Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 956-969

  Bastard, Karine ^a   Prévost, Chantal ^a   Zacharias, Martin ^b  

^a INST DE BIOLOGIE PHYSICO CHIMIQUE   (France)

^b JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Docking minimization; Flexible protein protein docking; Loop flexibility; Mean field theory; Reduced protein models

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

BINDING SITES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ENZYMES; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 33644843079     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20770     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Janin J, Sepharin B. Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2003;13:383-388.
2. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJE, Vajda S, Vakser I, et al. CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
3. Mendez R, Leplae R, Maria LD, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.
4. Chen R, Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 2002;47:281-294.
5. Gray JJ, Moughon SE, Kortemme T, Schueler-Furman O, Misura KM, Morozov AV, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
6. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
7. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci 2002;11:280-291.
8. Palma PN, Kriippahl L, Wampler JE, Moura JJG. BIGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins 2000;39:372-384.
9. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Kotlovyi V, Mitchell JC, Nelson E, Tsigelny I, et al. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng 2001;14:105-113.
10. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
11. Gardiner EJ, Willett P, Artymiuk PJ. Protein docking using a genetic algorithm. Proteins 2001;44:44-56.
12. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-110.
13. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91.
14. Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:110-116.
15. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW. Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 2003;52:92-97.
16. Law DS, Eyck LFT, Katzenelson O, Tsigelny I, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Mitchell JC. Finding needles in haystacks: reranking DOT results by using shape complementarity, cluster analysis, and biological information. Proteins 2003;52:33-40.
17. Conte LL, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
18. Fetrow JS. Omega loops: nonregular secondary structures significant in protein function and stability. FASEB J 1995;9:708-717.
19. Betts MJ, Sternberg MJE. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng 1999;12:271-283.
20. Joseph D, Petsko GA, Karplus M. Anatomy of a conformational change: hinged "lid" motion of the triosephosphate isomerase loop. Science 1990;249:1425-1428.
21. Sun YJ, Rose J, Wang BC, Hsiao CD. The structure of glutamine-binding protein complexed with glutamine at 1.94 Å resolution: comparisons with other amino acid binding proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;278:219-229.
22. Gerstein M, Chothia C. Analysis of protein loop closure, two types of hinges produce one motion in lactate dehydrogenase. J Mol Biol 1991;220:133-149.
23. Derreumaux P, Schlick T. The loop opening/closing motion of the enzyme triosephosphate isomerase. Biophys J 1999;74:72-81.
24. Fitzgerald MM, Musah RA, McRee DE, Goodin DB. A ligand-gated, hinged loop rearrangement opens a channel to a buried artificial protein cavity. Nat Struct Biol 1996;3:626-631.
25. Jeffrey PD, Russo AA, Polyak K, Gibbs E, Hurwitz J, Massague J, Pavletich NP. Mechanism of CDK activation revealed by the structure of a cyclinA-CDK2 complex. Nature 1995;376:313-320.
26. Kempner ES. Movable lobes and flexible loops in proteins. Structural deformations that control biochemical activity. FEBS Lett 1993;326:4-10.
27. Hecht HJ, Szardenings M, Collins J, Schomburg D. Three-dimensional structure of the complexes between bovine chymotrypsinogen A and two recombinant variants of human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (Kazal-type). J Mol Biol 1991;220:711-722.
28. Rossjohn J, Raja SM, Nelson KL, Feil SC, vander Goot FG, Parker MW, Buckley JT. Movement of a loop in domain 3 of aerolysin is required for channel formation. Biochemistry 1998;37:741-746.
29. Kojima S, Furukubo S, Kumagai I, Miura K. Effects of deletion in the flexible loop of the protease inhibitor SSI (Streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor) on interactions with proteases. Protein Eng 1993;6:297-303.
30. Goh CS, Milburn D, Gerstein M. Conformational changes associated with protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:104-109.
31. Koshland DE. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1958;44:98-106.
32. Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Ma B, Nussinov R. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci 1999;8:1181-1190.
