Processive ubiquitin chain formation by the anaphase-promoting complex

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 544-550

  Meyer, Hermann Josef ^a   Rape, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anapahase promoting complex; APC c; Processivity; Ube2c; Ube2s; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; FUNGAL ENZYME; UBIQUITIN;

CELL CYCLE REGULATION; ENZYME DEGRADATION; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HUMAN; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 80054750354     PISSN: 10849521     EISSN: 10963634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.03.009     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78:477-513.
2. Chau V., et al. A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science 1989, 243(4898):1576-1583.
3. Thrower J.S., et al. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J 2000, 19(1):94-102.
4. Jin L., et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell 2008, 133(4):653-665.
5. Rodrigo-Brenni M.C., Morgan D.O. Sequential E2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on APC targets. Cell 2007, 130(1):127-139.
6. Schulman B.A., Harper J.W. Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: the apex for downstream signalling pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10(5):319-331.
7. Ye Y., Rape M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10(11):755-764.
8. Deshaies R.J., Joazeiro C.A. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78:399-434.
9. Rotin D., Kumar S. Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10(6):398-409.
10. Wickliffe K., et al. The multiple layers of ubiquitin-dependent cell cycle control. Chem Rev 2009, 109(4):1537-1548.
11. Peters J.M. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7(9):644-656.
12. Zou H., et al. Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 1999, 285(5426):418-422.
13. Stewart S., Fang G. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome controls the stability of TPX2 during mitotic exit. Mol Cell Biol 2005, 25(23):10516-10527.
14. Zhao W.M., Fang G. Anillin is a substrate of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) that controls spatial contractility of myosin during late cytokinesis. J Biol Chem 2005, 280(39):33516-33524.
15. Rape M., Kirschner M.W. Autonomous regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex couples mitosis to S-phase entry. Nature 2004, 432(7017):588-595.
16. Williamson A., et al. Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106(43):18213-18218.
17. Matsumoto M.L., et al. K11-linked polyubiquitination in cell cycle control revealed by a K11 linkage-specific antibody. Mol Cell 2010, 39(3):477-484.
18. Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8(5):379-393.
19. Geley S., et al. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2001, 153(1):137-148.
20. Hayes M.J., et al. Early mitotic degradation of Nek2A depends on Cdc20-independent interaction with the APC/C. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8(6):607-614.
21. Cohen-Fix O., et al. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev 1996, 10(24):3081-3093.
22. Clute P., Pines J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nat Cell Biol 1999, 1(2):82-87.
23. Visintin R., Prinz S., Amon A. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 1997, 278(5337):460-463.
24. Pfleger C.M., Kirschner M.W. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev 2000, 14(6):655-665.
25. Schwab M., et al. Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. EMBO J 2001, 20(18):5165-5175.
26. Rape M., Reddy S.K., Kirschner M.W. The processivity of multiubiquitination by the APC determines the order of substrate degradation. Cell 2006, 124(1):89-103.
27. Chu S., et al. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 1998, 282(5389):699-705.
28. Seufert W., Jentsch S. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UBC4 and UBC5 mediate selective degradation of short-lived and abnormal proteins. EMBO J 1990, 9(2):543-550.
29. Townsley F.M., Ruderman J.V. Functional analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae UBC11 gene. Yeast 1998, 14(8):747-757.
30. Rodrigo-Brenni M.C., Foster S.A., Morgan D.O. Catalysis of lysine 48-specific ubiquitin chain assembly by residues in E2 and ubiquitin. Mol Cell 2010, 39(4):548-559.
31. Petroski M.D., Deshaies R.J. Mechanism of lysine 48-linked ubiquitin-chain synthesis by the cullin-RING ubiquitin-ligase complex SCF-Cdc34. Cell 2005, 123(6):1107-1120.
32. Osaka F., et al. A ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in fission yeast that is essential for the onset of anaphase in mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 1997, 17(6):3388-3397.
33. Seino H., et al. Two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, UbcP1/Ubc4 and UbcP4/Ubc11, have distinct functions for ubiquitination of mitotic cyclin. Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23(10):3497-3505.
34. Aristarkhov A., et al. E2-C, a cyclin-selective ubiquitin carrier protein required for the destruction of mitotic cyclins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93(9):4294-4299.
35. Yu H., et al. Identification of a novel ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme involved in mitotic cyclin degradation. Curr Biol 1996, 6(4):455-466.
36. Mathe E., et al. The E2-C vihar is required for the correct spatiotemporal proteolysis of cyclin B and itself undergoes cyclical degradation. Curr Biol 2004, 14(19):1723-1733.
37. Garnett M.J., et al. UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains on APC/C substrates to promote mitotic exit. Nat Cell Biol 2009, 11(11):1363-1369.
38. Wu T., et al. UBE2S drives elongation of K11-linked ubiquitin chains by the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107(4):1355-1360.
39. Wickliffe K.E., et al. The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit E2. Cell 2011.
40. van Wijk S.J., et al. A comprehensive framework of E2-RING E3 interactions of the human ubiquitin-proteasome system. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:p295.
