Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 331, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 281-299

  Gray, Jeffrey J ^a,b   Moughon, Stewart ^a   Wang, Chu ^a   Schueler Furman, Ora ^a   Kuhlman, Brian ^a   Rohl, Carol A ^a   Baker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomolecular free energy functions; Biomolecular modeling; Conformational change; Protein binding; Protein protein docking

Indexed keywords

MONOMER;

ALGORITHM; ALPHA CHAIN; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIMULATION;

EID: 0038161052     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00670-3     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Smith G.R., Sternberg M.J. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:2002;28-35.
2. Camacho C.J., Vajda S. Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:2002;36-40.
3. Halperin I., Ma B., Wolfson H., Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 47:2002;409-443.
4. Shoichet B.K., Kuntz I.D. Protein docking and complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 221:1991;327-346.
5. Katchalski-Katzir E., Shariv I., Eisenstein M., Friesem A., Aflalo C., Vakser I. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;2195-2199.
6. Gabb H.A., Jackson R.M., Sternberg M.J. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 272:1997;106-120.
7. Camacho C.J., Gatchell D.W., Kimura S.R., Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 40:2000;525-537.
8. Palma P.N., Krippahl L., Wampler J.E., Moura J.J. BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 39:2000;372-384.
9. Mandell J.G., Roberts V.A., Pique M.E., Kotlovyi V., Mitchell J.C., Nelson E., et al. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng. 14:2001;105-113.
10. Norel R., Sheinerman F., Petrey D., Honig B. Electrostatic contributions to protein-protein interactions: fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis. Protein Sci. 10:2001;2147-2161.
11. Heifetz A., Katchalski-Katzir E., Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci. 11:2002;571-587.
12. Vakser I.A., Matar O.G., Lam C.F. A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;8477-8482.
13. Jiang F., Lin W., Rao Z. SOFTDOCK: understanding of molecular recognition through a systematic docking study. Protein Eng. 15:2002;257-263.
14. Chen R., Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 47:2002;281-294.
15. Jackson R.M., Gabb H.A., Sternberg M.J. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J. Mol. Biol. 276:1998;265-285.
16. Lorber D.M., Udo M.K., Shoichet B.K. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions. Protein Sci. 11:2002;1393-1408.
17. Fernandez-Recio J., Totrov M., Abagyan R. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci. 11:2002;280-291.
18. Moult J., Fidelis K., Zemla A., Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 45:2001;2-7.
19. Bonneau R., Tsai J., Ruczinski I., Chivian D., Rohl C., Strauss C.E., Baker D. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 45:2001;119-126.
20. Simons K.T., Kooperberg C., Huang E., Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268:1997;209-225.
21. Simons K.T., Ruczinski I., Kooperberg C., Fox B.A., Bystroff C., Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 34:1999;82-95.
22. Tsai, J., Bonneau, R., Morozov, A.V., Kuhlman, B., Rohl, C.A., & Baker, D. (2003). An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet.
23. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids. Res. 28:2000;235-242.
24. Janin J., Henrick K., Moult J., Ten Eyck L., Sternberg M.J.E., Vajda S., Vakser I.A., Wodak S.J. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 52:2003;2-9.
25. Méndez R., Laplae R., de Maria L., Wodak S.J. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 52:2003;51-67.
26. Gray J.J., Moughon S.E., Kortemme T., Schueler-Furman O., Misura K.M.S., Morozov A.V., Baker D. Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 52:2003;118-122.
27. Kuhlman B., Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;10383-10388.
28. Dunbrack R.L. Jr, Cohen F.E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1661-1681.
29. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd edit. 1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Allen M.P., Tildesley D.J. Computer Simulation of Liquids. 1989;Oxford University Press, New York.
31. Lazaridis T., Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 35:1999;133-152.
32. Kortemme T., Morozov A.V., Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326:2003;1239-1259.
33. Koehl P., Delarue M. Polar and nonpolar atomic environments in the protein core: implications for folding and binding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 20:1994;264-278.
34. Ihaka R., Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5:1996;299-314.
35. Chen R., Mintseris J., Janin J., Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 52:2003;88-91.
