Global and local structural similarity in protein-protein complexes: Implications for template-based docking

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2137-2142

  Kundrotas, Petras J ^a   Vakser, Ilya A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Protein modeling; Protein recognition; Structural templates; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

HETERODIMER; HOMODIMER; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DOCKING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

BIOINFORMATICS; PROTEIN MODELING; PROTEIN RECOGNITION; STRUCTURAL TEMPLATES; STRUCTURE PREDICTION;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84888307602     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24392     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Wass MN, David A, Sternberg MJE. Challenges for the prediction of macromolecular interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:382-390.
2. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins 2010;78:3073-3084.
3. Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:110-116.
4. Vakser IA, Kundrotas P. Predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes. Curr Pharm Biotech 2008;9:57-66.
5. Zacharias M. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010;20:180-186.
6. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round IX. Proteins 2011;79 (Suppl 10):1-5.
7. Vakser IA. Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013;23:198-205.
8. Kundrotas PJ, Zhu Z, Janin J, Vakser IA. Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:9438-9441.
9. Russell RB, Alber F, Aloy P, Davis FP, Korkin D, Pichaud M, Topf M, Sali A. A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:313-324.
10. Lu L, Lu H, Skolnick J. MULTIPROSPECTOR: an algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions by multimeric threading. Proteins 2002;49:350-364.
11. Korkin D, Davis FP, Alber F, Luong T, Shen M, Lucic V, Kennedy MB, Sali A. Structural modeling of protein interactions by analogy: application to PSD-95. PLoS Comp Biol 2006;2:1365-1376.
12. Mukherjee S, Zhang Y. Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination. Structure 2011;13:955-966.
13. Jordan RA, EL-Manzalawy Y, Dobbs D, Honavar V. Predicting protein-protein interface residues using local surface structural similarity. BMC Bioinform 2012;13:41.
14. Konc J, Janezic D. ProBiS algorithm for detection of structurally similar protein binding sites by local structural alignment. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1160-1168.
15. Gunther S, May P, Hoppe A, Frommel C, Preissner R. Docking without docking: ISEARCH-prediction of interactions using known interfaces. Proteins 2007;69:839-844.
16. Keskin O, Nussinov R, Gursoy A. PRISM: protein-protein interaction prediction by structural matching. Methods Mol Biol 2008;484:505-521.
17. Zhang QC, Petrey D, Deng L, Qiang L, Shi Y, Thu CA, Bisikirska B, Lefebvre C, Accili D, Hunter T, Maniatis T, Califano A, Honig B. Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature 2012;490:556-560.
18. Kundrotas PJ, Lensink MF, Alexov E. Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. Int J Biol Macromol 2008;43:198-208.
19. Sinha R, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Docking by structural similarity at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2010;78:3235-3241.
20. Douguet D, Chen HC, Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2006;22:2612-2618.
21. Sinha R, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Protein docking by the interface structure similarity: how much structure is needed? PloS One 2012;7:e31349.
22. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucl Acid Res 2005;33:2302-2309.
23. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.
24. Tovchigrechko A, Wells CA, Vakser IA. Docking of protein models. Protein Sci 2002;11:1888-1896.
25. Hunjan J, Tovchigrechko A, Gao Y, Vakser IA. The size of the intermolecular energy funnel in protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2008;72:344-352.
26. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2947-2948.
27. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. Clustal-W-improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acid Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
28. Keskin O, Nussinov R. Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. Protein Eng 2005;18:11-24.
29. Keskin O, Nussinov R. Similar binding sites and different partners: implications to shared proteins in cellular pathways. Structure 2007;15:341-354.
30. Keeble AH, Joachimiak LA, Mate MJ, Meenan N, Kirkpatrick N, Baker D, Kleanthous C. Experimental and computational analyses of the energetic basis for dual recognition of immunity proteins by colicin endonucleases. J Mol Biol 2008;379:745-759.
31. Zhang QC, Petrey D, Norel R, Honig BH. Protein interface conservation across structure space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:10896-10901.