A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 244-253

  Liang, Shide ^a,b,c   Liu, Song ^a   Zhang, Chi ^a,c   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding affinity; Docking decoys; Energy score functions; Knowledge based potential; Reference state

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; EMPIRICISM; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 34548811419     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21498     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Camacho CJ, Vajda S. Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:36-40.
2. Vajda S, Vakser I, Sternberg M, Janin J. Modeling of protein interactions in genomes. Proteins 2002;47:444-446.
3. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
4. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
5. Janin J, Seraphin B. Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:383-388.
6. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJE, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
7. Mendez R, Leplae R, Maria LD, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.
8. Brooijmans N, Kuntz ID. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu Rev Biophys Struct 2003;32:335-373.
9. Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Trends Biotech 2004;22:110-116.
10. Mendez R, Leplaea R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
11. Janin J. Assessing predictions of protein-protein interaction: the CAPRI experiment. Protein Sci 2005;14:278-283.
12. Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:183-193.
13. Bonvin AM. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:194-200.
14. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
15. Weiner SJ, Kollman P, Nguyen D, Case D. An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids. J Comput Chem 1986;7:230-252.
16. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11225-11236.
17. Scott WRP, Hünenberger PH, Tironi IG, Mark AE, Billeter SR, Fennen J, Torda AE, Huber T, Krüger P, vanGunsteren WF. The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package. J Phys Chem A 1999;103:3596-3607.
18. Taylor JS, Burnett RM. DARWIN: a program for docking flexible molecules. Proteins 2000;41:173-191.
19. Eyck LT, Mandell J, Roberts V, Pique M. Surveying molecular interactions with dot. Supercomputing '95, IEEE Press 1995.
20. Ritchie D, Kemp G. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 2000;39:178-194.
21. Fitzjohn P, Bates P. Guided docking: first step to locate potential binding sites. Proteins 2003;52:28-32.
22. Komatsu K, Kurihara Y, Iwadate M, Takeda-Shitaka M, Umeyama H. Evaluation of the third solvent clusters fitting procedure for the prediction of protein-protein interactions based on the results at the CAPRI blind docking study. Proteins 2003;52:15-18.
23. Camacho C, Vajda S. Protein docking along smooth association pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10636-10641.
24. Wodak S, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1978;123:323-342.
25. Cherfils J, Duquerroy S, Janin J. Protein-protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation. Proteins 1991;11:271-280.
26. Li C, Ma X, Chen W, Wang C. A soft docking algorithm for predicting the structure of antibody-antigen complexes. Proteins 2003;52:47-50.
27. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci 2002;11:280-291.
28. Norel R, Petrey D, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins. Proteins 1999;35:403-419.
29. Norel R, Sheinerman F, Petrey D, Honig B. Electrostatics contributions to protein-protein interactions: fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis. Protein Sci 2001;10:2147-2161.
30. Vakser I. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins 1997;29(Suppl 1):226-230.
31. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
32. Jackson R, Gabb H, Sternberg ME. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285.
33. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and and empirical binding free energy function. J Comp Chem 1998;19:1639-1662.
34. Duncan B, Olson A. Applications of evolutionary programming for the prediction of protein-protein interactions. Evolutionary programming V Proceedings of the 5th annual conference on evolutionary programming. Boston, MA: MIT Press; 1996.
35. Gardiner E, Willett P, Artymiuk P. Protein docking using a genetic algorithm. Proteins 1997;44:44-56.
36. Heifetz A, Eisenstein M. Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Protein Eng 2003;16:179-185.
37. Ben-Zeev E, Eisenstein M. Weighted geometric docking: Incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan. Proteins 2003;52:24-27.
38. Palma P, Krippahl L, Wampler J, Moura J. Bigger: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins 2000;39:372-384.
39. Lorber D, Udo M, Shoichet B. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions. Protein Sci 2002;11:1393-1408.
40. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
41. Gray J, Moughan S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl C, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid body displacement and side chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
42. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette J, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
43. Robert C, Janin J. A soft, mean field potential derived from crystal contacts for predicting protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 1998;283:1037-1047.
44. Moont G, Gabb H, Sternberg M. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 1999;35:364-373.
45. Ponstingl H, Henrick K, Thornton J. Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins. 2000;41:47-57.
46. Glaser F, Sternberg DM, Vakser I, Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2001;43:89-102.
47. Lu H, Lu L, Skolnick J. Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. Biophys. J 2003;84:1895-1901.
48. Murphy J, Gatchell D, Prasad J, Vajda S. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2003;53:840-854.
49. Liu S, Zhang C, Zhou H, Zhou Y. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins 2004;56:93-101.
50. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Baker D. Progress in protein-protein docking: Atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2005;60:187-194.
51. Wiehe K, Pierce B, Mintseris J, Tong WW, Anderson R, Chen R, Weng Z. ZDOCK and RDOCK performance in CAPRI rounds 3, 4, and 5. Proteins 2005;60:207-213.
52. Inbar Y, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Halperin I, Oron A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Approaching the CAPRI challenge with an efficient geometry-based docking. Proteins 2005;60:217-223.
53. Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. Development and testing of an automated approach to protein docking. Proteins 2005;60:296-301.
54. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique and clusterization guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function. Proteins 2005;60:314-318.
55. Jackson RM, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285.
56. Lorber DM, Udo MK, Shoichet BK. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions. Protein Sci. 2002;11:1393-1408.
57. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci 2002;11:280-291.
58. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
59. Li L, Chen R, Weng Z. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 2003;53:693-707.
60. Kowalsman N, Eisenstein M. Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures. Bioinformatics 2007;23:421-426.
61. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91.
62. Liang S, Grishin N. Effective scoring function for protein sequence design. Proteins 2004;54:271-281.
63. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999;35:133-152.
64. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10383-10388.
65. Liang S, Grishin NV. Side-chain modelling with an optimized scoring functions. Protein Sci 2002;11:322-331.
66. Dunbrack RJ, Cohen F. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci 1997;6:1661-1681.
67. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 1999;285:1735-1747.
68. Zou X, Sun Y, Kuntz ID. Inclusion of solvation in ligand binding free energy calculations using the generalized-born model. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:8033-8043.
69. Conte LL, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
70. Brooijmans N, Sharp K, Kuntz I. Stability of macromolecular complexes. Proteins 2002;48:645-653.
71. Gray JJ, Moughan SE, Kortemme T, Schueler-Furman O, Misura KMS, Morozov AV, Baker D. Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2003;52:118-122.