41. Kirkpatrick D.S., et al. Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8(7):700-710.
42. Machida Y.J., et al. Targeted comparative RNA interference analysis reveals differential requirement of genes essential for cell proliferation. Mol Biol Cell 2006, 17(11):4837-4845.
43. Townsley F.M., et al. Dominant-negative cyclin-selective ubiquitin carrier protein E2-C/UbcH10 blocks cells in metaphase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94(6):2362-2367.
44. Chen S.M., et al. Rna interference-mediated silencing of ubch10 gene inhibits colorectal cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2009.
45. Jiang L., et al. Knockdown of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C/UbcH10 expression by RNA interference inhibits glioma cell proliferation and enhances cell apoptosis in vitro. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010, 136(2):211-217.
46. Carroll C.W., Morgan D.O. The Doc1 subunit is a processivity factor for the anaphase-promoting complex. Nat Cell Biol 2002, 4(11):880-887.
47. Goldbeter A., Koshland D.E. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981, 78(11):6840-6844.
48. Carroll C.W., Enquist-Newman M., Morgan D.O. The APC subunit Doc1 promotes recognition of the substrate destruction box. Curr Biol 2005, 15(1):11-18.
49. da Fonseca P.C., et al. Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor. Nature 2011, 470(7333):274-278.
50. Burton J.L., Solomon M.J. D box and KEN box motifs in budding yeast Hsl1p are required for APC-mediated degradation and direct binding to Cdc20p and Cdh1p. Genes Dev 2001, 15(18):2381-2395.
51. Buschhorn B.A., et al. Substrate binding on the APC/C occurs between the coactivator Cdh1 and the processivity factor Doc1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18(1):6-13.
52. Kraft C., et al. The WD40 propeller domain of Cdh1 functions as a destruction box receptor for APC/C substrates. Mol Cell 2005, 18(5):543-553.
53. Wolthuis R., et al. Cdc20 and Cks direct the spindle checkpoint-independent destruction of cyclin A. Mol Cell 2008, 30(3):290-302.
54. Pierce N.W., et al. Detection of sequential polyubiquitylation on a millisecond timescale. Nature 2009, 462(7273):615-619.
55. Hamilton K.S., et al. Structure of a conjugating enzyme-ubiquitin thiolester intermediate reveals a novel role for the ubiquitin tail. Structure 2001, 9(10):897-904.
56. Pruneda J.N., et al. Ubiquitin in motion: structural studies of the E2~Ub conjugate. Biochemistry 2011.
57. Passmore L.A., et al. Structural analysis of the anaphase-promoting complex reveals multiple active sites and insights into polyubiquitylation. Mol Cell 2005, 20(6):855-866.
58. Tang X., et al. Suprafacial orientation of the SCFCdc4 dimer accommodates multiple geometries for substrate ubiquitination. Cell 2007, 129(6):1165-1176.
59. Leismann O., Lehner C.F. Drosophila securin destruction involves a D-box and a KEN-box and promotes anaphase in parallel with Cyclin A degradation. J Cell Sci 2003, 116(Pt 12):2453-2460.
60. Yamano H., et al. The role of the destruction box and its neighbouring lysine residues in cyclin B for anaphase ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in fission yeast: defining the D-box receptor. EMBO J 1998, 17(19):5670-5678.
61. Zur A., Brandeis M. Timing of APC/C substrate degradation is determined by fzy/fzr specificity of destruction boxes. EMBO J 2002, 21(17):4500-4510.
62. Yamano H., et al. Cell cycle-regulated recognition of the destruction box of cyclin B by the APC/C in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell 2004, 13(1):137-147.
63. Stewart S., Fang G. Destruction box-dependent degradation of aurora B is mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and Cdh1. Cancer Res 2005, 65(19):8730-8735.
64. Nguyen H.G., et al. Mechanism of Aurora-B degradation and its dependency on intact KEN and A-boxes: identification of an aneuploidy-promoting property. Mol Cell Biol 2005, 25(12):4977-4992.
65. Fu G., et al. D-box is required for the degradation of human Shugoshin and chromosome alignment. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007, 357(3):672-678.
66. Qi W., Yu H. KEN-box-dependent degradation of the Bub1 spindle checkpoint kinase by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. J Biol Chem 2007, 282(6):3672-3679.
67. Lindon C., Pines J. Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells. J Cell Biol 2004, 164(2):233-241.
68. Littlepage L.E., Ruderman J.V. Identification of a new APC/C recognition domain, the A box, which is required for the Cdh1-dependent destruction of the kinase Aurora-A during mitotic exit. Genes Dev 2002, 16(17):2274-2285.
69. Salazar C., Hofer T. Multisite protein phosphorylation-from molecular mechanisms to kinetic models. FEBS J 2009, 276(12):3177-3198.
70. Tang Z., et al. Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev Cell 2001, 1(2):227-237.
71. Wang Z., et al. In vivo quantitative studies of dynamic intracellular processes using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys J 2006, 91(1):343-351.
