MDockPP: A hierarchical approach for protein-protein docking and its application to CAPRI rounds 15-19

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 3096-3103

  Huang, Sheng You ^a   Zou, Xiaoqin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

CAPRI experiments; Molecular docking; Protein protein interaction; Reduced model; Scoring function

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77957934483     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22797     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1978;124:323-342.
2. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
3. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-43.
4. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Predicting molecular interactions in silico: II. Protein-protein and protein-drug docking. Curr Med Chem 2004;11:91-107.
5. Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:183-193.
6. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromoleculeligand interactions. J Mol Biol 1982;161:269-288.
7. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 1991;221:327-346.
8. Lorber DM, Udo MK, Shoichet BK. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions. Protein Sci 2002;11:1393-1408.
9. Wolfson HJ, Lamdan Y. Geometric hashing: A general and efficient model-based recognition scheme. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Internation Conference on Computer Vision. Tampa, FL. 1988. pp 238-249.
10. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Patch-Dock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nuclei Acid Res 2005;33:W363-W367.
11. Bordner AJ, Gorin AA. Protein docking using surface matching and supervised machine learning. Proteins 2007;68:488-502.
12. Jiang F, Kim SH. Soft docking: matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 1991;219:79-102.
13. Palma PN, Krippahl L, Wampler JE, Moura JJ. BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins 2000;39:372-384.
14. Gardiner EJ, Willett P, Artymiuk PJ. Protein docking using a genetic algorithm. Proteins 2001;44:44-56
15. Abagyan R, Totrov M, Kuznetsov D. ICM - A new method for protein modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J Comput Chem 1994;15:488-506.
16. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
17. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003;12:1271-1282.
18. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:1731-1737.
19. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
20. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
21. Vakser IA. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutininantibody complex. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:226-230.
22. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Kotlovyi V, Mitchell JC, Nelson E, Tsigelny I, Ten Eyck LF. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng 2001;14:105-113.
23. Chen R, Weng ZP. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Proteins 2003;51:397-408.
24. Heifetz A, Katchalski-Katzir E, Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2002;11:571-587.
25. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: An FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006; 65:392-406.
26. Bonvin AM. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:194-200.
27. Huang S-Y, Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition. Proteins 2008;72: 557-579.
28. Huang S-Y, Zou X. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Proteins 2007;66:399-421.
29. Huang S-Y, Zou X. Efficient molecular docking of NMR structures: application to HIV-1 protease. Protein Sci 2007;16:43-51.
30. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Ten Eyck L, Sternberg MJE, Vajda S, Vasker I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2003;52:2-9.
31. Méndez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
32. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ, Méndez R. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins 2007;69:704-718.
33. Rost B, Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 1994;20:216-226.
34. Huang S-Y, Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials. J Comput Chem 2006;27:1865-1875.
35. Huang S-Y, Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function. J Comput Chem 2006;27:1876-1882.
36. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91
37. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 2005;60:214-216.
38. Chen R, Li L, Weng ZP. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
39. Micheelsen PO, Vévodová J, De Maria L, Ostergaard PR, Friis EP, Wilson K, Skjøt M. Structural and mutational analyses of the interaction between the barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and the subtilisin savinase reveal a novel mode of inhibition. J Mol Biol 2008;380:681-690.
