Insights into degron recognition by APC/C coactivators from the structure of an Acm1-Cdh1 complex

Molecular Cell

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 649-660

  He, Jun ^a   Chao, William C H ^a   Zhang, Ziguo ^a   Yang, Jing ^a   Cronin, Nora ^a   Barford, David ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACM1 PROTEIN; ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UVOMORULIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE COMPLEXES;

EID: 84878881252     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.04.024     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adams P.D., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Hung L.W., Ioerger T.R., McCoy A.J., Moriarty N.W., Read R.J., Sacchettini J.C., Sauter N.K., Terwilliger T.C. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2002, 58:1948-1954.
2. Araki M., Yu H., Asano M. A novel motif governs APC-dependent degradation of Drosophila ORC1 invivo. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:2458-2465.
3. Bailey T.L., Boden M., Buske F.A., Frith M., Grant C.E., Clementi L., Ren J., Li W.W., Noble W.S. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37(Web Server issue):W202-W208.
4. Barford D. Structural insights into anaphase-promoting complex function and mechanism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366:3605-3624.
5. Berger I., Fitzgerald D.J., Richmond T.J. Baculovirus expression system for heterologous multiprotein complexes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22:1583-1587.
6. Bitinaite J., Rubino M., Varma K.H., Schildkraut I., Vaisvila R., Vaiskunaite R. USER friendly DNA engineering and cloning method by uracil excision. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:1992-2002.
7. Burke J.R., Hura G.L., Rubin S.M. Structures of inactive retinoblastoma protein reveal multiple mechanisms for cell cycle control. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1156-1166.
8. Burton J.L., Solomon M.J. Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:655-667.
9. Burton J.L., Xiong Y., Solomon M.J. Mechanisms of pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase promoting complex by Acm1. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1818-1829.
10. Carroll C.W., Enquist-Newman M., Morgan D.O. The APC subunit Doc1 promotes recognition of the substrate destruction box. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:11-18.
11. Castro A., Vigneron S., Bernis C., Labbé J.C., Lorca T. Xkid is degraded in a D-box, KEN-box, and A-box-independent pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:4126-4138.
12. Chao W.C., Kulkarni K., Zhang Z., Kong E.H., Barford D. Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 2012, 484:208-213.
13. Choi E., Dial J.M., Jeong D.E., Hall M.C. Unique D box and KEN box sequences limit ubiquitination of Acm1 and promote pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex. J.Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:23701-23710.
14. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1994, 50:760-763. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4.
15. Cromer L., Heyman J., Touati S., Harashima H., Araou E., Girard C., Horlow C., Wassmann K., Schnittger A., De Veylder L., Mercier R. OSD1 promotes meiotic progression via APC/C inhibition and forms a regulatory network with TDM and CYCA1;2/TAM. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002865.
16. da Fonseca P.C., Kong E.H., Zhang Z., Schreiber A., Williams M.A., Morris E.P., Barford D. Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor. Nature 2011, 470:274-278.
17. Davis I.W., Leaver-Fay A., Chen V.B., Block J.N., Kapral G.J., Wang X., Murray L.W., Arendall W.B., Snoeyink J., Richardson J.S., Richardson D.C. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35(Web Server issue):W375-W383.
18. Dial J.M., Petrotchenko E.V., Borchers C.H. Inhibition of APCCdh1 activity by Cdh1/Acm1/Bmh1 ternary complex formation. J.Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:5237-5248.
19. Emsley P., Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004, 60:2126-2132.
20. Enquist-Newman M., Sullivan M., Morgan D.O. Modulation of the mitotic regulatory network by APC-dependent destruction of the Cdh1 inhibitor Acm1. Mol. Cell 2008, 30:437-446.
21. Evans P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006, 62:72-82.
22. Foe I.T., Foster S.A., Cheung S.K., DeLuca S.Z., Morgan D.O., Toczyski D.P. Ubiquitination of Cdc20 by the APC occurs through an intramolecular mechanism. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1870-1877.
23. Glotzer M., Murray A.W., Kirschner M.W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 1991, 349:132-138.
24. Hall M.C., Jeong D.E., Henderson J.T., Choi E., Bremmer S.C., Iliuk A.B., Charbonneau H. Cdc28 and Cdc14 control stability of the anaphase-promoting complex inhibitor Acm1. J.Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:10396-10407.
25. Herzog F., Primorac I., Dube P., Lenart P., Sander B., Mechtler K., Stark H., Peters J.M. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 2009, 323:1477-1481.
26. Hildebrandt E.R., Hoyt M.A. Cell cycle-dependent degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle motor Cin8p requires APC(Cdh1) and a bipartite destruction sequence. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12:3402-3416.
