Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 421-426

  Kowalsman, Noga ^a   Eisenstein, Miriam ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; GEOMETRY; INTERNET; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 33847317318     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl524     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bahadur,R.P. et al. (2004) A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol., 336, 943-955.
2. Ben-Tzvi,D. and Weizman,Z. (1996) Digital processing of pictures. The Open University of Israel, Tel Aviv.
3. Berchanski,A. et al. (2004) Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking. Proteins, 56, 130-142.
4. Blom,N.S. and Sygusch,J. (1997) High resolution fast quantitative docking using Fourier domain correlation techniques. Proteins, 27, 493-506.
5. Chakrabarti,P. and Janin,J. (2002) Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins, 47, 334-343.
6. Eisenstein,M. and Katchalski-Katzir,E. (2004) On proteins, grids, correlations, and docking. C. R. Biol., 327, 409-420.
7. Halperin,I. et al. (2002) Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins, 47, 409-443.
8. Heifetz,A. et al. (2002) Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci., 11, 571-587.
9. Honig,B. and Nicholls,A. (1995) Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science, 268, 1144-1149.
10. Hubbard,S.J. and Thornton,J.M. (1993) 'NACCESS', Computer Program. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, London.
11. Katchalski-Katzir,E. et al. (1992) Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 2195-2199.
12. Levitt,M. and Gerstein,M. (1998) A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 5913-5920.
13. Lo Conte,L. et al. (1999) The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol., 285, 2177-2198.
14. Luty,B.A. et al. (1995) A molecular mechanics grid method for evaluation of ligand-receptor interactions. J. Comput. Chem., 16, 454-464.
15. Mendez,R. et al. (2003) Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: Current status of docking methods. Proteins, 52, 51-67.
16. Mendez,R. et al. (2005) Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins, 60, 150-169.
17. Mintseris,J. et al. (2005) Protein-protein docking Benchmark 2.0: An update. Proteins, 60, 214-216.
18. Schneidman-Duhovny,D. et al. (2003) Taking geometry to its edge: Fast unbound rigid (and hinge-bent) docking. Proteins, 52, 107-112.
19. Sitkoff,D. (1994) Accurate calculation of hydration free energies using macroscopic solvent models. J. Phys. Chem., 98, 1978-1988.
20. Sternberg,M.J. et al. (1998) Predictive docking of protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8, 250-256.
21. Wu,G. et al. (2003) Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER-A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J. Comput. Chem., 24, 1549-1562.