from substrate recruitment. Mol Cell 2008, 32:576-583.
35. Schwab M., Neutzner M., Mocker D., Seufert W. Yeast hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase apc. EMBO J 2001, 20:5165-5175.
36. Van Voorhis V.A., Morgan D. Activation of the apc/c ubiquitin ligase by enhanced e2 efficiency. Curr Biol 2014, 24:1556-1562.
37. Rodrigo-Brenni M.C., Morgan D.O. Sequential e2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on apc targets. Cell 2007, 130:127-139.
38. Wang W., Kirschner M.W. Emi1 preferentially inhibits ubiquitin chain elongation by the anaphase-promoting complex. Nat Cell Biol 2013, 15:797-806.
39. Wickliffe K.E., Lorenz S., Wemmer D.E., Kuriyan J., Rape M. The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit e2. Cell 2011, 144:769-781.
40. Williamson A., Wickliffe K.E., Mellone B.G., Song L., Karpen G.H., Rape M. Identification of a physiological e2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:18213-18218.
41. Wu T., Merbl Y., Huo Y., Gallop J.L., Tzur A., Kirschner M.W. Ube2s drives elongation of k11-linked ubiquitin chains by the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:1355-1360.
42. Jin L., Williamson A., Banerjee S., Philipp I., Rape M. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell 2008, 133:653-665.
43. Rodrigo-Brenni M.C., Foster S.A., Morgan D.O. Catalysis of lysine 48-specific ubiquitin chain assembly by residues in e2 and ubiquitin. Mol Cell 2010, 39:548-559.
44. Williamson A., Banerjee S., Zhu X., Philipp I., Iavarone A.T., Rape M. Regulation of ubiquitin chain initiation to control the timing of substrate degradation. Mol Cell 2011, 42:744-757.
45. Meyer H.J., Rape M. Enhanced protein degradation by branched ubiquitin chains. Cell 2014, 157:910-921.
46. Dimova N.V., Hathaway N.A., Lee B.H., Kirkpatrick D.S., Berkowitz M.L., Gygi S.P., Finley D., King R.W. Apc/c-mediated multiple monoubiquitylation provides an alternative degradation signal for cyclin b1. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:168-176.
47. Lara-Gonzalez P., Westhorpe F.G., Taylor S.S. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2012, 22:R966-R980.
48. Luo X., Tang Z., Rizo J., Yu H. The mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either mad1 or cdc20. Mol Cell 2002, 9:59-71.
49. Sironi L., Mapelli M., Knapp S., De Antoni A., Jeang K.T., Musacchio A. Crystal structure of the tetrameric mad1-mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J 2002, 21:2496-2506.
50. Burton J.L., Solomon M.J. Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of apccdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev 2007, 21:655-667.
51. King E.M., van der Sar S.J., Hardwick K.G. Mad3 ken boxes mediate both cdc20 and mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PloS One 2007, 2:e342.
52. Sczaniecka M., Feoktistova A., May K.M., Chen J.S., Blyth J., Gould K.L., Hardwick K.G. The spindle checkpoint functions of mad3 and mad2 depend on a mad3 ken box-mediated interaction with cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (apc/c). J Biol Chem 2008, 283:23039-23047.
53. Lara-Gonzalez P., Scott M.I., Diez M., Sen O., Taylor S.S. Bubr1 blocks substrate recruitment to the apc/c in a ken-box-dependent manner. J Cell Sci 2011, 124:4332-4345.
54. De Antoni A., Pearson C.G., Cimini D., Canman J.C., Sala V., Nezi L., Mapelli M., Sironi L., Faretta M., Salmon E.D., Musacchio A. The mad1/mad2 complex as a template for mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2005, 15:214-225.
55. Izawa D., Pines J. Mad2 and the apc/c compete for the same site on cdc20 to ensure proper chromosome segregation. J Cell Biol 2012, 199:27-37.
56. Zhang Y., Lees E. Identification of an overlapping binding domain on cdc20 for mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21:5190-5199.
57. Lau D.T., Murray A.W. Mad2 and mad3 cooperate to arrest budding yeast in mitosis. Curr Biol 2012, 22:180-190.
58. Mansfeld J., Collin P., Collins M.O., Choudhary J.S., Pines J. Apc15 drives the turnover of mcc-cdc20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment. Nat Cell Biol 2011, 13:1234-1243.
59. Foster S.A., Morgan D.O. The apc/c subunit mnd2/apc15 promotes cdc20 autoubiquitination and spindle assembly checkpoint inactivation. Mol Cell 2012, 47:921-932.
60. Habu T., Kim S.H., Weinstein J., Matsumoto T. Identification of a mad2-binding protein, cmt2, and its role in mitosis. EMBO J 2002, 21:6419-6428.
61. Yang M., Li B., Tomchick D.R., Machius M., Rizo J., Yu H., Luo X. P31comet blocks mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 2007, 131:744-755.
62. Miller J.J., Summers M.K., Hansen D.V., Nachury M.V., Lehman N.L., Loktev A., Jackson P.K. Emi1 stably binds and inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor. Genes Dev 2006, 20:2410-2420.
63. Frye J.J., Brown N.G., Petzold G., Watson E.R., Grace C.R., Nourse A., Jarvis M.A., Kriwacki R.W., Peters J.M., Stark H., Schulman B.A. Electron microscopy structure of human apc/c(cdh1)-emi1 reveals multimodal mechanism of e3 ligase shutdown. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013, 20:827-835.
64. Listovsky T., Sale J.E. Sequestration of cdh1 by mad2l2 prevents premature apc/c activation prior to anaphase onset. J Cell Biol 2013, 203:87-100.