27. Hilioti Z., Chung Y.S., Mochizuki Y., Hardy C.F., Cohen-Fix O. The anaphase inhibitor Pds1 binds to the APC/C-associated protein Cdc20 in a destruction box-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:1347-1352.
28. Kabsch W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66:125-132.
29. Karamysheva Z., Diaz-Martinez L.A., Crow S.E., Li B., Yu H. Multiple anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome degrons mediate the degradation of human Sgo1. J.Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:1772-1780.
30. Kim S., Yu H. Mutual regulation between the spindle checkpoint and APC/C. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22:551-558.
31. Kimata Y., Baxter J.E., Fry A.M., Yamano H. A role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 family of proteins in activation of the APC/C distinct from substrate recruitment. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:576-583.
32. Kimata Y., Trickey M., Izawa D., Gannon J., Yamamoto M., Yamano H. A mutual inhibition between APC/C and its substrate Mes1 required for meiotic progression in fission yeast. Dev. Cell 2008, 14:446-454.
33. King R.W., Glotzer M., Kirschner M.W. Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates. Mol. Biol. Cell 1996, 7:1343-1357.
34. King E.M., van der Sar S.J., Hardwick K.G. Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e342.
35. Konarev P.V., Volkov V.V., Sokolova A.V., Koch M.H.J., Svergun D.I. PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis. J.Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36:1277-1282.
36. Kraft C., Vodermaier H.C., Maurer-Stroh S., Eisenhaber F., Peters J.M. The WD40 propeller domain of Cdh1 functions as a destruction box receptor for APC/C substrates. Mol. Cell 2005, 18:543-553.
37. Labit H., Fujimitsu K., Bayin N.S., Takaki T., Gannon J., Yamano H. Dephosphorylation of Cdc20 is required for its C-box-dependent activation of the APC/C. EMBO J. 2012, 31:3351-3362.
38. Malureanu L.A., Jeganathan K.B., Hamada M., Wasilewski L., Davenport J., van Deursen J.M. BubR1N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:118-131.
39. Martinez J.S., Jeong D.E., Choi E., Billings B.M., Hall M.C. Acm1 is a negative regulator of the CDH1-dependent anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:9162-9176.
40. Martinez J.S., Hall H., Bartolowits M.D., Hall M.C. Acm1 contributes to nuclear positioning by inhibiting Cdh1-substrate interactions. Cell Cycle 2012, 11:384-394.
41. McCoy A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Adams P.D., Winn M.D., Storoni L.C., Read R.J. Phaser crystallographic software. J.Appl. Cryst. 2007, 40:658-674.
42. Miller J.J., Summers M.K., Hansen D.V., Nachury M.V., Lehman N.L., Loktev A., Jackson P.K. Emi1 stably binds and inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:2410-2420.
43. Murshudov G.N., Skubák P., Lebedev A.A., Pannu N.S., Steiner R.A., Nicholls R.A., Winn M.D., Long F., Vagin A.A. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2011, 67:355-367.
44. Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:379-393.
45. Ostapenko D., Burton J.L., Wang R., Solomon M.J. Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:4653-4664.
46. Passmore L.A., McCormack E.A., Au S.W., Paul A., Willison K.R., Harper J.W., Barford D. Doc1 mediates the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex by contributing to substrate recognition. EMBO J. 2003, 22:786-796.
47. Passmore L.A., Barford D., Harper J.W. Purification and assay of the budding yeast anaphase-promoting complex. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 398:195-219.
48. Peters J.M. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:644-656.
49. Pfleger C.M., Kirschner M.W. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:655-665.
50. Pines J. Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:427-438.
51. Schneidman-Duhovny D., Hammel M., Sali A. FoXS: a web server for rapid computation and fitting of SAXS profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38(Web Server issue):W540-W544.
52. Schreiber A., Stengel F., Zhang Z., Enchev R.I., Kong E.H., Morris E.P., Robinson C.V., da Fonseca P.C., Barford D. Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 2011, 470:227-232.
53. Schuck P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys. J. 2000, 78:1606-1619.
54. Sczaniecka M., Feoktistova A., May K.M., Chen J.S., Blyth J., Gould K.L., Hardwick K.G. The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J.Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:23039-23047.
55. Sullivan M., Morgan D.O. A novel destruction sequence targets the meiotic regulator Spo13 for anaphase-promoting complex-dependent degradation in anaphase I. J.Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:19710-19715.
56. Svergun D.I. Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. J.Appl. Crystallogr. 1992, 25:495-503.
57. Thornton B.R., Toczyski D.P. Precise destruction: an emerging picture of the APC. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:3069-3078.
58. Tian W., Li B., Warrington R., Tomchick D.R., Yu H., Luo X. Structural analysis of human Cdc20 supports multisite degron recognition by APC/C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:18419-18424.
59. Zhang Z., Yang J., Kong E.H., Chao W.C., Morris E.P., da Fonseca P.C., Barford D. Recombinant expression, reconstitution and structure of human anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). Biochem. J. 2013, 449:365-371.