Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 180-186

  Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING;

EID: 77951297973     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.02.001     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Fischer H.E. Einfluß der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme. Chem Ber 1894, 27:2985-2993.
2. Koshland D.E. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1958, 17:1145-1150.
3. Tsai C.J., Kumar S., Ma B., Nussinov R. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci 1999, 8:1181-1190.
4. Gavin A.C., Bosche M., Krause R., Grandi P., Marzioch M., Bauer A., Schultz J., Rick J.M., Michon A.M., Cruciat C.M., et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002, 415:141-147.
5. Rual J.F., Venkatesan K., Hao T., Hirozane-Kishikawa T., Dricot A., Li N., Berriz G.F., Gibbons F.D., Dreze M., Ayivi-Guedehoussou N., et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2005, 437:1173-1178.
6. Janin J., Henrick K., Moult J., Eyck L.T., Sternberg M.J., Vajda S., Vasker I., Wodak S.J. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003, 52:2-9.
7. Lensink M.F., Mendez R., Wodak S.J. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins 2007, 69:704-718.
8. Bonvin A.M. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006, 16:194-200.
9. Andrusier N., Mashiach E., Nussinov R., Wolfson H.J. Principles of flexible protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008, 73:271-289.
10. Schreiber G., Haran G., Zhou H.-X. Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics. Chem Rev 2009, 1009:839-860.
11. Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C. Biomolecular diffusional association. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002, 12:204-213.
12. Halperin I., Ma B., Wolfson H., Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002, 47:409-443.
13. Vajda S., Kozakov D. Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:164-170.
14. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking using a reduced model. Protein Sci 2003, 12:1271-1282.
15. Richie D., Kozakov D., Vadja S. Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1865-1873.
16. Garzon J.I., Lopez-Blanco J.R., Pons C., Kovacs J., Abagyan R., Fernandez-Recio J., Chacon P. Frodock: a new approach for fast rotational protein-protein docking. Bioinformatics 2009, 19:2544-2551.
17. Pons C., Grosdidier S., Solernou A., Perez-Cano L., Fernandez-Recio J. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2010, 78:95-108.
18. Cheng T.M., Blundell T.L., Fernandez-Recio J. pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2007, 68:503-515.
19. Zhang Q., Sanner M., Olson A.J. Shape complementarity of protein-protein complexes at multiple resolutions. Proteins 2009, 75:453-467.
20. Audie J. Development and validation of an empirical free energy function for calculating protein-protein binding free energy surfaces. Biophys Chem 2009, 139:84-91.
21. Martin O., Schomburg D. Efficient comprehensive scoring of docked protein complexes using probabilistic support vector machines. Proteins 2008, 70:1367-1378.
22. Pierce B., Weng Z. A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance. Proteins 2008, 72:270-279.
23. Liang S., Meroueh S.O., Wang G., Qiu C., Zhou Y. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys. Proteins 2009, 75:397-403.
24. Huang S.-Y., Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition. Proteins 2008, 71:557-579.
25. Ravikant D.V.S., Elber R. PIE-efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein-protein docking. Proteins 2010, 78:400-419.
26. Chen R., Li L., Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003, 52:80-87.
27. Kowalsman N., Eisenstein M. Combining interface core and whole interface descriptors in postscan processing of protein-protein docking models. Proteins 2009, 77:297-318.
28. Totrov M., Abagyan R. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008, 18:178-184.
29. Krol M., Chaleil R.A., Tournier A.L., Bates P.A. Implicit flexibility in protein docking: cross docking and local refinement. Proteins 2007, 69:7-18.
30. Mustard D., Ritichie D.W. Docking essential dynamics eigenstructures. Proteins 2005, 60:269-274.
31. Chaudhury S., Gray J.J. Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. J Mol Biol 2008, 381:1068-1087.
32. Wang C., Bradley P., Baker D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J Mol Biol 2007, 373:503-519.
33. Dominguez C., Boelens R., Bonvin A. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical and biophysical information. J. Am Chem Soc 2003, 125:1731-1737.
34. de Vries S.J., Bonvin A.M.J.J. How proteins get in touch: interface prediction in the study of biomolecular complexes. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2008, 9:394-406.
35. Das R., Andre I., Shen Y., Wu Y., Lemak A., Bansal S., Arrowsmith C.H., Szyperski T., Baker D. Simultaneous prediction of protein folding and docking at high resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:18978-18983.
36. Sivasubramanian A., Sircar A., Chaudhury S., Gray J.J. Toward high-resolution modelling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody-antigen docking. Proteins 2009, 74:497-514.
37. Bahar I., Atilgan A.R., Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Folding Des 1997, 2:173-181.
38. Bahar I., Chennubhotla C., Tobi D. Intrinsic dynamics of enzymes in the unbound state and relation to allosteric regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006, 16:194-200.
39. Keskin O. Binding induced conformational changes of proteins correlate with their intrinsic fluctuations: a case study of antibodies. BMC Struct Biol 2007, 7:31.
40. Tobi D., Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:18908-18913.
41. Bakan A., Bahar I. The intrinsic dynamics of enzymes plays a dominant role in determining the structural changes induced upon inhibitor binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:14349-14354.
42. Dobbins S.E., Lesk V.I., Sternberg M.J.E. Insights into protein flexibility: the relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein-protein docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:10390-10395.
43. Emekli U., Schneidman-Duhovny D., Wolfson H.J., Nussionov R., Haliloglu T. HingeProt: automated prediction of hinges in protein structures. Proteins 2008, 70:1219-1227.
44. Zacharias M., Sklenar H. Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility in ligand-receptor docking simulations: application to a DNA minor groove ligand complex. J Comput Chem 1999, 20:287-300.
45. Lindahl E., Delarue M. Refinement of docked protein-ligand and protein-DNA structures using low-frequency normal mode amplitude optimization. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:4496-4506.
46. May A., Zacharias M. Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochem Biophys Acta 2005, 1754:225-231.
47. May A., Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008, 70:794-809.
48. Saladin A., Fiorucci S., Poulain P., Prévost C., Zacharias M. PTools: an opensource molecular docking library. BMC Struct Biol 2008, 9:27-38.
49. Aloy P., Russell R.B. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:5896-5901.
50. Aloy P., Ceulemans H., Stark A., Russell R.B. The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol 2003, 332:989-998.
51. Launay G., Simonson T. Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:427.
52. Kundrotas P.J., Lensink M.F., Alexov A. Homology-based modelling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. Int J Biol Macromol 2008, 43:198-208.
53. Fukuhara N., Kawabata T. Homcos: a server to predict interacting protein pairs and interacting sites by homology modelling of the complex structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:W184-W189.
54. Gunther S., May P., Hoppe A., Frommel C., Preissner R. Docking without docking: ISEARCH-prediction of interactions by multimeric threading. Proteins 2007, 69:839-844.
55. Zhu Z., Tovchigrechko A., Baronova T., Gao Y., Douget D., O'Toole N., Vasker I.A. Large-scale structural modelling of protein complexes at low resolution. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2008, 6:789-810.
56. Kundrotas P.J. Alexov A: predicting 3D structures of transient protein-protein complexes by homology. Biochem Biophys Acta 2009, 1764:1498-1511.
57. Chen H., Skolnick J. M-Tasser: an algorithm for protein quaternary structure prediction. Biophys J 2008, 94:918-928.