InterEvScore: A novel coarse-grained interface scoring function using a multi-body statistical potential coupled to evolution

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 1742-1749

  Andreani, Jessica ^a,b,c   Faure, Guilhem ^a,b,c   Guerois, Raphael ^a,b,c  

^a CEA   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; KNOWLEDGE BASE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; KNOWLEDGE BASES; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84880245822     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt260     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akbal-Delibas, B. et al. (2012) An evolutionary conservation-based method for refining and reranking protein complex structures. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 10, 1242002.
2. Aloy, P. et al. (2003) The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 332, 989-998.
3. Andreani, J. et al. (2012) Versatility and invariance in the evolution of homologous heteromeric interfaces. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, e1002677.
4. Andrusier, N. et al. (2007) FireDock: fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins, 69, 139-159.
5. Berman, H.M. et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
6. Chaudhury, S. et al. (2011) Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2. PLoS One, 6, e22477.
7. Chen, R. et al. (2003) ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins, 52, 80-87.
8. Cheng, T.M. et al. (2007) pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins, 68, 503-515.
9. de Vries, S.J. et al. (2006) WHISCY: what information does surface conservation yield? Application to data-driven docking. Proteins, 63, 479-489.
10. Dominguez, C. et al. (2003) HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 1731-1737.
11. Edgar, R.C. (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics, 26, 2460-2461.
12. Engelen, S. et al. (2009) Joint evolutionary trees: a large-scale method to predict protein interfaces based on sequence sampling. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000267.
13. Faure, G. et al. (2012) InterEvol database: exploring the structure and evolution of protein complex interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D847-D856.
14. Feng, Y. et al. (2007) Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys. Proteins, 68, 57-66.
15. Fiorucci, S. and Zacharias, M. (2010) Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT. Proteins, 78, 3131-3139.
16. Fitzgerald, J.E. et al. (2007) Reduced C(beta) statistical potentials can outperform all-atom potentials in decoy identification. Protein Sci., 16, 2123-2139.
17. Goodsell, D.S. and Olson, A.J. (2000) Structural symmetry and protein function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 29, 105-153.
18. Gray, J.J. et al. (2003) Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol., 331, 281-299.
19. Halperin, I. et al. (2006) Correlated mutations: advances and limitations. A study on fusion proteins and on the Cohesin-Dockerin families. Proteins, 63, 832-845.
20. Huang, S.Y. and Zou, X. (2010) MDockPP: a hierarchical approach for proteinprotein docking and its application to CAPRI rounds 15-19. Proteins, 78, 3096-3103.
21. Hwang, H. et al. (2010) Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins, 78, 3111-3114.
22. Janin, J. (2010) Protein-protein docking tested in blind predictions: the CAPRI experiment. Mol. Biosyst., 6, 2351-2362.
23. Kanamori, E. et al. (2007) Docking of protein molecular surfaces with evolutionary trace analysis. Proteins, 69, 832-838.
24. Khashan, R. et al. (2012) Scoring protein interaction decoys using exposed residues (SPIDER): a novel multibody interaction scoring function based on frequent geometric patterns of interfacial residues. Proteins, 80, 2207-2217.
25. Kozakov, D. et al. (2006) PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins, 65, 392-406.
26. Krishnamoorthy, B. and Tropsha, A. (2003) Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from non-native protein conformations. Bioinformatics, 19, 1540-1548.
27. Kundrotas, P.J. et al. (2012) Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 9438-9441.
28. Landau, M. et al. (2005) ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, W299-W302.
29. Lensink, M.F. et al. (2007) Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins, 69, 704-718.
30. Lensink, M.F. and Wodak, S.J. (2010) Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins, 78, 3073-3084.
31. Levy, E.D. et al. (2008) Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes. Nature, 453, 1262-1265.
32. Li, X. et al. (2003) Simplicial edge representation of protein structures and alpha contact potential with confidence measure. Proteins, 53, 792-805.
33. Li, X. and Liang, J. (2005) Geometric cooperativity and anticooperativity of three-body interactions in native proteins. Proteins, 60, 46-65.
34. Madaoui, H. and Guerois, R. (2008) Coevolution at protein complex interfaces can be detected by the complementarity trace with important impact for predictive docking. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 7708-7713.
35. Mayrose, I. et al. (2004) Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: empirical Bayesian methods are superior. Mol. Biol. Evol., 21, 1781-1791.
36. Mendez, R. et al. (2005) Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins, 60, 150-169.
37. Mintseris, J. et al. (2007) Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins, 69, 511-520.
38. Mintseris, J. and Weng, Z. (2005) Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 10930-10935.
39. Mosca, R. et al. (2013) Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks. Nat. Methods, 10, 47-53.
40. Ngan, S.C. et al. (2006) A knowledge-based scoring function based on residue triplets for protein structure prediction. Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 19, 187-193.
41. Ofran, Y. and Rost, B. (2007) ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence. Bioinformatics, 23, e13-e16.
42. Pierce, B. and Weng, Z. (2007) ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins, 67, 1078-1086.
43. Reichmann, D. et al. (2007) The molecular architecture of protein-protein binding sites. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 17, 67-76.
44. Res, I. et al. (2005) An evolution based classifier for prediction of protein interfaces without using protein structures. Bioinformatics, 21, 2496-2501.
45. Ritchie, D.W. et al. (2008) Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions. Bioinformatics, 24, 1865-1873.
46. Sinha, R. et al. (2010) Docking by structural similarity at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins, 78, 3235-3241.
47. Stein, A. et al. (2011) Three-dimensional modeling of protein interactions and complexes is going 'omics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 21, 200-208.
48. Tress, M. et al. (2005) Scoring docking models with evolutionary information. Proteins, 60, 275-280.
49. Vajda, S. and Kozakov, D. (2009) Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 19, 164-170.
50. Vakser, I.A. (2013) Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., pii, S0959-440X(12)00199-6.
51. Vreven, T. et al. (2011) Integrating atom-based and residue-based scoring functions for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci., 20, 1576-1586.
52. Weigt, M. et al. (2009) Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 67-72.
53. Zellner, H. et al. (2012) PresCont: predicting protein-protein interfaces utilizing four residue properties. Proteins, 80, 154-168.
54. Zhang, C. et al. (2004) An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci., 13, 400-411.
55. Zhang, Q.C. et al. (2012) Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature, 490, 556-560.
56. Zhu, H. et al. (2006) NOXclass: prediction of protein-protein interaction types. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 27. Biology