Replicating damaged DNA in eukaryotes

Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Chatterjee, Nimrat ^a   Siede, Wolfram ^b,c  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c Anta Fe BioLabs LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CYTOLOGY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; EUKARYOTE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

CELL CYCLE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; EUKARYOTA; MODELS, MOLECULAR;

EID: 84885391226     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19430264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019836     Document Type: Article

References (169)

1. Abbas T, Keaton MA, Dutta A. 2013. Genomic instability in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5: a012914.
2. Acharya N, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L. 2006. Complex formation with Rev1 enhances the proficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase z for mismatch extension and for extension opposite from DNA lesions. Mol Cell Biol 26: 9555-9563.
3. Acharya N, Brahma A, Haracska L, Prakash L, Prakash S. 2007. Mutations in the ubiquitin binding UBZ motif of DNA polymerase h do not impair its function in translesion synthesis during replication. Mol Cell Biol 27: 7266-7272.
4. Admire A, Shanks L, Danzl N, Wang M, Weier U, Stevens W, Hunt E, Weinert T. 2006. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev 20: 159-173.
5. Amara F, Colombo R, Cazzaniga P, Pescini D, Csikasz-Nagy A, Muzi Falconi M, Besozzi D, Plevani P. 2013. In vivo and in silico analysis of PCNA ubiquitylation in the activation of the post replication repair pathway in S. cerevisiae. BMC Syst Biol 7: 24.
6. Ammazzalorso F, Pirzio LM, Bignami M, Franchitto A, Pichierri P. 2010. ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery. EMBO J 29: 3156-3169.
7. Andreassen PR, D'Andrea AD, Taniguchi T. 2004. ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. Genes Dev 18: 1958-1963.
8. Aparicio OM. 2013. Location, location, location: It's all in the timing for replication origins. Genes Dev 27: 117-128.
9. Bahassi EM, Ovesen JL, Riesenberg AL, Bernstein WZ, Hasty PE, Stambrook PJ. 2008. The checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2 regulate the functional associations between hBRCA2 and Rad51 in response to DNA damage. Oncogene 27: 3977-3985.
10. Bailly V, Lauder S, Prakash S, Prakash L. 1997. Yeast DNA repair proteins Rad6 and Rad18 form a heterodimer that has ubiquitin conjugating, DNA binding, and ATP hydrolytic activities. J Biol Chem 272: 23360-23365.
11. Ball LG, Zhang K, Cobb JA, Boone C, Xiao W. 2009. The yeast Shu complex couples error-free post-replication repair to homologous recombination. Mol Microbiol 73: 89-102.
12. Bansbach CE, Betous R, Lovejoy CA, Glick GG, Cortez D. 2009. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev 23: 2405-2414.
13. Bartek J, Falck J, Lukas J. 2001. Chk2 kinase-A busy messenger. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 877-886.
14. Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Krämer A, Tort F, Zieger K, Guldberg P, Sehested M, Nesland JM, Lukas C, et al. 2005. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434: 864-870.
15. Bell SP, Dutta A. 2002. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 333-374.
16. Bermejo R, Capra T, Jossen R, Colosio A, Frattini C, Carotenuto W, Cocito A, Doksani Y, Klein H, Gomez-Gonzalez B, et al. 2011. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 146: 233-246.
17. Blastyak A, Pinter L, Unk I, Prakash L, Prakash S, Haracska L. 2007. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol Cell 28: 167-175.
18. Blastyak A, Hajdu I, Unk I, Haracska L. 2010. Role of double-stranded DNA translocase activity of human HLTF in replication of damaged DNA. Mol Cell Biol 30: 684-693.
19. Branzei D, Foiani M. 2009. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 1038-1046.
20. Branzei D, Foiani M. 2010. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 208-219.
21. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D, Seki M, Enomoto T, Ohta K, Foiani M. 2006. Ubc9 and Mms21 mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509-522.
