Combining coarse-grained nonbonded and atomistic bonded interactions for protein modeling

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 81-92

  Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biased force field; Binding site prediction; Docking by energy minimization; Protein protein complex formation; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

HYBRID PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ATOMISTIC MODEL; BINDING SITE; COARSE GRAINED MODEL; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

BINDING SITES; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEINS;

EID: 84871061224     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24164     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Dror RO, Dirks RM, Grossman JP, Xu H, Shaw DE. Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu Rev Biophys 2012; 41: 429-452.
2. Levitt M, Warshel A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975; 253: 694-698.
3. Liwo A, Khalili M, Scheraga HA. Ab initio simulations of protein folding pathways by molecular dynamics with united-residue model of polypeptide chains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 2362-2367.
4. Gibson KD, Scheraga HA. Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: assessment in two blind tests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 7547-7552.
5. Ayton GS, Noid WG, Voth GA. Multiscale modeling of biomolecular systems: in serial and in parallel. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007; 17: 192-198.
6. Tozzini V, Trylska J, Chang CE, McCammon JA. Flap opening dynamics in HIV-1 protease explored with a coarse-grained model. J Struct Biol 2007; 157: 606-615.
7. Maupetit J, Tuffery P, Derreumaux P. A coarse-grained protein force field for folding and structure prediction. Proteins 2007; 69: 394-408.
8. Monticelli L, Kandasamy SK, Periole X, Larson RG, Tieleman DP, Marrink SJ. The Martini coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. Chem Theory Comput 2008; 4: 819-834.
9. Enisco M, Rey A. Simple model for the simulation of peptide folding and aggregation with different sequences. J Chem Phys 2012; 136: 215103.
10. Potestio R, Pontiggia F, Micheletti C. Coarse-grained description of protein internal dynamics: an optimal strategy for decomposing proteins in rigid subunits. Biophys J 2009; 96: 4993-5002.
11. DeVane R, Shinoda W, Moore PB, Klein ML. Transferable coarse grain nonbonded interaction model for amino acids. J Chem Theory Comput 2009; 5: 2115-2124.
12. Betancourt MR. Coarse-grained protein model with residue orientation energies derived from atomic force fields. J Phys Chem B 2009; 113: 14824-14830.
13. Maisuradze GG, Senet P, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Investigation of protein folding by coarse-grained molecular dynamics with the UNRES force field. J Phys Chem A 2010; 114: 4471-4485.
14. Hills RDJr, Lu L, Voth GA. Multiscale coarse-graining of the protein energy landscape. PLoS Comput Biol 2010; 6: e1000827.
15. Kmiecik S, Kolinski A. Simulation of chaperonin effect on protein folding: a shift from nucleation-condensation to framework mechanism. J Am Chem Soc 2011; 133: 10283-10289.
16. Clementi C. Coarse-grained models of protein folding: toy models or predictive tools? Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18: 10-15.
17. Orozco M, Orellana L, Hospital A, Naganathan AN, Emperador A, Carrillo O, Gelpí JL. Coarse-grained representation of protein flexibility. Foundations, successes, and shortcomings. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 2011; 85: 183-215.
18. Liwo A, He Y, Scheraga HA. Coarse-grained force field: general folding theory. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011; 13: 16890-16901.
19. Ołdziej S, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, Chinchio M, Nanias M, Vila JA, Khalili M, Arnautova YA, Jagielska A, Makowski M, Schafroth HD, Kaźmierkiewicz R, Ripoll DR, Pillardy J, Saunders JA, Kang YK, Kamerlin SC, Vicatos S, Dryga A, Warshel A. Coarse-grained (multiscale) simulations in studies of biophysical and chemical systems. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2011; 62: 41-64.
20. Zimmermann MT, Leelananda SP, Gniewek P, Feng Y, Jernigan RL, Kloczkowski A Free energies for coarse-grained proteins by integrating multibody statistical contact potentials with entropies from elastic network models. J Struct Funct Genomics 2011; 12: 137-147.
21. Gniewek P, Leelananda SP, Kolinski A, Jernigan RL, Kloczkowski A. Multibody coarse-grained potentials for native structure recognition and quality assessment of protein models. Proteins 2011; 79: 1923-1929.
22. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997; 268: 209-225.
23. Zacharias, M. Protein-protein docking using a reduced model. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 1271-1282.
24. Fiorucci S, Zacharias M. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT. Proteins 2010; 78: 3131-3139.
25. van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC. Groningen molecular simulation GROMOS. Library Manual, BIOMOS b.v, University of Groningen, Groningen: The Netherlands, 1987.
26. Andersen HC. Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys 1980; 72: 2384-2393.
27. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984; 81: 3684-3690.
28. Zacharias, M. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010; 16: 194-200.
29. Levine AJ. P53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 1997; 88: 323-331.
30. Kussie PH, Gorina S, Marechal V, Elenbaas B, Moreau J, Levine AJ, Pavletich NP. Structure of the MDM2 oncoprotein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain. Science 1996; 274: 948-953.
31. Spink KE, Polakis P, Weis WI. Structural basis of the Axin-adenomatous polyposis coli interaction. EMBO J 2000; 19: 2270-2279.
32. May A, Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008, 70: 794-809.
33. Schneider S, Zacharias M. Scoring optimisation of unbound protein-protein docking including protein binding site predictions. J Mol Recognit 2012; 25: 15-23.
34. Li Y, Cortés J, Siméon T. Enhancing systematic protein-protein docking methods using ray casting: application to ATTRACT. Proteins 2011; 79: 3037-3049.
35. Sacquin-Mora S, Carbone A, Lavery R. Identification of protein interaction partners and protein-protein interaction sites. J Mol Biol 2008; 382: 1276-1289.
36. Kuhlmann UC, Pommer AJ, Moore GR, James R, Kleanthous C. Specificity in protein-protein interactions: the structural basis fordual recognition in endonuclease colicin-immunity protein complexes. J Mol Biol 2000; 301: 1163-1178.