Search strategies and evaluation in protein-protein docking: Principles, advances and challenges

Drug Discovery Today

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1081-1096

  Huang, Sheng You ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALGORITHM; BINDING SITE; CALCULATION; ENTROPY; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RECEPTOR POTENTIAL; REVIEW; TITRIMETRY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; PROCEDURES;

BINDING SITES; DRUG DISCOVERY; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84906324850     PISSN: 13596446     EISSN: 18785832     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (165)

1. G. Waksman Proteomics and Protein-Protein Interactions: Biology, Chemistry, Bioinformatics, and Drug Design 2005 Springer
2. M.G. Kann Protein interactions and disease: computational approaches to uncover the etiology of diseases Brief. Bioinform. 8 2007 333 346
3. M.R. Arkin, and J.A. Wells Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3 2004 301 317
4. J.C. Fuller et al. Predicting druggable binding sites at the protein-protein interface Drug Discov. Today 14 2009 155 161
5. S. Grosdidier, and J. Fernandez-Recio Protein-protein docking and hot-spot prediction for drug discovery Curr. Pharm. Des. 18 2012 4607 4618
6. R.J. Bienstock Computational drug design targeting protein-protein interactions Curr. Pharm. Des. 18 2012 1240 1254
7. G. Schreiber, and S.J. Fleishman Computational design of protein-protein interactions Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23 2013 903 910
8. S.-Y. Huang et al. Molecular modeling of the heterodimer of human CFTR's nucleotide-binding domains using a protein-protein docking approach J. Mol. Graph. Model. 27 2009 822 828
9. G. Zhang et al. Ion sensing in the RCK1 domain of BK channels Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 2010 18700 18705
10. H.M. Berman et al. The Protein Data Bank Nucleic Acids Res. 28 2000 235 242
11. J. Janin Protein-protein docking tested in blind predictions: the CAPRI experiment Mol. Biosyst. 6 2010 2351 2362
12. S.J. Wodak, and J. Janin Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction J. Mol. Biol. 124 1978 323 342
13. G.R. Smith, and M.J. Sternberg Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 2002 28 35
14. J.J. Gray High-resolution protein-protein docking Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16 2006 183 193
15. A.M. Bonvin Flexible protein-protein docking Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16 2006 194 200
16. N. Andrusier et al. Principles of flexible protein-protein docking Proteins 73 2008 271 289
17. M. Zacharias Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 20 2010 180 186
18. D.W. Ritchie Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 9 2008 1 15
19. S. Vajda, and D. Kozakov Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19 2009 164 170
20. S. Vajda et al. Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven Proteins 81 2013 1874 1884
21. I.H. Moal et al. Scoring functions for protein-protein interactions Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23 2013 862 867
22. I.A. Vakser Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23 2013 198 205
23. S-Y. Huang, and X. Zou Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking Int. J. Mol. Sci. 11 2010 3016 3034
24. S-Y. Huang et al. Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 2010 12899 12908
25. E. Katchalski-Katzir et al. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89 1992 2195 2199
26. H.A. Gabb et al. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information J. Mol. Biol. 272 1997 106 120
27. I.A. Vakser Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex Proteins 29 Suppl. 1 1997 226 230
28. J.G. Mandell et al. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit Protein Eng. 14 2001 105 113
29. V.A. Roberts et al. DOT2: macromolecular docking with improved biophysical models J. Comput. Chem. 34 2013 1743 1758
30. R. Chen, and Z.P. Weng Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics Proteins 47 2002 281 294
31. R. Chen, and Z. Weng A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking Proteins 51 2003 397 408
32. R. Chen et al. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein docking algorithm Proteins 52 2003 80 87