22. Branzei D, Vanoli F, Foiani M. 2008. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456: 915-920.
23. Broomfield S, Chow BL, Xiao W. 1998. MMS2, encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating-enzyme-like protein, is a member of the yeast error-free postreplication repair pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 5678-5683.
24. Bryant HE, Petermann E, Schultz N, Jemth AS, Loseva O, Issaeva N, Johansson F, Fernandez S, McGlynn P, Helleday T. 2009. PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination. EMBO J 28: 2601-2615.
25. Byun TS, Pacek M, Yee M-C, Walter JC, Cimprich KA. 2005. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev 19: 1040-1052.
26. Callegari AJ, Clark E, Pneuman A, Kelly TJ. 2010. Postreplication gaps at UV lesions are signals for checkpoint activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 8219-8224.
27. Cha RS, Kleckner N. 2002. ATR Homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297: 602-606.
28. Chen Y, Sanchez Y. 2004. Chk1 in the DNA damage response: Conserved roles from yeasts to mammals. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 1025-1032.
29. Chini C, Chen J. 2004. Claspin, a regulator of Chk1 in replication stress pathway. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 1033-1037.
30. Chou DM, Elledge SJ. 2006. Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 18143-18147.
31. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. 2010. The DNA damage response: Making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 40: 179-204.
32. Ciccia A, Bredemeyer AL, Sowa ME, Terret ME, Jallepalli PV, Harper JW, Elledge SJ. 2009. The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. Genes Dev 23: 2415-2425.
33. Clauson C, Schärer OD, Niedernhofer L. 2013. Advances in understanding the complex mechanisms of DNA interstrand cross-link repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012732.
34. Clemente-Ruiz M, Prado F. 2009. Chromatin assembly controls replication fork stability. EMBO Rep 10: 790-796.
35. Cortez D, Glick G, Elledge SJ. 2004. Minichromosome maintenance proteins are direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 10078-10083.
36. Costanzo V, Robertson K, Bibikova M, Kim E, Grieco D, Gottesman M, Carroll D, Gautier J. 2001. Mre11 protein complex prevents double-strand break accumulation during chromosomal DNA replication. Mol Cell 8: 137-147.
37. Costanzo V, Shechter D, Lupardus PJ, Cimprich KA, Gottesman M, Gautier J. 2003. An ATR and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell 11: 203-213.
38. Cotta-Ramusino C, Fachinetti D, Lucca C, Doksani Y, Lopes M, Sogo J, Foiani M. 2005. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpointdefective cells. Mol Cell 17: 153-159.
39. Coulon S, Ramasubramanyan S, Alies C, Philippin G, Lehmann A, Fuchs RP. 2010. Rad8Rad5/Mms2-Ubc13 ubiquitin ligase complex controls translesion synthesis in fission yeast. EMBO J 29: 2048-2058.
40. Cremona CA, Sarangi P, Yang Y, Hang LE, Rahman S, Zhao X. 2012. Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the Mec1 checkpoint. Mol Cell 45: 422-432.
41. Cuvier O, Stanojcic S, Lemaitre JM, Mechali M. 2008. A topoisomerase II-dependent mechanism for resetting replicons at the S-M-phase transition. Genes Dev 22: 860-865.
42. Daigaku Y, Davies AA, Ulrich HD. 2010. Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature 465: 951-955.
43. Davies SL, North PS, Dart A, Lakin ND, Hickson ID. 2004. Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. Mol Cell Biol 24: 1279-1291.
44. Davies SL, North PS, Hickson ID. 2007. Role for BLM in replication-fork restart and suppression of origin firing after replicative stress. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 677-679.
45. Desany BA, Alcasabas AA, Bachant JB, Elledge SJ. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev 12: 2956-2970.
46. Dhar MK, Sehgal S, Kaul S. 2012. Structure, replication efficiency and fragility of yeast ARS elements. Res Microbiol 163: 243-253.
