Assessment of CAPRI predictions in Rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 150-169

  Méndez, Raúl ^a,b   Leplae, Raphaël ^a   Lensink, Marc F ^a   Wodak, Shoshana J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUT DE NEUROCIÈNCIES   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

CAPRI; Conformational changes; Protein complexes; Protein docking; Protein protein interactions

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSOME; OLIGOMER;

ALGORITHM; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENZYME INHIBITOR COMPLEX; INTERNET; OLIGOMERIZATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 21644469377     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20551     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, Bader GD, Moore L, Adams SL, Millar A, Taylor P, Bennett K, Boutilier K, Yang L, Wolting C, Donaldson I, Schandorff S, Shewnarane J, Vo M, Taggart J, Goudreault M, Muskat B, Alfarano C, Dewar D, Lin Z, Michalickova K, Willems AR, Sassi H, Nielsen PA, Rasmussen KJ, Andersen JR, Johansen LE, Hansen LH, Jespersen H, Podtelejnikov A, Nielsen E, Crawford J, Poulsen V, Sorensen BD, Matthiesen J, Hendrickson RC, Gleeson F, Pawson T, Moran MF, Durocher D, Mann M, Hogue CW, Figeys D, Tyers M. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002;415:180-183.
2. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, Grandi P, Marzioch M, Bauer A, Schultz J, Rick JM, Michon AM, Cruciat CM, Remor M, Hofert C, Schelder M, Brajenovic M, Ruffner H, Merino A, Klein K, Hudak M, Dickson D, Rudi T, Gnau V, Bauch A, Bastuck S, Huhse B, Leutwein C, Heurtier MA, Copley RR, Edelmann A, Querfurth E, Rybin V, Drewes G, Raida M, Bouwmeester T, Bork P, Seraphin B, Kuster B, Neubauer G, Superti-Furga G. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002;415:141-147.
3. Claverie JM. Gene number: what if there are only 30,000 human genes? Science 2001;291:1255-1257.
4. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, Knight JR, Lockshon D, Narayan V, Srinivasan M, Pochart P, Qureshi-Emili A, Li Y, Godwin B, Conover D, Kalbfleisch T, Vijayadamodar G, Yang M, Johnston M, Fields S, Rothberg JM. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000;403:623-627.
5. Edwards AM, Kus B, Jansen R, Greenbaum D, Greenblatt J, Gerstein M. Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet 2002;18:529-536.
6. Sali A, Glaeser R, Earnest T, Baumeister W. From words to literature in structural proteomics. Nature 2003;422:216-225.
7. Chance MR, Fiser A, Sali A, Pieper U, Eswar N, Xu G, Fajardo JE, Radhakannan T, Marinkovic N. High-throughput computational and experimental techniques in structural genomics. Genome Res 2004;14:2145-2154.
8. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Assessment of progress over the CASP experiments. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):585-595.
9. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJE, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
10. Wodak SJ, Méndez R. Prediction of protein-protein interactions: the CAPRI experiment, its evaluation and implications. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:242-249.
11. Méndez R, Leplae R, De Maria L, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.
12. Janin J. The targets of CAPRI Rounds 3-5. Proteins 2005;60:170-175.
13. Takagi J, Yang Y, Liu JH, Wang JH, Springer TA. Complex between nidogen and laminin fragments reveals a paradigmatic beta-propeller interface. Nature 2003;424:969-974.
14. Terrak M, Kerff F, Langsetmo K, Tao T, Dominguez R. Structural basis of protein phosphatase 1 regulation. Nature 2004;429:780-784.
15. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
16. Vajda S. Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty. Proteins 2005;60:176-180.
17. Kraulis P. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1991;24: 946-950.
18. Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Spehner JC. Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 1996;38:305-320.
19. Merritt E, Bacon, DJ. Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:505-524.
20. McLachlan A. rapid comparison of protein structures. Acta Crystallogr 1982;A38:871-873.
21. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J Mol Biol 2004;335:843-865.
22. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
23. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005;347:1077-1101.
24. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:1731-1737.
25. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW. Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 2003;52:92-97.
26. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
27. Berchanski A, Shapira B, Eisenstein M. Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2004;56:130-142.
28. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
29. Ritchie DW. Evaluation of protein docking predictions using Hex 3.1 in CAPRI rounds 1 and 2. Proteins 2003;52:98-106.
30. Aloy P, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJE. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J Mol Biol 2001;311:395-408.
31. Li L, Chen R, Weng Z. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 2003;53:693-707.
32. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Geometry-based flexible and symmetric protein docking. Proteins 2005;60:224-231.
33. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2005. Forthcoming.
34. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003;12: 1271-1282.
35. Fano A, Carrieri A, Ritchie D. Improving the scoring of protein-protein interactions by means of surface complementarity and molecular interaction fields: the GridHex approach. Manuscript in preparation.
36. Duan Y, Reddy BV, Kaznessis YN. Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions. Protein Sci 2005;14:316-328.
37. Lee K, Czaplewski C, Kim SY, Lee J. An efficient molecular docking using conformational space annealing. J Comput Chem 2005;26:78-87.
38. Mustard D, Ritchie DW. Docking essential dynamics eigenstructures. Proteins 2005;60:269-274.
39. Bernauer J, Poupon A, Azé J, Janin J. A docking analysis of the statistical physics of protein-protein recognition. Phys Biol 2005; 2:S17-S23.
40. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL Jr. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003;12:2001-2014.
41. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 2004;383:66-93.
42. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Chivian D, Baker D. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with Rosetta. Proteins 2004;55:656-677.
43. Jaramillo A, Wodak SJ. Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models. Biophys J 2005;88:156-171.
44. Ogata K, Jaramillo A, Cohen W, Briand JP, Connan F, Choppin J, Muller S, Wodak SJ. Automatic sequence design of major histocompatibility complex class I binding peptides impairing CD8+ T cell recognition. J Biol Chem 2003;278:1281-1290.
45. Jackson RM, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJE. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285.
46. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 2003;52:113-117.
47. Totrov M, Abagyan R. Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy. Nat Struct Biol 1994;1:259-263.
48. Kopp J, Schwede T. Automated protein structure homology modeling: a progress report. Pharmacogenomics 2004;5:405-416.
49. Berchanski A, Eisenstein M. Construction of molecular assemblies via docking: modeling of tetramers with D2 symmetry. Proteins 2003;53:817-829.
50. Pierce B, Tong W, Weng Z. M-ZDOCK: a grid-based approach for Cn symmetric multimer docking. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1472-1478.
51. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential. Protein Sci 2004; 13:391-399.