Template-based structure modeling of protein-protein interactions

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 10-23

  Szilagyi, Andras ^a   Zhang, Yang ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TEMPLATE BASED MODELING; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84890029384     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.005     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Uetz P., Giot L., Cagney G., Mansfield T.A., Judson R.S., Knight J.R., Lockshon D., Narayan V., Srinivasan M., Pochart P., et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000, 403:623-627.
2. Rain J.C., Selig L., De Reuse H., Battaglia V., Reverdy C., Simon S., Lenzen G., Petel F., Wojcik J., Schachter V., et al. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature 2001, 409:211-215.
3. Mosca R., Pons T., Ceol A., Valencia A., Aloy P. Towards a detailed atlas of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013.
4. Montelione G.T. The Protein Structure Initiative: achievements and visions for the future. F1000 Biol Rep 2012, 4:7.
5. Stein A., Mosca R., Aloy P. Three-dimensional modeling of protein interactions and complexes is going'omics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011, 21:200-208.
6. Venkatesan K., Rual J.F., Vazquez A., Stelzl U., Lemmens I., Hirozane-Kishikawa T., Hao T., Zenkner M., Xin X., Goh K.I., et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 2009, 6:83-90.
7. Stumpf M.P., Thorne T., de Silva E., Stewart R., An H.J., Lappe M., Wiuf C. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:6959-6964.
8. Yu J., Murali T., Finley R.L. Assigning confidence scores to protein-protein interactions. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 812:161-174.
9. Vajda S., Camacho C.J. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty?. Trends Biotechnol 2004, 22:110-116.
10. Moreira I.S., Fernandes P.A., Ramos M.J. Protein-protein docking dealing with the unknown. J Comput Chem 2010, 31:317-342.
11. Janin J. Protein-protein docking tested in blind predictions: the CAPRI experiment. Mol Biosyst 2010, 6:2351-2362.
12. Lensink M., Wodak S. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins 2010, 10.1002/prot.22818.
13. Chothia C., Lesk A.M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J 1986, 5:823-826.
14. Bowie J.U., Luthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991, 253:164-170.
15. Ginalski K. Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006, 16:172-177.
16. Zhang Y. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008, 18:342-348.
17. Mariani V., Kiefer F., Schmidt T., Haas J., Schwede T. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011, 79(Suppl 10):37-58.
18. Mukherjee S., Zhang Y. Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination. Structure 2011, 19:955-966.
19. Sinha R., Kundrotas P.J., Vakser I.A. Docking by structural similarity at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2010, 78:3235-3241.
20. Zhang Q.C., Petrey D., Deng L., Qiang L., Shi Y., Thu C.A., Bisikirska B., Lefebvre C., Accili D., Hunter T., et al. Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature 2012, 490:556-560.
21. Guerler A., Govindarajoo B., Zhang Y. Mapping monomeric threading to protein-protein structure prediction. J Chem Inf Model 2013, 53:717-725.
22. Kundrotas P.J., Zhu Z., Janin J., Vakser I.A. Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:9438-9441.
23. Tuncbag N., Gursoy A., Nussinov R., Keskin O. Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM. Nat Protoc 2011, 6:1341-1354.
24. Lu L., Lu H., Skolnick J. MULTIPROSPECTOR: an algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions by multimeric threading. Proteins 2002, 49:350-364.
25. Kundrotas P.J., Lensink M.F., Alexov E. Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. Int J Biol Macromol 2008, 43:198-208.
26. Singh R., Park D., Xu J., Hosur R., Berger B. Struct2Net: a web service to predict protein-protein interactions using a structure-based approach. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:W508-W515.
27. Hosur R., Xu J., Bienkowska J., Berger B. iWRAP: an interface threading approach with application to prediction of cancer-related protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 2011, 405:1295-1310.
28. Chen H., Skolnick J. M-TASSER: an algorithm for protein quaternary structure prediction. Biophys J 2008, 94:918-928.
29. Kundrotas P.J., Vakser I.A. Global and local structural similarity in protein-protein complexes: implications for template-based docking. Proteins 2013.