47. Doksani Y, Bermejo R, Fiorani S, Haber JE, Foiani M. 2009. Replicon dynamics, dormant origin firing, and terminal fork integrity after double-strand break formation. Cell 137: 247-258.
48. Durando M, Tateishi S, Vaziri C. 2013. A non-catalytic role of DNA polymerase h in recruiting Rad18 and promoting PCNA monoubiquitination at stalled replication forks. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 3079-3093.
49. Dutta A, Bell SP. 1997. Initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13: 293-332.
50. Edmunds CE, Simpson LJ, Sale JE. 2008. PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 define temporally distinct mechanisms for controlling translesion synthesis in the avian cell line DT40. Mol Cell 30: 519-529.
51. El-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. 1993. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75: 817-825.
52. El-Shemerly M, Hess D, Pyakurel AK, Moselhy S, Ferrari S. 2008. ATR-dependent pathways control hEXO1 stability in response to stalled forks. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 511-519.
53. Errico A, Cosentino C, Rivera T, Losada A, Schwob E, Hunt T, Costanzo V. 2009. Tipin/Tim1/And1 protein complex promotes Pol a chromatin binding and sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J 28: 3681-3692.
54. Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuasen RG, Bartek J, Lukas J. 2001. The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature 410: 842-847.
55. Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, Santarosa M, Dillon KJ, Hickson I, Knights C, et al. 2005. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434: 917-921.
56. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T. 2006. DNA repair and mutagenesis, 2nd ed. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC.
57. Gangavarapu V, Haracska L, Unk I, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L. 2006. Mms2-Ubc13-dependent and -independent roles of Rad5 ubiquitin ligase in postreplication repair and translesion DNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 26: 7783-7790.
58. Garg P, Burgers PM. 2005. Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases h and REV1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 18361-18366.
59. Ge XQ, Jackson DA, Blow JJ. 2007. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev 21: 3331-3341.
60. Giannattasio M, Follonier C, Tourriere H, Puddu F, Lazzaro F, Pasero P, Lopes M, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. 2010. Exo1 competes with repair synthesis, converts NER intermediates to long ssDNA gaps, and promotes checkpoint activation. Mol Cell 40: 50-62.
61. Gillespie PJ, Blow JJ. 2010. Clusters, factories and domains: The complex structure of S-phase comes into focus. Cell Cycle 9: 3218-3226.
62. Groth A, Lukas J, Nigg EA, Sillje HH, Wernstedt C, Bartek J, Hansen K. 2003. Human Tousled like kinases are targeted by an ATM and Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO J 22: 1676-1687.
63. Guo C, Sonoda E, Tang T-S, Parker JL, Bielen AB, Takeda S, Ulrich HD, Friedberg EC. 2006a. REV1 protein interacts with PCNA: Significance of the REV1 BRCT domain in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell 23: 265-271.
64. Guo C, Tang T-S, Bienko M, Parker JL, Bielen AB, Sonoda E, Takeda S, Ulrich HD, Dikic I, Friedberg EC. 2006b. Ubiquitin-binding motifs in REV1 protein are required for its role in the tolerance of DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 26: 8892-8900.
65. Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ. 1993. The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 75: 805-816.
66. Heffernan TP, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Heinloth AN, Simpson DA, Paules RS, Sancar A, Cordeiro-Stone M, Kaufmann WK. 2007. Cdc7-Dbf4 and the human S checkpoint response to UVC. J Biol Chem 282: 9458-9468.
67. Henry-Mowatt J, Jackson D, Masson JY, Johnson PA, Clements PM, Benson FE, Thompson LH, Takeda S, West SC, Caldecott KW. 2003. XRCC3 and Rad51 modulate replication fork progression on damaged vertebrate chromosomes. Mol Cell 11: 1109-1117.
68. Hishida T, Kubota Y, Carr AM, Iwasaki H. 2009. RAD6 RAD18-RAD5-pathway-dependent tolerance to chronic low-dose ultraviolet light. Nature 457: 612-615.
69. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan G-L, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141.
70. Huang D, Piening BD, Paulovich AG. 2013. The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent. Mol Cell Biol 33: 1515-1527.
71. Jansen JG, Tsaalbi-Shtylik A, Hendriks G, Gali H, Hendel A, Johansson F, Erixon K, Livneh Z, Mullenders LH, Haracska L, et al. 2009. Separate domains of Rev1 mediate two modes of DNA damage bypass in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 29: 3113-3123.
72. Jentsch S, McGrath JP, Varshavsky A. 1987. The yeast DNA repair gene RAD6 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Nature 329: 131-134.
73. Jones RM, Petermann E. 2012. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response. Biochem J 443: 13-26.
74. Kai M, Boddy MN, Russell P, Wang TS. 2005. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev 19: 919-932.
75. Karras GI, Jentsch S. 2010. The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 141: 255-267.
76. Karras GI, Fumasoni M, Sienski G, Vanoli F, Branzei D, Jentsch S. 2013. Noncanonical role of the 9-1-1 clamp in the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway. Mol Cell 49: 536-546.
77. Kim N, Huang SN, Williams JS, Li YC, Clark AB, Cho JE, Kunkel TA, Pommier Y, Jinks-Robertson S. 2011. Mutagenic processing of ribonucleotides in DNA by yeast topoisomerase I. Science 332: 1561-1564.
78. Kitagawa R, Bakkenist CJ, McKinnon PJ, Kastan MB. 2004. Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway. Genes Dev 18: 1423-1438.
79. Kitamura E, Blow JJ, Tanaka TU. 2006. Live-cell imaging reveals replication of individual replicons in eukaryotic replication factories. Cell 125: 1297-1308.
80. Kozmin SG, Jinks-Robertson S. 2013. The mechanism of nucleotide excision repair-mediated UV-induced mutagenesis in nonproliferating cells. Genetics 193: 803-817.
81. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. 2000. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell 6: 839-849.
82. Kunkel TA, Bebenek K. 2000. DNA replication fidelity. Annu Rev Biochem 69: 497-529.
83. Labib K, Gambus A. 2007. A key role for the GINS complex at DNA replication forks. Trends Cell Biol 17: 271-278.
84. Labib K, Tercero JA, Diffley JF. 2000. Uninterrupted MCM27 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science 288: 1643-1647.
85. Lane D, Levine A. 2010. p53 Research: The past thirty years and the next thirty years. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000893.
86. Lazzaro F, Novarina D, Amara F, Watt DL, Stone JE, Costanzo V, Burgers PM, Kunkel TA, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. 2012. RNase H and postreplication repair protect cells from ribonucleotides incorporated in DNA. Mol Cell 45: 99-110.
87. Lehmann AR. 1972. Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 66: 319-337.
88. Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP. 2006. Gaps and forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 1495-1498.
89. Leman AR, Noguchi C, Lee CY, Noguchi E. 2010. Human Timeless and Tipin stabilize replication forks and facilitate sister-chromatid cohesion. J Cell Sci 123: 660-670.
90. Liberi G, Maffioletti G, Lucca C, Chiolo I, Baryshnikova A, Cotta-Ramusino C, Lopes M, Pellicioli A, Haber JE, Foiani M. 2005. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev 19: 339-350.
91. Lin JR, Zeman MK, Chen JY, Yee MC, Cimprich KA. 2011. SHPRH and HLTF act in a damage-specific manner to coordinate different forms of postreplication repair and prevent mutagenesis. Mol Cell 42: 237-249.
92. Lomonosov M, Anand S, Sangrithi M, Davies R, Venkitaraman AR. 2003. Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks by the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility protein. Genes Dev 17: 3017-3022.
93. Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM. 2006. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 21: 15-27.
94. Luke-Glaser S, Luke B, Grossi S, Constantinou A. 2010. FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S-phase checkpoint signalling. EMBO J 29: 795-805.
