Sampling and scoring: A marriage made in heaven

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1874-1884

  Vajda, Sandor ^a   Hall, David R ^a   Kozakov, Dima ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

CAPRI docking experiment; Conformational search; Molecular interaction; Molecular mechanics; Monte Carlo method; Protein protein docking; Scoring function; Structure refinement; Structure based potential

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM;

CAPRI DOCKING EXPERIMENT; CONFORMATIONAL SEARCH; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING; SCORING FUNCTION; STRUCTURE REFINEMENT; STRUCTURE-BASED POTENTIAL;

ALGORITHMS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84885074179     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24343     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Ritchie DW. Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2008;9:1-15.
2. Andrusier N, Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Principles of flexible protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008;73:271-289.
3. Vajda S, Kozakov D. Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009;19:164-170.
4. Feng JA, Marshall GR. SKATE: a docking program that decouples systematic sampling from scoring. J Comput Chem 2010;31:2540-2554.
5. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
6. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins 2010;78:3073-3084.
7. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258:367-392.
8. Samudrala R, Levitt M. Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2000;9:1399-1401.
9. Felts AK, Gallicchio E, Wallqvist A, Levy RM. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model. Proteins 2002;48:404-422.
10. Seok C, Rosen JB, Chodera JD, Dill KA. MOPED: method for optimizing physical energy parameters using decoys. J Comput Chem 2003;24:89-97.
11. Yang JS, Chen WW, Skolnick J, Shakhnovich EI. All-atom ab initio folding of a diverse set of proteins. Structure 2007;15:53-63.
12. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 2004;383:66-93.
13. Tsai J, Bonneau R, Morozov AV, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003;53:76-87.
14. John B, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3982-3992.
15. Zhang J, Zhang Y. A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction. PLoS One 2010;5:e15386.
16. Jacobson MP, Pincus DL, Rapp CS, Day TJ, Honig B, Shaw DE, Friesner RA. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 2004;55:351-367.
17. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 1991;221:327-346.
18. Vakser IA. Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. Biopolymers 1996;39:455-464.
19. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW, Kimura SR, Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2000;40:525-537.
20. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
21. Sternberg MJ, Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Moont G. Protein-protein docking. Generation and filtering of complexes. Methods Mol Biol 2000;143:399-415.
22. Murphy J, Gatchell DW, Prasad JC, Vajda S. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2003;53:840-854.
23. Liu S, Gao Y, Vakser IA. DOCKGROUND protein-protein docking decoy set. Bioinformatics 2008;24:2634-2635.
24. Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. GRAMM-X public web server for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W310-W314.
25. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91.
26. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 2005;60:214-216.
27. Hwang H, Pierce B, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins 2008;73:705-709.
28. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010;78:3111-3114.
29. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
30. Pierce B, Weng Z. ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins 2007;67:1078-1086.
31. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
32. Launay G, Simonson T. A large decoy set of protein-protein complexes produced by flexible docking. J Comput Chem 2011;32:106-120.
33. Mitra P, Pal D. dockYard-a repository to assist modeling of protein-protein docking. J Mol Model 2011;17:599-606.
34. Tobi D, Bahar I. Optimal design of protein docking potentials: efficiency and limitations. Proteins 2006;62:970-981.
35. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
36. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006;65:392-406.
37. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Geometry-based flexible and symmetric protein docking. Proteins 2005;60:224-231.
38. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
39. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
40. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. Charmm - a Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
41. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique, and clustering guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function. Proteins 2005;60:314-318.
42. Liang S, Meroueh SO, Wang G, Qiu C, Zhou Y. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys. Proteins 2009;75:397-403.
43. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 1999;35:364-373.
44. Lu H, Lu L, Skolnick J. Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. Biophys J 2003;84:1895-1901.
45. Chuang GY, Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking. Biophys J 2008;95:4217-4227.
46. Comeau SR, Kozakov D, Brenke R, Shen Y, Beglov D, Vajda S. ClusPro: performance in CAPRI rounds 6-11 and the new server. Proteins 2007;69:781-785.
47. Mintseris J, Pierce B, Wiehe K, Anderson R, Chen R, Weng Z. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 2007;69:511-520.
48. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
49. Brenke R, Hall DR, Chuang GY, Comeau SR, Beglov D, Vajda S, Kozakov D. Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-antigen docking. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2608-2614.
50. Huang SY, Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition. Proteins 2008;72:557-579.
51. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
52. Ravikant DV, Elber R. PIE-efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein-protein docking. Proteins 2010;78:400-419.
53. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W363-W367.
54. Ravikant DV, Elber R. Energy design for protein-protein interactions. J Chem Phys 2011;135:065102.
55. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 2003;52:113-117.
56. Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition. Proteins 2007;69:704-718.
57. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
58. Kozakov D, Clodfelter KH, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking. Biophys J 2005;89:867-875.
59. Li L, Chen R, Weng Z. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 2003;53:693-707.
60. Andrusier N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FireDock: Fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins 2007;69:139-159.
61. Kozakov D, Schueler-Furman O, Vajda S. Discrimination of near-native structures in protein-protein docking by testing the stability of local minima. Proteins 2008;72:993-1004.