72. Hutchins J.R., et al. Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Science 2010, 328(5978):593-599.
73. Marangos P., Carroll J. Securin regulates entry into M-phase by modulating the stability of cyclin B. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10(4):445-451.
74. Gunawardena J. Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(41):14617-14622.
75. Reyes-Turcu F.E., Ventii K.H., Wilkinson K.D. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78:363-397.
76. Stegmeier F., et al. Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature 2007, 446(7138):876-881.
77. Song E.J., et al. The Prp19 complex and the Usp4Sart3 deubiquitinating enzyme control reversible ubiquitination at the spliceosome. Genes Dev 2010, 24(13):1434-1447.
78. van Leuken R.J., et al. Usp39 is essential for mitotic spindle checkpoint integrity and controls mRNA-levels of aurora B. Cell Cycle 2008, 7(17):2710-2719.
79. Joo H.Y., et al. Regulation of cell cycle progression and gene expression by H2A deubiquitination. Nature 2007, 449(7165):1068-1072.
80. Zhang D., et al. A role for the deubiquitinating enzyme USP28 in control of the DNA-damage response. Cell 2006, 126(3):529-542.
81. Huang T.T., et al. Regulation of monoubiquitinated PCNA by DUB autocleavage. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8(4):339-347.
82. Nicassio F., et al. Human USP3 is a chromatin modifier required for S phase progression and genome stability. Curr Biol 2007, 17(22):1972-1977.
83. Sowa M.E., et al. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 2009, 138(2):389-403.
84. Listovsky T., et al. Mammalian Cdh1/Fzr mediates its own degradation. EMBO J 2004, 23(7):1619-1626.
85. Mailand N., Diffley J.F. CDKs promote DNA replication origin licensing in human cells by protecting Cdc6 from APC/C-dependent proteolysis. Cell 2005, 122(6):915-926.
86. Hopfield J.J. Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1974, 71(10):4135-4139.
87. Song L., Rape M. Regulated degradation of spindle assembly factors by the anaphase-promoting complex. Mol Cell 2010, 38(3):369-382.
88. van Zon W., et al. The APC/C recruits cyclin B1-Cdk1-Cks in prometaphase before D box recognition to control mitotic exit. J Cell Biol 2010, 190(4):587-602.
89. King R.W., et al. A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell 1995, 81(2):279-288.
90. Hershko A. Affinity purification of mitotic anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome on p13Suc1. Methods Enzymol 2005, 398:170-175.
91. Patra D., Dunphy W.G. Xe-p9, a Xenopus Suc1/Cks protein, is essential for the Cdc2-dependent phosphorylation of the anaphase-promoting complex at mitosis. Genes Dev 1998, 12(16):2549-2559.
92. Shteinberg M., Hershko A. Role of Suc1 in the activation of the cyclosome by protein kinase Cdk1/cyclin B. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999, 257(1):12-18.
93. Stewart E., et al. Destruction of Xenopus cyclins A and B2, but not B1, requires binding to p34cdc2. EMBO J 1994, 13(3):584-594.
94. den Elzen N., Pines J. Cyclin A is destroyed in prometaphase and can delay chromosome alignment and anaphase. J Cell Biol 2001, 153(1):121-136.
95. Kramer E.R., et al. Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11(5):1555-1569.
96. Lukas C., et al. Accumulation of cyclin B1 requires E2F and cyclin-A-dependent rearrangement of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 1999, 401(6755):815-818.
97. Bashir T., et al. Control of the SCF(Skp2-Cks1) ubiquitin ligase by the APC/C(Cdh1) ubiquitin ligase. Nature 2004, 428(6979):190-193.
98. Visintin R., et al. The phosphatase Cdc14 triggers mitotic exit by reversal of Cdk-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Cell 1998, 2(6):709-718.
99. Jaspersen S.L., Charles J.F., Morgan D.O. Inhibitory phosphorylation of the APC regulator Hct1 is controlled by the kinase Cdc28 and the phosphatase Cdc14. Curr Biol 1999, 9(5):227-236.
100. Shou W., et al. Exit from mitosis is triggered by Tem1-dependent release of the protein phosphatase Cdc14 from nucleolar RENT complex. Cell 1999, 97(2):233-244.
101. Reimann J.D., et al. Emi1 is a mitotic regulator that interacts with Cdc20 and inhibits the anaphase promoting complex. Cell 2001, 105(5):645-655.
102. Hsu J.Y., et al. E2F-dependent accumulation of hEmi1 regulates S phase entry by inhibiting APC(Cdh1). Nat Cell Biol 2002, 4(5):358-366.
103. Song L., Rape M. Substrate-specific regulation of ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex. Cell Cycle 2011, 10(1):52-56.
104. Kalab P., et al. Analysis of a RanGTP-regulated gradient in mitotic somatic cells. Nature 2006, 440(7084):697-701.
105. Holt L.J., Krutchinsky A.N., Morgan D.O. Positive feedback sharpens the anaphase switch. Nature 2008, 454(7202):353-357.
106. Sonenberg N., Hinnebusch A.G. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 2009, 136(4):731-745.