Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 511-520

  Mintseris, Julian ^a   Pierce, Brian ^a   Wiehe, Kevin ^a   Anderson, Robert ^a   Chen, Rong ^a   Weng, Zhiping ^a,b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

Protein complexes; Protein interactions; Protein interfaces; Protein recognition

Indexed keywords

ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ARTICLE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY COMPLEX; IMMUNOGLOBULIN FAB FRAGMENTS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MURAMIDASE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 35449008122     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21502     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
2. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
3. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
4. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
5. Chen R, Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 2002;47:281-294.
6. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 1999;35:364-373.
7. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
8. Mintseris J, Weng Z. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:10930-10935.
9. Levitt M, Warshel A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975;253:694-698.
10. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-950.
11. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
12. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
13. Warme PK, Morgan RS. A survey of atomic interactions in 21 proteins. J Mol Biol 1978;118:273-287.
14. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Levitt M. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues. J Mol Biol 1995; 252:709-720.
15. Thomas PD, Dill KA. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol 1996;257:457-469.
16. Li AJ, Nussinov R. A set of van der Waals and coulombic radii of protein atoms for molecular and solvent-accessible surface calculation, packing evaluation, and docking. Proteins 1998;32:111-127.
17. Melo F, Feytmans E. Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J Mol Biol 1997;267:207-222.
18. Mitchell JBO, Alex A, Snarey M. SATIS: atom typing from chemical connectivity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999;39:751-757.
19. Mintseris J, Weng Z. Optimizing protein representations with information theory. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 2004;15:160-169.
20. Cline MS, Karplus K, Lathrop RH, Smith TF, Rogers RG, Jr, Haussler D. Information-theoretic dissection of pairwise contact potentials. Proteins 2002;49:7-14.
21. Zhang L, Skolnick J. How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to "true" potentials? Protein Sci 1998;7:112-122.
22. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 2005;60:214-216.
23. Desmyter A, Spinelli S, Payan F, Lauwereys M, Wyns L, Muylder-mans S, Cambillau C. Three camelid VHH domains in complex with porcine pancreatic α-amylase. Inhibition and versatility of binding topology. J Biol Chem 2002;277:23645-23650.
24. Chen R, Tong W, Mintseris J, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK predictions for the CAPRI challenge. Proteins 2003;52:68-73.
25. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of PRedicted interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
26. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006;65:392-406.
27. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91.
28. Mintseris J, Weng Z. Atomic contact vectors in protein-protein recognition. Proteins 2003;53:629-639.
29. Boyan JA. Learning Evaluation Functions for Global Optimization [PhD thesis]: Carnegie Mellon University; 1998.
30. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589-1591.
31. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. NACCESS. 2.1.1: Department of biochemistry and molecular biology, University College London; 1993.
32. Wang G, Arthur JW, Dunbrack RL. S2C: a database correlating sequence and atomic coordinate numbering in the protein data bank. : http://www.fccc.edu/ research/labs/dubrack/s2c; 2002.
33. Mendez R, Leplae R, De Maria L, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.