30. Aloy P., Bottcher B., Ceulemans H., Leutwein C., Mellwig C., Fischer S., Gavin A.C., Bork P., Superti-Furga G., Serrano L., et al. Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 2004, 303:2026-2029.
31. Wu S., Zhang Y. MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 2008, 72:547-556.
32. Skolnick J., Kihara D., Zhang Y. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR 3.0 threading algorithm. Protein 2004, 56:502-518.
33. Lu H., Lu L., Skolnick J. Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. Biophys J 2003, 84:1895-1901.
34. Zhang Y., Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:2302-2309.
35. Petrey D., Honig B. GRASP2: visualization, surface properties, and electrostatics of macromolecular structures and sequences. Methods Enzymol 2003, 374:492-509.
36. Shatsky M., Nussinov R., Wolfson H.J. A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures. Proteins 2004, 56:143-156.
37. Vakser I.A. Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013.
38. Tyagi M., Hashimoto K., Shoemaker B.A., Wuchty S., Panchenko A.R. Large-scale mapping of human protein interactome using structural complexes. EMBO Rep 2012, 13:266-271.
39. Vreven T., Hwang H., Pierce B., Weng Z. Evaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction. Brief Bioinform 2013, 10.1093/bib/bbt047.
40. Aloy P., Ceulemans H., Stark A., Russell R.B. The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol 2003, 332:989-998.
41. Rekha N., Machado S.M., Narayanan C., Krupa A., Srinivasan N. Interaction interfaces of protein domains are not topologically equivalent across families within superfamilies: implications for metabolic and signaling pathways. Proteins 2005, 58:339-353.
42. Aloy P., Pichaud M., Russell R.B. Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005, 15:15-22.
43. Liang S.D., Zhang C., Liu S., Zhou Y.Q. Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:3698-3707.
44. Aloy P., Russell R.B. InterPreTS: protein interaction prediction through tertiary structure. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:161-162.
45. Fukuhara N., Kawabata T. HOMCOS: a server to predict interacting protein pairs and interacting sites by homology modeling of complex structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:W185-W189.
46. Keskin O., Nussinov R., Gursoy A. PRISM: protein-protein interaction prediction by structural matching. Methods Mol Biol 2008, 484:505-521.
47. Hosur R., Peng J., Vinayagam A., Stelzl U., Xu J., Perrimon N., Bienkowska J., Berger B. A computational framework for boosting confidence in high-throughput protein-protein interaction datasets. Genome Biol 2012, 13:R76.
48. Aloy P., Russell R.B. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:5896-5901.
49. Fukuhara N., Go N., Kawabata T. Prediction of interacting proteins from homology-modeled complex structures using sequence and structure scores. Biophysics 2007, 3:13-26.
50. Singh R., Xu J., Berger B. Struct2net: integrating structure into protein-protein interaction prediction. Pac Symp Biocomput 2006, 403-414.
51. Aloy P., Russell R.B. Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:1317-1321.
52. Garma L., Mukherjee S., Mitra P., Zhang Y. How many protein-protein interactions types exist in nature?. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e33891.
53. Gao M., Skolnick J. Structural space of protein-protein interfaces is degenerate, close to complete, and highly connected. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:22517-22522.
54. Zhang Q.C., Petrey D., Norel R., Honig B.H. Protein interface conservation across structure space. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:10896-10901.
55. Gunther S., May P., Hoppe A., Frommel C., Preissner R. Docking without docking: ISEARCH-prediction of interactions using known interfaces. Proteins 2007, 69:839-844.
56. Winter C., Henschel A., Kim W.K., Schroeder M. SCOPPI: a structural classification of protein-protein interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:D310-D314.
57. Pulim V., Berger B., Bienkowska J. Optimal contact map alignment of protein-protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2324-2328.
58. Sinha R., Kundrotas P.J., Vakser I.A. Protein docking by the interface structure similarity: how much structure is needed?. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e93134.
59. Lasker K., Velazquez-Muriel J.A., Webb B.M., Yang Z., Ferrin T.E., Sali A. Macromolecular assembly structures by comparative modeling and electron microscopy. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 857:331-350.