40. Betzel C, Klupsch S, Papendorf G, Hastrup S, Branner S, Wilson KS. Crystal structure of the alkaline proteinase Savinase from Bacillus lentus at 1.4 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1992;223:427-445.
41. Vallée F, Kadziola A, Bourne Y, Juy M, Rodenburg KW, Svensson B, Haser R. Barley alpha-amylase bound to its endogenous protein inhibitor BASI: crystal structure of the complex at 1.9 A resolution. Structure 1998;6:649-659.
42. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
43. Georgieva DN, Stoeva S, Voelter W, Genov N, Betzel C. Differences in the specificities of the highly alkalophilic proteinases Savinase and Esperase imposed by changes in the rigidity and geometry of the substrate binding sites. Arch Biochem Biophys 2001;387:197- 201.
44. Bøsager BC, Nielsen PK, Abou Hachem M, Fukuda K, Præorius-Ibba M, Svensson B. 2005. Mutational analysis of target enzyme recognition of the b-trefoil fold barley aamylase/subtilisin inhibitor. J Biol Chem 2005;280:14855-14864.
45. Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B. Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:7432-7437.
46. Soto CS, Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Forrest L, Honig B. Loop modeling: sampling, filtering and scoring. Proteins 2008;70:834-843.
47. Das K, Acton T, Chiang Y, Shih L, Arnold E, Montelione GT. Crystal structure of RlmAI: implications for understanding the 23S rRNA G745/G748-methylation at the macrolide antibiotic-binding site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:4041-4046.
48. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart A, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:291-325.
49. Najmudin S, Pinheiro BA, Prates JAM, Romao MJ, Fontes CMGA. Putting an N-terminal end to the Clostridium thermocellum xylanase Xyn10b story: Crystallographic structure of the CBM22-1-GH10 modules complexed with xylohexaose, submitted.
50. Forouhar F, Hussain M, Farid R, Benach J, Abashidze M, Edstrom WC, Vorobiev SM, Xiao R, Acton TB, Fu Z, Kim JJ, Miziorko HM, Montelione GT, Hunt JF. Crystal structures of two bacterial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA lyases suggest a common catalytic mechanism among a family of TIM barrel metalloenzymes cleaving carbon-carbon bonds. J Biol Chem 2006;281:7533-7545.
51. Isabet T, Montagnac G, Regazzoni K, Raynal B, El Khadali F, England P, Franco M, Chavrier P, Houdusse A, Ménétrey J. The structural basis of Arf effector specificity: the crystal structure of ARF6 in a complex with JIP4. EMBO J 2009;28:2835-2845
52. O'Neal CJ, Jobling MG, Holmes RK, Hol WG. Structural basis for the activation of cholera toxin by human ARF6-GTP. Science 2005;309:1093-1096.
53. O'shea EK, Klemm JD, Kim PS, Alber T. X-ray structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper, a two-stranded, parallel coiled coil. Science 1991;254:539-544.
54. Shen L, Tong Y, Tempel W, MacKenzie F, Arrowsmith CH, Edwards AM, Bountra C, Weigelt J, Bochkarev A, Park H. Crystal structure of full length centaurin alpha-1 bound with the FHA domain of KIF13B, submitted.
55. Venkateswarlu K, Hanada T, Chishti AH. Centaurin-alpha1 interacts directly with kinesin motor protein KIF13B. J Cell Sci 2005;118:2471-2484.
56. Bao R, Zhou ZC, Jiang C, Lin SX, Chi CW, Chen Y. The ternary structure of double-headed arrowhead protease inhibitor API-A complexed with two trypsins reveals a novel reactive site conformation. J Biol Chem 2009;284:26676-26684
57. Katz BA, Finer-Moore J, Mortezaei R, Rich DH, Stroud RM. Episelection: novel Ki approximately nanomolar inhibitors of serine proteases selected by binding or chemistry on an enzyme surface. Biochemistry 1995;34:8264-8280.
58. Blow DM, Janin J, Sweet RM. Mode of action of soybean trypsin inhibitor (Kunitz) as a model for specific protein-protein interactions. Nature 1974;249:54-57.
59. Huber R, Kukla D, Bode W, Schwager P, Bartels K, Deisenhofer J, Steigemann W. Structure of the complex formed by bovine trypsin and bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. II. Crystallographic refinement at 1.9 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1974;89:73-101.
60. Meenan NAG, Sharma A, Fleishman SJ, MacDonald C, Morel B, Boetzel R, Moore GR, Baker D, Kleanthous C. The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high affinity protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:10080-10085.
61. Kühlmann UC, Pommer AJ, Moore GR, James R, Kleanthous C. Specificity in protein-protein interactions: the structural basis for dual recognition in endonuclease colicin-immunity protein complexes. J Mol Biol 2000;301:1163-1178.
62. Krachler AM, Sharma A, Kleanthous C. Self-association of TPR domains: Lessons learned from a designed, consensus-based TPR oligomer. Proteins 2010;78:2131-2143.
63. Main ER, Xiong Y, Cocco MJ, D'Andrea L, Regan L. Design of stable alpha-helical arrays from an idealized TPR motif. Structure 2003;11:497-508.