Identification of near-native structures by clustering protein docking conformations

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 187-194

  Lorenzen, Stephan ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Docking decoy; Docking meta server; Fast fourier transformation; Protein structure clustering; Protein protein docking; TM score

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 34249912111     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21442     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
2. Chen R, Weng Z. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Proteins 2003;51:397-408.
3. Chen R, Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 2002;47:281-294.
4. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
5. Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. Development and testing of an automated approach to protein docking. Proteins 2005;60:296-301.
6. Li L, Chen R, Weng Z. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 2003;53:693-707.
7. Jackson RM, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285.
8. Mount G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 1999;35:364-373.
9. Camacho CJ, Weng Z, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association. Biophys J 1999;76:1166-1178.
10. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:11158-11162.
11. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J Comput Chem 2004;25:865-871.
12. Vakser IA. Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. Biopolymers 1996;39:455-464.
13. Vakser IA, Matar OG, Lam CF. A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8477-8482.
14. Law DS, Ten Eyck LF, Katzenelson O, Tsigelny I, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Mitchell JC. Finding needles in haystacks: Reranking DOT results by using shape complementarity, cluster analysis, and biological information. Proteins 2003;52:33-40.
15. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Kotlovyi V, Mitchell JC, Nelson E, Tsigelny I, Ten Eyck LF. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng 2001;14:105-113.
16. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW. Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 2003;52:92-97.
17. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Web Server issue):W96-W99.
18. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
19. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
20. Kozakov D, Clodfelter KH, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking. Biophys J 2005;89:867-875.
21. Fischer D. 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor. Proteins 2003;51:434-441.
22. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018.
23. Lundstrom J, Rychlewski L, Bujnicki J, Elofsson A. Peons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci 2001;10:2354-2362.
24. Camacho CJ, Ma H, Champ PC. Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions. Proteins 2006;63:868-877.
25. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91.
26. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
27. Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. GRAMM-X public web server for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34(Web Server issue):W310-W314.
28. Heifetz A, Katchalski-Katzir E, Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2002;11:571-587.
29. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
30. Kabsch W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1978;34:827-828.
31. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.