Spatial clustering of protein binding sites for template based protein docking

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 20, 2011, Pages 2820-2827

  Ghoorah, Anisah W ^a   Devignes, Marie Dominique ^b   Smaïl Tabbone, Malika ^c   Ritchie, David W ^a  

^a LORIA   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

BINDING SITES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING;

EID: 80053947029     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr493     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aloy, P. et al. (2003) The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 332, 989-998.
2. Aloy, P. et al. (2005) Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 15, 15-22.
3. Aung, Z. et al. (2008) PPiClust: efficient clustering of 3D protein-protein interaction interfaces. J. Bioinformatics Comput. Biol., 6, 415-433.
4. Aytuna, A.S. et al. (2005) Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics, 21, 2850-2855.
5. Berman, H.M. et al. (2002) The protein data bank. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 58, 899-907.
6. Chakrabarti, P. and Janin, J. (2002) Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 47, 334-343.
7. Chen, H. and Skolnick, J. (2008) M-TASSER: an algorithm for protein quaternary structure prediction. Biophys. J., 94, 918-928.
8. Chen, Y.C. et al. (2007) 3D-partner: aweb server to infer interacting partners and binding models. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W561-W567.
9. Chothia, C. and Lesk, A.M. (1986) The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J., 5, 823-826.
10. Cuff, A.L. et al. (2009) The CATH classification revisited-architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D310-D314.
11. Davis, F.P. and Sali, A. (2005) PIBASE: a comprehensive database of structurally defined protein interfaces. Bioinformatics, 21, 1901-1907.
12. Ezkurdia, L. et al. (2009) Progress and challenges in predicting protein-protein interaction sites. Brief. Bioinformatics, 10, 233-246.
13. Finn, R.D. et al. (2010) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D211-D222.
14. Gao, M. and Skolnick, J. (2010) iAlign: amethod for the structural comparison of proteinprotein interfaces. Bioinformatics, 26, 2259-2265.
15. Gunther, S. et al. (2007) Docking without docking: ISEARCH - prediction of interactions using known interfaces. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformatics, 69, 839-844.
16. Higurashi, M. et al. (2009) PiSite: a database of protein interaction sites using multiple binding states in the PDB. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D360-D364.
17. Holm, L. and Sander, C. (1998) Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections. Bioinformatics, 14, 423-429.
18. Hwang, H. et al. (2010) Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformatics, 78, 3111-3114.
19. Janin, J. and Rodier, F. (1995) Protein-protein interaction at crystal contacts. Proteins, 23, 580-587.
20. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure -patternrecognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
21. Keskin, O. and Nussinov, R. (2007) Similar binding sites and different partners: implications to shared proteins in cellular pathways. Structure, 15, 341-354.
22. Keskin, O. et al. (2004) A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of proteinprotein interfaces and its implications. Protein Sci., 13, 1043-1055.
23. Keskin, O. et al. (2005) Hot regions in protein-protein interactions: the organization and contribution of structurally conserved hot spot residues. J. Mol. Biol., 345, 1281-1294.
24. Kim, W.K. et al. (2006) The many faces of protein-protein interactions: a compendium of interface geometry. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, 1151-1164.
25. Korkin, D. et al. (2005) Localization of protein-binding sites within families of proteins. Protein Sci., 14, 2350-2360.
26. Korkin, D. et al. (2006) Structural modeling of protein interactions by analogy: application to PSD-95. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, e153.
27. Kundrotas, P.J. and Alexov, E. (2006) Predicting 3D structures of transient proteinprotein complexes by homology. BBA Proteins Proteomics, 1764, 1498-1511.
28. Kundrotas, P.J. and Alexov, E. (2007) PROTCOM: searchable database of protein complexes enhanced with domain-domain structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D575-D579.
29. Kundrotas, P.J. and Vakser, I.A. (2010) Accuracy of protein-protein binding sites in highthroughput template-based modeling. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000727.
30. Kundrotas, P.J. et al. (2008) Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of proteinprotein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 43, 198-208.
31. Kundrotas, P.J. et al. (2010) GWIDD: genome-wide protein docking database. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D513-D517.
32. Launay, G. and Simonson, T. (2008) Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 427.
33. Lensink, M.F. andWodak, S.J. (2010) Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformatics, 78, 3073-3084.
34. Levy, E.D. et al. (2006) 3D complex: a structural classification of protein complexes. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, 1395-1406.
35. Lichtarge, O. et al. (1996) An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol., 257, 342-358.
36. Mendez, R. et al. (2005) Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformatics, 60, 150-169.
37. Mintseris, J. et al. (2005) Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformatics, 60, 214-216.
38. Mosca, R. et al. (2009) Pushing structural information into the yeast interactome by high-throughput protein docking experiments. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000490.
39. Murzin, A.G. et al. (1995) SCOP - a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
40. Ritchie, D.W. (2008) Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. Curr. Protein Peptide Sci., 9, 1-15.
41. Ritchie, D.W. and Kemp, G.J.L. (2000) Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 39, 178-194.
42. Shoemaker, B.A. et al. (2006) Finding biologically relevant protein domain interactions: conserved binding mode analysis. Protein Sci., 15, 352-361.
43. Shoemaker, B.A. et al. (2010) Inferred biomolecular interaction server-a web server to analyze and predict protein interacting partners and binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D518-D524.
44. Shulman-Peleg, A. et al. (2004) Protein-protein interfaces: Recognition of similar spatial and chemical organizations. Proc. Algorithms Bioinformatics, 3240, 194-205.
45. Sinha, R. et al. (2008). Docking by structural similarity at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformatics, 78, 3235-3241.
46. Stein, A. et al. (2009) 3did update: domain-domain and peptide-mediated interactions of known 3D structure. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D300-D304.
47. Stein, A. et al. (2010) 3did: identification and classification of domain-based interactions of known three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D718-D723.
48. Stein, A. et al. (2011) Three-dimensional modeling of protein interactions and complexes is going 'omics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 21, 200-208.
49. Teyra, J. et al. (2006) SCOWLP: a web-based database for detailed characterization and visualization of protein interfaces. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 104.
50. Tuncbag, N. et al. (2009) A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces. Brief. Bioinformatics, 10, 217-232.
51. van Dijk, A.D. et al. (2005) Data-driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes. FEBS J., 272, 293-312.
52. Ward, J.H. (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 58, 236-244.
53. Wass, M.N. et al. (2011) Towards the prediction of protein interaction partners using physical docking. Mol. Syst. Biol., 7, 469.
54. Winter, C. et al. (2006) SCOPPI: a structural classification of protein-protein interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D310-D314.
55. Zvelebil, M.J. et al. (1987) Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol., 195, 957-961.