33. J. Mintseris et al. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction Proteins 69 2007 511 520
34. B.G. Pierce et al. Accelerating protein docking in ZDOCK using an advanced 3D convolution library PLoS ONE 6 2011 e24657
35. A. Heifetz et al. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking Protein Sci. 11 2002 571 587
36. D. Kozakov et al. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials Proteins 65 2006 392 406
37. C. Bajaj et al. F2Dock: fast Fourier protein-protein docking IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 8 2011 45 58
38. C. Zhang, and L. Lai SDOCK: a global protein-protein docking program using stepwise force-field potentials J. Comput. Chem. 32 2011 2598 2612
39. C. Pons et al. Cell-Dock: high-performance protein-protein docking Bioinformatics 28 2012 2394 2396
40. E. Ben-Zeev, and M. Eisenstein Weighted geometric docking: incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan Proteins 52 2003 24 27
41. L. Li et al. ASPDock: protein-protein docking algorithm using atomic solvation parameters model BMC Bioinformatics 12 2011 36
42. A. Berchanski et al. Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking Proteins 56 2004 130 142
43. A. Berchanski et al. Modeling oligomers with Cn or Dn symmetry: application to CAPRI target 10 Proteins 60 2005 202 206
44. B. Pierce et al. M-ZDOCK: a grid-based approach for Cn symmetric multimer docking Bioinformatics 21 2005 1472 1478
45. J.I. Garzon et al. FRODOCK: a new approach for fast rotational protein-protein docking Bioinformatics 25 2009 2544 2551
46. D.W. Ritchie, and G.J. Kemp Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations Proteins 39 2000 178 194
47. D.W. Ritchie et al. Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions Bioinformatics 24 2008 1865 1873
48. D.W. Ritchie, and V. Venkatraman Ultra-fast FFT protein docking on graphics processors Bioinformatics 26 2010 2398 2405
49. F. Jiang, and S.H. Kim 'Soft docking': matching of molecular surface cubes J. Mol. Biol. 219 1991 79 102
50. P.N. Palma et al. BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions Proteins 39 2000 372 384
51. G. Terashi et al. The SKE-DOCK server and human teams based on a combined method of shape complementarity and free energy estimation Proteins 69 2007 866 872
52. I.D. Kuntz et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions J. Mol. Biol. 161 1982 269 288
53. D. Duhovny et al. Efficient unbound docking of rigid molecules Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 2452 2002 185 200
54. D. Schneidman-Duhovny et al. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking Nucleic Acids Res. 33 2005 W363 W367
55. V. Venkatraman et al. Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors BMC Bioinformatics 10 2009 407
56. J. Esquivel-Rodriguez et al. Multi-LZerD: multiple protein docking for asymmetric complexes Proteins 80 2012 1818 1833
57. E.J. Gardiner et al. Protein docking using a genetic algorithm Proteins 44 2001 44 56
58. B.K. Shoichet, and I.D. Kuntz Protein docking and complementarity J. Mol. Biol. 221 1991 327 346
59. B.K. Shoichet, and I.D. Kuntz Predicting the structure of protein complexes: a step in the right direction Chem. Biol. 3 1996 151 156
60. D.M. Lorber et al. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions Protein Sci. 11 2002 1393 1408
61. J.J. Gray et al. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations J. Mol. Biol. 331 2003 281 299
62. C. Wang et al. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility J. Mol. Biol. 373 2007 503 519
63. S. Chaudhury, and J.J. Gray Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles J. Mol. Biol. 381 2008 1068 1087
64. S. Chaudhury et al. Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2 PLoS ONE 6 2011 e22477
65. M. Zacharias Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility Protein Sci. 12 2003 1271 1282
66. M. Zacharias ATTRACT: protein-protein docking in CAPRI using a reduced protein model Proteins 60 2005 252 256
67. K. Bastard et al. Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking Proteins 62 2006 956 969
68. C. Dominguez et al. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 2003 1731 1737
69. S.J. de Vries et al. HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets Proteins 69 2007 726 733