33. James LC, Roversi P, Tawfik DS. Antibody multispecificity mediated by conformational diversity. Science 2003;299:1362-1367.
34. Zacharias M. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP. Proteins 2004;54:759-767.
35. Tatsumi R, Fukunishi Y, Nakamura H. A hybrid method of molecular dynamics and harmonic dynamics for docking of flexible ligand to flexible receptor. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1995-2005.
36. Balsera MA, Wriggers W, Oono Y, Schulten K. Principal component analysis and long time protein dynamics. J Phys Chem 1996;100:2567-2572.
37. Dominguez C, Bonvin AM, Winkler GS, van Schaik FM, Timmers HT, Boelens R. Structural model of the UbcH5B/CNOT4 complex revealed by combining NMR, mutagenesis, and docking approaches. Structure (Camb) 2004;12:633-644.
38. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005;347:1077-1101.
39. Grunberg R, Leckner J, Nilges M. Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. Structure (Camb) 2004;12: 2125-2136.
40. Claussen H, Buning C, Rarey M, Lengauer T. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. J Mol Biol 2001;308:377-395.
41. Zavodszky MI, Lei M, Thorpe MF, Day AR, Kuhn LA. Modeling correlated main-chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition. Proteins 2004;57:243-261.
42. Cavasotto CN, Abagyan RA. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. J Mol Biol 2004;337:209-225.
43. Bastard K, Thureau A, Lavery R, Prévost C. Docking macromolecules with flexible segments. J Comput Chem 2003;24:1910-1920.
44. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003;12: 1271-1282.
45. Koehl P, Delarue M. Mean-field minimization methods for biological macromolecules. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:222-226.
46. Elber R, Karplus M. Enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics: use of the time-dependant hartree approximation for a simulation of carbon monoxide diffusion through myoglobin. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:9161-9175.
47. Koehl P, Delarue M. Application of a self-consitent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J Mol Biol 1994;239:249-275.
48. Koehl P, Delarue M. A self consistent mean field approach to simultaneous gap closure and side-chain positioning in homology modelling. Nat Struct Biol 1995;2:163-170.
49. Zheng Q, Rosenfeld R, DeLisi C, Kyle DJ. Multiple copy sampling in protein loop modeling: computational efficiency and sensitivity to dihedral angle perturbations. Protein Sci 1994;3:493-506.
50. Lafontaine I, Lavery R. Optimisation of nucleic acid sequence. Biophys J 2000;79:680-685.
51. Paillard G, Lavery R. Analyzing protein-DNA recognition mechanisms. Structure (Camb) 2004;12:113-122.
52. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJ, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
53. Sokal RR, Michener CD. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 1958;38:1409-1438.
54. Wade RC, Davis ME, Luty BA, Madura JD, McCammon JA. Gating of the active site of triose phosphate isomerase: Brownian dynamics simulations of flexible peptide loops in the enzyme. Biophys J 1993;64:9-15.
55. Williams JC, McDermott AE. Dynamics of the flexible loop of triosephosphate isomerase: the loop motion is not ligand gated. Biochemistry 1995;34:8309-8319.
56. Falzone CJ, Wright PE, Benkovic SJ. Dynamics of a flexible loop in dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli and its implication for catalysis. Biochemistry 1994;33:439-442.
57. Battiste JL, Li R, Woodward C. A highly destabilizing mutation, g37a, of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor retains the average native conformation but greatly increases local flexibility. Biochemistry 2002;41:2237-2245.
58. Kovacs JA, Chacon P, Abagyan R. Predictions of protein flexibility: first order measures. Proteins 2004;56:661-668.
59. Zacharias M, Sklenar H. Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility ligand-receptor docking simulations: application to a DNA minor groove ligand complex. J Comput Chem 1999;20:287-300.
60. Jacobs DJ, Rader AJ, Kuhn LA, Thorpe MF. Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory. Proteins 2001;44:150-165.
61. Cortes J, Simeon T, Remaud-Simeon M, Tran V. Geometric algorithms for the conformational analysis of long protein loops. J Comput Chem 2004;25:956-967.
62. Bradley P, Chivian D, Meiler J, Misura KM, Rohl CA, Schief WR, Wedemeyer WJ, et al. Rosetta predictions in CASP5: successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation. Proteins 2003; Suppl 6:457-468.
63. Ehrlich LP, Nilges M, Wade RC. The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking. Proteins 2005;58:126-133.
64. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
65. D'Alfonso G, Tramontano A, Lahm A. Structural conservation in single-domain proteins: implications for homology modeling. J Struct Biol 2001;134:246-256.
66. Rodriguez R, Chinea G, Lopez N, Pons T, Vriend G. Homology modeling, model and software evaluation: three related resources. Bioinformatics 1998;14:523-528.