Scoring optimisation of unbound protein-protein docking including protein binding site predictions

Journal of Molecular Recognition

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 15-23

  Schneider, Sebastian ^a   Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

biased force field; binding site prediction; docking by energy minimisation; protein protein complex formation; protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84855256224     PISSN: 09523499     EISSN: 10991352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.1165     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ben-Zeev E, Eisenstein M,. 2003. Weighted geometric docking: incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan. Proteins 52: 24-27. (Pubitemid 36648846)
2. Chen H, Zhou HX,. 2005. Prediction of interface residues in protein-protein complexes by a consensus neural network method: Test against NMR data. Proteins 61: 21-35. (Pubitemid 41262914)
3. Cheng TM, Blundell TL, Fernandez-Recio J,. 2007. PyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 68: 503-515. (Pubitemid 46981943)
4. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AMJJ,. 2003. HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical and biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125: 1731-1738.
5. Fiorucci S, Zacharias M,. 2010. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT. Proteins 78: 3131-3139.
6. Gottschalk KE, Neuvirth H, Schreiber G,. 2004. A novel method for scoring of docked protein complexes using predicted protein-protein interaction sites Protein Eng. 17: 183-189. (Pubitemid 38477745)
7. Huang B, Schröder M,. 2008. Using protein binding site prediction to improve docking. Gene 422: 14-21.
8. Kowalsman N, Eisenstein M,. 2009. Combining interface core and whole interface descriptors in postscan processing of protein-protein docking models. Proteins 77: 297-318.
9. Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ, 2007. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3 rd Edition. Proteins 69: 704-718. (Pubitemid 350214359)
10. Liang S, Meroueh SO, Wang G, Qiu C, Zhou Y,. 2009. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys. Proteins 75: 397-403.
11. Liang S, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y,. 2006. Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acid Res. 34: 3698-3707. (Pubitemid 44400419)
12. May A, Zacharias M,. 2005. Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1754: 225-231. (Pubitemid 41797702)
13. May A, Zacharias M,. 2008. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins 70: 794-809. (Pubitemid 351161939)
14. Melquiond ASJ, Bonvin AMJJ,. 2010. Data-driven Docking: Using External Information to Spark the biomolecular Rendez-vous. In Protein-protein complexes: Analysis, Modeling and Drug Design, Zacharias M, (ed). Imperial College Press: London; 182-208.
15. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z,. 2005. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0:An update. Proteins 60: 214-216. (Pubitemid 40934889)
16. Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ,. 2009. Protein-Protein docking dealing with the unknown. J. Comput. Chem. 31: 210-222.
17. Neuvirth H, Raz R, Schreiber G,. 2004. ProMate: A Structure Based Prediction Program to Identify the Location of Protein-Protein Binding Sites. J. Mol. Biol. 338: 181-199. (Pubitemid 38429796)
18. Pierce B, Weng Z,. 2007. ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins 67: 1078-1086. (Pubitemid 46753952)
19. Pierce B, Weng Z,. 2008. A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance. Proteins 72: 270-279. (Pubitemid 351809165)
20. Pons C, Grosdidier S, Solernou A, Perez-Cano L, Fernandez-Recio J,. 2009. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins 78: 95-108.
21. Qin S, Zhou HX,. 2007. Meta-PPISP: a meta web server for protein-protein interaction site prediction. Bioninformatics 23: 3386-3387. (Pubitemid 350238893)
22. de Vries SJ, Bonvin AMJJ,. 2008. How proteins get in touch: interface prediction in the study of biomolecular complexes. Curr. Prot. Pept. Sci. 9: 394-406.
23. de Vries SJ, Bonvin AMJJ,. 2011. CPORT: A Consensus Interface Predictor and Its Performance in Prediction-Driven Docking with HADDOCK. PLoS One 6: e17695.
24. de Vries S, Melquiond AS, Kastritis PL, Karaca E, Bordogna A, van Dijk M, Rodrigues JP, Bonvin, AMJJ,. 2010. Strengths and weaknesses of data-driven docking in critical assessment of prediction of interactions. Proteins 78: 3242-3249.
25. de Vries SJ, van Dijk A, Bonvin AMJJ,. 2006. WHISCY: what information does surface conservation yield? Application of data-driven docking. Proteins 63: 479-489.
26. Zacharias M,. 2003. Protein-protein docking using a reduced model. Protein Sci. 12: 1271-1282.
27. Zacharias M,. 2010a. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16: 194-200.
28. Zacharias M,. 2010b. Scoring and refinement of predicted protein-protein complexes. In Protein-Protein Complexes: Analysis, Modeling and Drug Design, Zacharias M, (ed.). Imperial College Press: London; 236-271.
29. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y,. 2005. Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique, and clustering guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function. Proteins 60: 314-318. (Pubitemid 40934905)
30. Zhou HX, Qin S,. 2007. Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment. Bioinformatics 23: 2203-2209. (Pubitemid 47423856)