Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility

Protein Science

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1271-1282

  Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomolecular simulation; Docking minimization; Protein docking; Protein interaction geometry; Protein modeling; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYMES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEASE INHIBITORS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0038583687     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0239303     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ausiello, G., Cesareni, G., and Helmer-Citterich, M. 1997. A new docking procedure applied to reconstruction of protein tertiary structure. Proteins 28: 556-567.
2. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J., Meyer, E.E., Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Shianouchi, T., and Tasumi, M. 1977. The PDB: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112: 535-542.
3. Betts, M.J. and Sternberg, M.J.E. 1999. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: Implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng.12: 271-283.
4. Camacho, J.C., Weng, Z., Vajda, S., and DeLisi, C. 1999. Free energy landscapes of encounter in protein-protein association. Biophys. J. 76: 1166-1178.
5. Camacho, J.C., Gatchell, D.W., Kimura, S.R., and Vajda, S. 2000. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 40: 525-537.
6. Camacho, J.C. and Vajda, S. 2001. Protein docking along smooth association pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 10636-10641.
7. Chakrabarti, P. and Janin, J. 2002. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins 47: 334-343.
8. Chen, R. and Weng, Z. 2002. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation and electrostatics. Proteins 47: 281-294.
9. Cherfils, J. and Janin, J. 1993. Protein docking algorithms: Simulating molecular recognition. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3: 265-269.
10. Cherfils, J., Duquerroy, S., and Janin, J. 1991. Protein-protein recognition analysed by docking simulation. Proteins 11: 271-280.
11. Cherfils, J., Bizebard, T., Knossow, M., and Janin, J. 1994. Rigid-body docking with mutant constraints of influenza hemagglutinin with antibody HC19. Proteins 18: 8-18.
12. Dunbrack, R.L. 2002. Rotamer libraries in 21st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 431-440.
13. Dunbrack, R.L. and Karplus, M. 1993. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins: Application to side chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 230: 543-574.
14. Fernandez-Recio, J., Totrov, M., and Abagyan, R. 2002. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci. 11: 280-291.
15. Fischer, D., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 1995. A geometry based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol. 248: 459-477.
16. Gabb, H.A., Jackson, R.M., and Sternberg, M.J.E. 1997. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 106-120.
17. Gabdoulline, R.R. and Wade, R.C. 2001. Protein-protein association: Investigation of factors influencing association rates by Brownian dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 306: 1139-1155.
18. Gardiner, E.J., Willet, P., and Artymiuk, P.J. 2001. Protein docking using a genetic algorithm. Proteins 44: 44-56.
19. Gibbs, N., Clarke, A.R., and Sessions, R.B. 2001. Ab initio protein structure prediction using physicochemical potentials and a simplified off-lattice model. Proteins 43: 186-202.
20. Glaser, F., Steinberg, D.M., Vakser, I.A., and Ben-Tal, N. 2001. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 43: 89-102.
21. Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 2002. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 47: 409-443.
22. Helmer-Citterich, M. and Tramontano, A. 1994. Puzzle: A new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 235: 1021-1031.
23. Jackson, R. and Sternberg, M.J.E. 1995. A continuum model for protein/protein interactions: Application to the docking problem. ITLJ. Mol. Biol. 250: 258-275.
24. Jackson, R., Gabb, H.A., and Sternberg, M.J.E. 1998. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: Application to the docking problem. J. Mol. Biol. 276: 265-285.
25. Jackson, R.M. 1999. Comparison of protein-protein interactions in serine protease inhibitors and antibody-antigen complexes: Implications for the protein docking problem. Protein Sci. 8: 603-613.
26. Janin, J. 1995. Protein-protein recognition. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 64: 145-166.
27. Jiang, F. and Kim, S. 1991. Soft docking: Matching of molecular surface cubes. J. Mol. Biol. 219: 79-102.
28. Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesen, A.A., Aflalo, C., and Wodak, S.J. 1992, Molecular surface recognition: Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 2195-2199.
29. Lenhof, H.-P. 1996. An algorithm for the protein docking problem. In Bioinformatics: From nucleic acids and proteins to cell metabolism (eds. D. Schomburg and U. Lessel), pp. 125-139, GBF monographs 18th edition, Braunschweig, Germany.
30. Lo Conte, L., Chotia, C., and Janin, J. 1999. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 2177-2198.
31. Lorber, D.M. and Shoichet, B.K. 1998. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles. Protein Sci. 7: 938-950.
32. Lorber, D.M., Udo, M.K., and Shoichet, B.K. 2002. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions. Protein Sci. 11: 1393-1408.
33. Meyer, M., Wilson, P., and Schomburg, D. 1996. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface complementarity as a basis for protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 264: 199-210.
34. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R.L. 1999. Self-consistent estimation of inter-residue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins 34: 49-68.
35. Moont, G., Gabb, H.A., and Sternberg, M.J.E. 1999. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 35: 364-373.
36. Najmanovich, R., Kuttner, J., Sobolev, V., and Edelman, M. 2000. Side-chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding. Proteins 39: 261-268.
37. Norel, R., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 1994. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 34: 933-940.
38. Norel, R., Petry, D., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 1999. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins. Proteins 35: 403-419.
39. Palma, P.N., Krippahl, L., Wampler, J.E., and Moura, J.J. G. 2000. Bigger: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins 39: 372-384.
40. Ritchie, D.W. and Kemp, J.L. 2000. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 47: 334-343.
41. Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D. 1991. Protein docking and complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 221: 327-346.
42. Smith, G.R. and Sternberg, M.J.E. 2002. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 28-35.
43. Tovichigrechko, A., Wells, C.A., and Vakser, I.A. 2002. Docking protein models. Protein Sci. 11: 1888-1896.
44. Tuffery, P., Etchebest, C., Hazout, S., and Lavery, R. 1991. A new approach to the rapid determination of protein side chain conformations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 8: 1267-1289.
45. Vakser, I.A. 1997. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins Suppl. 1: 226-230
46. Wallqvist, A. and Ullner, M. 1994. A simplified amino acid potential for use in structure predictions of proteins. Proteins 18: 267-280.
47. Zacharias, M., Luty, B.A., Davis, M.E., and McCammon, J.A. 1994. Combined conformational search and finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann approach for flexible docking: Application to an operator mutation in the λ repressor-operator complex. J. Mol. Biol. 238: 455-465.