36. Camacho C.J., Vajda S. Protein docking along smooth association pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;10636-10641.
37. Moont G., Gabb H.A., Sternberg M.J. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 35:1999;364-373.
38. Glaser F., Steinberg D.M., Vakser I.A., Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 43:2001;89-102.
39. Goh C.S., Cohen F.E. Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 324:2002;177-192.
40. Elcock A.H., McCammon J.A. Identification of protein oligomerization states by analysis of interface conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;2990-2994.
41. Neria E., Fischer S., Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105:1996;1902-1921.
42. Legrand S.M., Merz K.M. Rapid approximation to molecular-surface area via the use of boolean logic and look-up tables. J. Comput. Chem. 14:1993;349-352.
43. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A.D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 319:1986;199-203.
44. Kortemme T., Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;14116-14121.
45. Ascenzi P., Amiconi G., Menegatti E., Guarneri M., Bolognesi M., Schnebli H. Binding of the recombinant proteinase inhibitor eglin c from leech Hirudo medicinalis to human leukocyte elastase, bovine alpha-chymotrypsin and subtilisin Carlsberg: thermodynamic study. J. Enzyme Inhib. 2:1988;167-172.
46. Stites W.E. Protein-protein interactions: interface structure, binding thermodynamics, and mutational analysis. Chem. Rev. 97:1997;1233-1250.
47. Eastman J., Wilson E.J., Cerveñansky C., Rosenberry T.L. Fasciculin 2 binds to the peripheral site on acetylcholinesterase and inhibits substrate hydrolysis by slowing a step involving proton transfer during enzyme acylation. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1995;19694-19701.
48. Menegatti E., Guarneri M., Bolognesi M., Ascenzi P., Amiconi G. Binding of the bovine pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (Kazal) to bovine serine (pro)enzymes. J. Mol. Biol. 198:1987;129-132.
49. Turk B., Krizaj I., Kralj B., Dolenc I., Popovic T., Bieth J.G., Turk V. Bovine stefin C, a new member of the stefin family. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1993;7323-7329.
50. Ayala Y.M., Vindigni A., Nayal M., Spolar R.S., Record M.T. Jr, Di Cera E. Thermodynamic investigation of hirudin binding to the slow and fast forms of thrombin: evidence for folding transitions in the inhibitor and protease coupled to binding. J. Mol. Biol. 253:1995;787-798.
51. Huang M., Syed R., Stura E.A., Stone M.J., Stefanko R.S., Ruf W., et al. The mechanism of an inhibitory antibody on TF-initiated blood coagulation revealed by the crystal structures of human tissue factor, Fab 5G9 and TF.G9 complex. J. Mol. Biol. 275:1998;873-894.
52. Ward E.S., Gussow D., Griffiths A.D., Jones P.T., Winter G. Binding activities of a repertoire of single immunoglobulin variable domains secreted from Escherichia coli. Nature. 341:1989;544-546.
53. Lee C.H., Leung B., Lemmon M.A., Zheng J., Cowburn D., Kuriyan J., Saksela K. A single amino acid in the SH3 domain of Hck determines its high affinity and specificity in binding to HIV-1 Nef protein. EMBO J. 14:1995;5006-5015.
54. Davidson V.L., Graichen M.E., Jones L.H. Binding constants for a physiologic electron-transfer protein complex between methylamine dehydrogenase and amicyanin. Effects of ionic strength and bound copper on binding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1144:1993;39-45.
55. Mannherz H.G., Goody R.S., Konrad M., Nowak E. The interaction of bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease I and skeletal muscle actin. Eur. J. Biochem. 104:1980;367-379.
56. Pettigrew D.W., Meadow N.D., Roseman S., Remington S.J. Cation-promoted association of Escherichia coli phosphocarrier protein IIAGlc with regulatory target protein glycerol kinase: substitutions of a Zinc(II) ligand and implications for inducer exclusion. Biochemistry. 37:1998;4875-4883.
57. Akerstrom B., Bjorck L. A physicochemical study of protein G, a molecule with unique immunoglobulin G-binding properties. J. Biol. Chem. 261:1986;10240-10247.
58. Heitz F., Morris M.C., Fesquet D., Cavadore J.C., Doree M., Divita G. Interactions of cyclins with cyclin-dependent kinases: a common interactive mechanism. Biochemistry. 36:1997;4995-5003.
59. Romero G., Chau V., Biltonen R.L. Kinetics and thermodynamics of the interaction of elongation factor Tu with elongation factor Ts, guanine nucleotides, and aminoacyl-tRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 260:1985;6167-6174.
60. Uchida H., Banba S., Wada M., Matsumoto K., Ikeda M., Naito N., Tanaka E., Honjo M. Analysis of binding properties between 20 kDa human growth hormone (hGH) and hGH receptor (hGHR): the binding affinity for hGHR extracellular domain and mode of receptor dimerization. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 23:1999;347-353.