60. Russel D., Lasker K., Webb B., Velazquez-Muriel J., Tjioe E., Schneidman-Duhovny D., Peterson B., Sali A. Putting the pieces together: integrative modeling platform software for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. PLoS Biol 2012, 10:e1001244.
61. Lasker K., Phillips J.L., Russel D., Velazquez-Muriel J., Schneidman-Duhovny D., Tjioe E., Webb B., Schlessinger A., Sali A. Integrative structure modeling of macromolecular assemblies from proteomics data. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:1689-1702.
62. Lasker K., Forster F., Bohn S., Walzthoeni T., Villa E., Unverdorben P., Beck F., Aebersold R., Sali A., Baumeister W. Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:1380-1387.
63. Pierce B.G., Hourai Y., Weng Z. Accelerating protein docking in ZDOCK using an advanced 3D convolution library. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e24657.
64. Hwang H., Pierce B., Mintseris J., Janin J., Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins 2008, 73:705-709.
65. Mosca R., Ceol A., Aloy P. Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks. Nat Methods 2013, 10:47-53.
66. Eswar N., Webb B., Marti-Renom M.A., Madhusudhan M.S., Eramian D., Shen M.Y., Pieper U., Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller. Curr Protoc Bioinform 2006, 5:6. Chapter 5:Unit.
67. Petrey D., Xiang Z., Tang C.L., Xie L., Gimpelev M., Mitros T., Soto C.S., Goldsmith-Fischman S., Kernytsky A., Schlessinger A., et al. Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 2003, 53(Suppl 6):430-435.
68. Roy A., Kucukural A., Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 2010, 5:725-738.
69. Lu L., Arakaki A.K., Lu H., Skolnick J. Multimeric threading-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale: application to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome. Genome Res 2003, 13:1146-1154.
70. Guven Maiorov E., Keskin O., Gursoy A., Nussinov R. The structural network of inflammation and cancer: merits and challenges. Semin Cancer Biol 2013, 23:243-251.
71. Kundrotas P.J., Alexov E. Predicting 3D structures of transient protein-protein complexes by homology. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006, 1764:1498-1511.
72. Kundrotas P.J., Zhu Z., Vakser I.A. GWIDD: a comprehensive resource for genome-wide structural modeling of protein-protein interactions. Hum Genomics 2012, 6:7.
73. Skrabanek L., Saini H.K., Bader G.D., Enright A.J. Computational prediction of protein-protein interactions. Mol Biotechnol 2008, 38:1-17.
74. Lees J.G., Heriche J.K., Morilla I., Ranea J.A., Orengo C.A. Systematic computational prediction of protein interaction networks. Phys Biol 2011, 8:035008.
75. Hue M., Riffle M., Vert J.P., Noble W.S. Large-scale prediction of protein-protein interactions from structures. BMC Bioinform 2010, 11:144.
76. Planas-Iglesias J., Bonet J., Garcia-Garcia J., Marin-Lopez M.A., Feliu E., Oliva B. Understanding protein-protein interactions using local structural features. J Mol Biol 2013, 425:1210-1224.
77. Deane C.M., Salwinski L., Xenarios I., Eisenberg D. Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol Cell Proteom 2002, 1:349-356.
78. Smialowski P., Pagel P., Wong P., Brauner B., Dunger I., Fobo G., Frishman G., Montrone C., Rattei T., Frishman D., et al. The Negatome database: a reference set of non-interacting protein pairs. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D540-D544.
79. Trabuco L.G., Betts M.J., Russell R.B. Negative protein-protein interaction datasets derived from large-scale two-hybrid experiments. Methods 2012, 58:343-348.
80. Chen X.W., Jeong J.C., Dermyer P. KUPS: constructing datasets of interacting and non-interacting protein pairs with associated attributions. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D750-D754.
81. Zhang Y., Skolnick J. The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:1029-1034.
82. Skolnick J., Zhou H.Y., Brylinski M. Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures. J Phys Chem B 2012, 116:6654-6664.
83. Kundrotas P.J., Vakser I.A., Janin J. Structural templates for modeling homodimers. Protein Sci 2013.