70. R. Abagyan et al. ICM: a new method for protein modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation J. Comput. Chem. 15 1994 488 506
71. J. Fernandez-Recio et al. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains Proteins 52 2003 113 117
72. I.H. Moal, and P.A. Bates SwarmDock and the use of normal modes in protein-protein docking Int. J. Mol. Sci. 11 2010 3623 3648
73. G.M. Morris et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function J. Comput. Chem. 19 1998 1639 1662
74. I. Andre et al. Emergence of symmetry in homooligomeric biological assemblies Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 2008 16148 16152
75. A. Saladin et al. PTools: an opensource molecular docking library BMC Struct. Biol. 9 2009 27
76. J. Janin et al. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions Proteins 52 2003 2 9
77. R. Mendez et al. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures Proteins 60 2005 150 169
78. M.F. Lensink et al. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition Proteins 69 2007 704 718
79. M.F. Lensink, and S.J. Wodak Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI Proteins 78 2010 3085 3095
80. M.F. Lensink, and S.J. Wodak Docking, scoring and affinity prediction in CAPRI Proteins 81 2013 2082 2095
81. G. Moont et al. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes Proteins 35 1999 364 373
82. B. Pierce, and Z. Weng ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function Proteins 67 2007 1078 1086
83. T.M. Cheng et al. pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking Proteins 68 2007 503 515
84. S. Liang et al. A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys Proteins 69 2007 244 253
85. G.Y. Chuang et al. DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking Biophys. J. 95 2008 4217 4227
86. S. Liu, and I.A. Vakser DECK: distance and environment-dependent, coarse-grained, knowledge-based potentials for protein-protein docking BMC Bioinformatics 12 2011 280
87. C. Pons et al. Scoring by intermolecular pairwise propensities of exposed residues (SIPPER): a new efficient potential for protein-protein docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 2011 370 377
88. D.V. Ravikant, and R. Elber PIE-efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein-protein docking Proteins 78 2010 400 419
89. S-Y. Huang, and X. Zou MDockPP: a hierarchical approach for protein-protein docking and its application to CAPRI rounds 15-19 Proteins 78 2010 3096 3103
90. S.-Y. Huang, and X. Zou An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition Proteins 72 2008 557 579
91. T. Vreven et al. Integrating atom-based and residue-based scoring functions for protein-protein docking Protein Sci. 20 2011 1576 1586
92. S. Schneider, and M. Zacharias Scoring optimisation of unbound protein-protein docking including protein binding site predictions J. Mol. Recognit. 25 2012 15 23
93. M. Zacharias Combining coarse-grained nonbonded and atomistic bonded interactions for protein modeling Proteins 81 2013 81 92
94. J. Andreani et al. InterEvScore: a novel coarse-grained interface scoring function using a multi-body statistical potential coupled to evolution Bioinformatics 29 2013 1742 1749
95. R.M. Jackson et al. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem J. Mol. Biol. 276 1998 265 285
96. C.J. Camacho, and D.W. Gatchell Successful discrimination of protein interactions Proteins 52 2003 92 97
97. L. Li et al. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions Proteins 53 2003 693 707
98. N. Andrusier et al. FireDock: fast interaction refinement in molecular docking Proteins 69 2007 139 159
99. E. Mashiach et al. FiberDock: flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking Proteins 78 2010 1503 1519
100. V. Venkatraman, and D.W. Ritchie Flexible protein docking refinement using pose-dependent normal mode analysis Proteins 80 2012 2262 2274
101. M. Krol et al. Implicit flexibility in protein docking: cross-docking and local refinement Proteins 69 2007 750 757
102. S. Lorenzen, and Y. Zhang Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization Protein Sci. 16 2007 2716 2725
103. S. Liang et al. Refining near-native protein-protein docking decoys by local re-sampling and energy minimization Proteins 76 2009 309 316