95. Maréchal A, Zou L. 2013. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012716.
96. Martin SA, Lord CJ, Ashworth A. 2008. DNA repair deficiency as a therapeutic target in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18: 80-86.
97. Masai H, Arai K. 2002. Cdc7 kinase complex: A key regulator in the initiation of DNA replication. J Cell Physiol 190: 287-296.
98. McIntosh D, Blow JJ. 2012. Dormant origins, the licensing checkpoint, and the response to replicative stresses. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a012955.
99. Mechali M. 2010. Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: Many choices for appropriate answers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 728-738.
100. Melo JA, Toczyski DP. 2002. A unified view of the DNA damage checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14: 237-245.
101. Minca EC, Kowalski D. 2010. Multiple Rad5 activities mediate sister chromatid recombination to bypass DNA damage at stalled replication forks. Mol Cell 38: 649-661.
102. Minca EC, Kowalski D. 2011. Replication fork stalling by bulky DNA damage: Localization at active origins and checkpoint modulation. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 2610-2623.
103. Motegi A, Kuntz K, Majeed A, Smith S, Myung K. 2006. Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 26: 1424-1433.
104. Motegi A, Liaw HJ, Lee KY, Roest HP, Maas A, Wu X, Moinova H, Markowitz SD, Ding H, Hoeijmakers JH, et al. 2008. Polyubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen by HLTF and SHPRH prevents genomic instability from stalled replication forks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 12411-12416.
105. Murai J, Huang SY, Das BB, Renaud A, Zhang Y, Doroshow JH, Ji J, Takeda S, Pommier Y. 2012. Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors. Cancer Res 72: 5588-5599.
106. Murakami-Sekimata A, Huang D, Piening BD, Bangur C, Paulovich AG. 2010. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17 and RAD24 genes are required for suppression of mutagenic post-replicative repair during chronic DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 9: 824-834.
107. Muramatsu S, Hirai K, Tak YS, Kamimura Y, Araki H. 2010. CDK-dependent complex formation between replication proteins Dpb11, Sld2, Pol 1, and GINS in budding yeast. Genes Dev 24: 602-612.
108. Nakanishi M, Katsuno Y, Niida H, Murakami H, Shimada M. 2010. Chk1-cyclin A/Cdk1 axis regulates origin firing programs in mammals. Chromosome Res 18: 103-113.
109. Navas TA, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. 1995. DNA polymerase 1 links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. Cell 80: 29-39.
110. Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. 2010. Genomic instability-An evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 220-228.
111. Nick McElhinny SA, Kumar D, Clark AB, Watt DL, Watts BE, Lundstrom EB, Johansson E, Chabes A, Kunkel TA 2010a.Genome instability due to ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA. Nat Chem Biol 6: 774-781.
112. Nick McElhinny SA, Watts BE, Kumar D, Watt DL, Lundstrom EB, Burgers PM, Johansson E, Chabes A, Kunkel TA. 2010b. Abundant ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA by yeast replicative polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 4949-4954.
113. Niida H, Nakanishi M. 2006. DNA damage checkpoints in mammals. Mutagenesis 21: 3-9.
114. Pages V, Bresson A, Acharya N, Prakash S, Fuchs RP, Prakash L. 2008. Requirement of Rad5 for DNA polymerase zdependent translesion synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180: 73-82.
115. Petermann E, Maya-Mendoza A, Zachos G, Gillespie DA, Jackson DA, Caldecott KW. 2006. Chk1 requirement for high global rates of replication fork progression during normal vertebrate S phase. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3319-3326.
116. Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T. 2010. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51 mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell 37: 492-502.
117. Pfander B, Moldovan G-L, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S. 2005. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436: 428-433.
118. Pichierri P, Nicolai S, Cignolo L, Bignami M, Franchitto A. 2012. The RAD9-RAD1-HUS1 (9.1.1) complex interacts with WRN and is crucial to regulate its response to replication fork stalling. Oncogene 31: 2809-2823.