104. S. Viswanath et al. Improving ranking of models for protein complexes with side chain modeling and atomic potentials Proteins 81 2013 592 606
105. Y. Shen et al. Protein docking by the underestimation of free energy funnels in the space of encounter complexes PLoS Comput. Biol. 4 2008 e1000191
106. S. Omori, and A. Kitao CyClus: a fast, comprehensive cylindrical interface approximation clustering/reranking method for rigid-body protein-protein docking decoys Proteins 81 2013 1005 1016
107. R. Oliva et al. Ranking multiple docking solutions based on the conservation of inter-residue contacts Proteins 81 2013 1571 1584
108. S. Qin, and H.X. Zhou A holistic approach to protein docking Proteins 69 2007 743 749
109. S. Lorenzen, and Y. Zhang Identification of near-native structures by clustering protein docking conformations Proteins 68 2007 187 194
110. D. Kozakov et al. Discrimination of near-native structures in protein-protein docking by testing the stability of local minima Proteins 72 2008 993 1004
111. N. Kowalsman, and M. Eisenstein Combining interface core and whole interface descriptors in postscan processing of protein-protein docking models Proteins 77 2009 297 318
112. N. Kowalsman, and M. Eisenstein Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures Bioinformatics 23 2007 421 426
113. A.W. Ghoorah et al. KBDOCK 2013: a spatial classification of 3D protein domain family interactions Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gkt1199
114. L. Li et al. How to use not-always-reliable binding site information in protein-protein docking prediction PLoS ONE 8 2013 e75936
115. E. Ben-Zeev et al. Prediction of the unknown: inspiring experience with the CAPRI experiment Proteins 52 2003 41 46
116. T. Vreven et al. Exploring angular distance in protein-protein docking algorithms PLoS ONE 8 2013 e56645
117. A. Szilagyi, and Y. Zhang Template-based structure modeling of protein-protein interactions Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 24 2014 10 23
118. P.J. Kundrotas et al. Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 2012 9438 9441
119. S. Mukherjee, and Y. Zhang Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination Structure 19 2011 955 966
120. Q.C. Zhang et al. Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale Nature 490 2012 556 560
121. A. Guerler et al. Mapping monomeric threading to protein-protein structure prediction J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53 2013 717 725
122. N. Tuncbag et al. Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM Nat. Protoc. 6 2011 1341 1354
123. A.W. Ghoorah et al. Spatial clustering of protein binding sites for template based protein docking Bioinformatics 27 2011 2820 2827
124. S-Y. Huang, and X. Zou Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking Proteins 66 2007 399 421
125. M. Trellet et al. A unified conformational selection and induced fit approach to protein-peptide docking PLoS ONE 8 2013 e58769
126. M. Baaden, and S.J. Marrink Coarse-grain modelling of protein-protein interactions Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23 2013 878 886
127. N. Basdevant et al. Modeling protein-protein recognition in solution using the coarse-grained force field SCORPION J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 9 2013 803 813
128. A. Emperador et al. Efficient relaxation of protein-protein interfaces by discrete molecular dynamics simulations J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 9 2013 1222 1229
129. A. Solernou, and J. Fernandez-Recio pyDockCG: new coarse-grained potential for protein-protein docking J. Phys. Chem. B 115 2011 6032 6039
130. S.J. de Vries, and M. Zacharias ATTRACT-EM: a new method for the computational assembly of large molecular machines using Cryo-EM maps PLoS ONE 7 2012 e49733
131. T. Vreven et al. Performance of ZDOCK in CAPRI rounds 20-26 Proteins 81 2013 2175 2182
132. S. de Vries, and M. Zacharias Flexible docking and refinement with a coarse-grained protein model using ATTRACT Proteins 81 2013 2167 2174
133. R. Chen et al. A protein-protein docking benchmark Proteins 52 2003 88 91
134. J. Mintseris et al. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update Proteins 60 2005 214 216
135. H. Hwang et al. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0 Proteins 73 2008 705 709
136. H. Hwang et al. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0 Proteins 78 2010 3111 3114
137. P. Kastritis et al. A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity Protein Sci. 20 2011 482 491
138. Y. Gao et al. DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking Proteins 69 2007 845 851
139. F.P. Davis, and A. Sali PIBASE: a comprehensive database of structurally defined protein interfaces Bioinformatics 21 2005 1901 1907
140. E.D. Levy et al. 3D complex: a structural classification of protein complexes PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 2006 e155
141. D. Douguet et al. DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces Bioinformatics 22 2006 2612 2618
142. C. Winter et al. SCOPPI: a structural classification of protein-protein interfaces Nucleic Acids Res. 34 2006 D310 D314
143. S. Mintz et al. Generation and analysis of a protein-protein interface data set with similar chemical and spatial patterns of interactions Proteins 61 2005 6 20
144. P.J. Kundrotas, and E. Alexov PROTCOM: searchable database of protein complexes enhanced with domain-domain structures Nucleic Acids Res. 35 2007 D575 D579
145. I.H. Moal et al. The scoring of poses in protein-protein docking: current capabilities and future directions BMC Bioinformatics 14 2013 286
146. K. Wiehe et al. The performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in rounds 6-11 of CAPRI Proteins 69 2007 719 725
147. D. Kozakov et al. Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: ClusPro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13-19 Proteins 78 2010 3124 3130
148. E. Mashiach et al. An integrated suite of fast docking algorithms Proteins 78 2010 3197 3204
149. J.P. Rodrigues et al. Defining the limits of homology modeling in information-driven protein docking Proteins 81 2013 2119 2128
150. M. Torchala et al. A Markov-chain model description of binding funnels to enhance the ranking of docked solutions Proteins 81 2013 2143 2149
151. P.J. Kundrotas, and I.A. Vakser Global and local structural similarity in protein-protein complexes: implications for template-based docking Proteins 81 2013 2137 2142
152. D. Kozakov et al. How good is automated protein docking? Proteins 81 2013 2159 2166
153. C. Pallara et al. Expanding the frontiers of protein-protein modeling: from docking and scoring to binding affinity predictions and other challenges Proteins 81 2013 2192 2200
154. Y. Shen Improved flexible refinement of protein docking in CAPRI rounds 22-27 Proteins 81 2013 2129 2136
155. S.-Y. Huang et al. Inclusion of the orientational entropic effect and low-resolution experimental information for protein-protein docking in CAPRI Proteins 81 2013 2183 2191
156. S.R. Comeau et al. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking Nucleic Acids Res. 32 2004 W96 W99
157. S.J. de Vries et al. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking Nat. Protoc. 5 2010 883 897
158. S. Lyskov, and J.J. Gray The RosettaDock server for local protein-protein docking Nucleic Acids Res. 36 2008 W233 W238
159. A. Tovchigrechko, and I.A. Vakser GRAMM-X public web server for protein-protein docking Nucleic Acids Res. 34 2006 W310 W314
160. V.I. Lesk, and M.J. Sternberg 3D-Garden: a system for modelling protein-protein complexes based on conformational refinement of ensembles generated with the marching cubes algorithm Bioinformatics 24 2008 1137 1144
161. E. Mashiach et al. FiberDock: a web server for flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking Nucleic Acids Res. 38 2010 W457 W461
162. G. Macindoe et al. HexServer: an FFT-based protein docking server powered by graphics processors Nucleic Acids Res. 38 2010 W445 W449
163. M. Torchala et al. SwarmDock: a server for flexible protein-protein docking Bioinformatics 29 2013 807 809
164. B.G. Pierce et al. ZDOCK server: interactive docking prediction of protein-protein complexes and symmetric multimers Bioinformatics 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097
165. B. Jimenez-Garcia et al. pyDockWEB: a web server for rigid-body protein-protein docking using electrostatics and desolvation scoring Bioinformatics 29 2013 1698 1699