119. Pope BD, Aparicio OM, Gilbert DM. 2013. SnapShot: Replication timing. Cell 152: 1390-1390.e1.
120. Pospiech H, Grosse F, Pisani FM. 2010. The initiation step of eukaryotic DNA replication. Subcell Biochem 50: 79-104.
121. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L. 2005. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: Specificity of structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 317-353.
122. Preston BD, Albertson TM, Herr AJ. 2010. DNA replication fidelity and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 20: 281-293.
123. Puddu F, Piergiovanni G, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. 2011. Sensing of replication stress and Mec1 activation act through two independent pathways involving the 9-1-1 complex and DNA polymerase 1. PLoS Genet 7: e1002022.
124. Reha-Krantz LJ. 2010. DNA polymerase proofreading: Multiple roles maintain genome stability. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804: 1049-1063.
125. Reijns MA, Rabe B, Rigby RE, Mill P, Astell KR, Lettice LA, Boyle S, Leitch A, Keighren M, Kilanowski F, et al. 2012. Enzymatic removal of ribonucleotides from DNA is essential for mammalian genome integrity and development. Cell 149: 1008-1022.
126. Remus D, Beall EL, Botchan MR. 2004. DNA topology, not DNA sequence, is a critical determinant for Drosophila ORC-DNA binding. EMBO J 23: 897-907.
127. Robison JG, Elliott J, Dixon K, Oakley GG. 2004. Replication protein A and the Mre11.Rad50.Nbs1 complex co-localize and interact at sites of stalled replication forks. J Biol Chem 279: 34802-34810.
128. Rupp WD, Howard-Flanders P. 1968. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol 31: 291-304.
129. Rupp WD, Wilde CE, Reno DL, Howard-Flanders P. 1971. Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet irradiated Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 61: 25-44.
130. Sale JE. 2013. Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5: a012708.
131. Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Linn S. 2004. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 39-85.
132. Santamaria D, Viguera E, Martinez-Robles ML, Hyrien O, Hernandez P, Krimer DB, Schvartzman JB. 2000. Bi-directional replication and random termination. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 2099-2107.
133. Santocanale C, Diffley JFX. 1998. A Mec1and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395: 615-618.
134. Seiler JA, Conti C, Syed A, Aladjem MI, Pommier Y. 2007. The intra-S-phase checkpoint affects both DNA replication initiation and elongation: Single-cell and -DNA fiber analyses. Mol Cell Biol 27: 5806-5818.
135. Sidorova JM, Li N, Folch A, Monnat RJ Jr. 2008. The RecQ helicase WRN is required for normal replication fork progression after DNA damage or replication fork arrest. Cell Cycle 7: 796-807.
136. Sillje HH, Nigg EA. 2001. Identification of human Asf1 chromatin assembly factors as substrates of Tousled-like kinases. Curr Biol 11: 1068-1073.
137. Sirbu BM, Cortez D. 2013. DNA damage response: Three levels of DNA repair regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5: a012724.
138. Sobeck A, Stone S, Costanzo V, de Graaf B, Reuter T, de Winter J, Wallisch M, Akkari Y, Olson S, Wang W, et al. 2006. Fanconi anemia proteins are required to prevent accumulation of replication-associated DNA doublestrand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 425-437.
139. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Buerstedde J-M, Bezzubova O, Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Takata M, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Takeda S. 1998. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. EMBO J 17: 598-608.
140. Sorensen CS, Hansen LT, Dziegielewski J, Syljuasen RG, Lundin C, Bartek J, Helleday T. 2005. The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 7: 195-201.
141. Spivak G, Hanawalt PC. 1992. Translesion DNA synthesis in the dihydrofolate reductase domain of UV-irradiated CHO cells. Biochemistry 31: 6794-6800.
142. Stelter P, Ulrich HD. 2003. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425: 188-191.
143. Stillman B. 2008. DNA polymerases at the replication fork in eukaryotes. Mol Cell 30: 259-260.
144. Stukenberg PT, Turner J, O'Donnell M. 1994. An explanation for lagging strand replication: Polymerase hopping among DNA sliding clamps. Cell 78: 877-887.
145. Tanaka K. 2010. Multiple functions of the S-phase checkpoint mediator. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74: 2367-2373.
146. Tanaka S, Tak YS, Araki H. 2007. The role of CDK in the initiation step of DNA replication in eukaryotes. Cell Div 2: 16.
147. Tercero JA, Diffley JFX. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/ Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412: 553-557.
148. Torres JZ, Schnakenberg SL, Zakian VA. 2004. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: Viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities. Mol Cell Biol 24: 3198-3212.
149. Tourriere H, Pasero P. 2007. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 900-913.
150. Trenz K, Smith E, Smith S, Costanzo V. 2006. ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks. EMBO J 25: 1764-1774.
151. Tye BK. 1999. MCM proteins in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 649-686.
152. Ulrich HD, Jentsch S. 2000. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J 19: 3388-3397.
153. Unk I, Hajdu I, Fatyol K, Szakal B, Blastyak A, Bermudez V, Hurwitz J, Prakash L, Prakash S, Haracska L. 2006. Human SHPRH is a ubiquitin ligase for Mms2-Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 18107-18112.
154. Unk I, Hajdu I, Fatyol K, Hurwitz J, Yoon JH, Prakash L, Prakash S, Haracska L. 2008. Human HLTF functions as a ubiquitin ligase for proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 3768-3773.
155. Unk I, Hajdu I, Blastyak A, Haracska L. 2010. Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance. DNA Repair (Amst) 9: 257-267.
156. Unsal-Kacmaz K, Chastain PD, Qu PP, Minoo P, CordeiroStone M, Sancar A, Kaufmann WK. 2007. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol Cell Biol 27: 3131-3142.
157. Vanoli F, Fumasoni M, Szakal B, Maloisel L, Branzei D. 2010. Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switch. PLoS Genet 6: e1001205.
158. Vashee S, Cvetic C, Lu W, Simancek P, Kelly TJ, Walter JC. 2003. Sequence-independent DNA binding and replication initiation by the human origin recognition complex. Genes Dev 17: 1894-1908.
159. Waters LS, Walker GC. 2006. The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G2/M phase rather than S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 8971-8976.
160. Watt DL, Johansson E, Burgers PM, Kunkel TA. 2011. Replication of ribonucleotide-containing DNA templates by yeast replicative polymerases. DNA Repair (Amst) 10: 897-902.
161. Weinreich M, Stillman B. 1999. Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S-phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway. EMBO J 18: 5334-5346.
162. Xiao Z, Chen Z, Gunasekera AH, Sowin TJ, Rosenberg SH, Fesik S, Zhang H. 2003. Chk1 mediates S and G2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNA-damaging agents. J Biol Chem 278: 21767-21773.
163. Yang XH, Shiotani B, Classon M, Zou L. 2008. Chk1 and Claspin potentiate PCNA ubiquitination. Genes Dev 22: 1147-1152.
164. Yao NY, O'Donnell M. 2010. SnapShot: The replisome. Cell 141: 1088, 1088.e1.
165. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. 2009. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 1077-1088.
166. Zhang H, Lawrence CW. 2005. The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 15954-15959.
167. Zhang W, Qin Z, Zhang X, Xiao W. 2011. Roles of sequential ubiquitination of PCNA in DNA-damage tolerance. FEBS Lett 585: 2786-2794.
168. Zou L, Stillman B. 1998. Formation of a preinitiation complex by S-phase cyclin CDK-dependent loading of Cdc45p onto chromatin. Science 280: 593-596.
169. Zou L, Stillman B. 2000. Assembly of a complex containing Cdc45p, replication protein A, and Mcm2p at replication origins controlled by S-phase cyclin-dependent kinases and Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase. Mol Cell Biol 20: 3086-3096.